Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF

QVMMInvescoEquity
Expense ratio0.15%
Net assets$426.1M
Holdings354
Yield (TTM)1.29%
1 week+0.3%
1 month+0.6%
3 months-3.7%
6 months+0.4%
YTD+12.0%
1 year+12.5%
3 years*+18.3%
5 years*+7.6%

Total returns with distributions reinvested; * a year. Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 · filings through Aug 31, 2026 · page updated Nov 3, 2026

At a glance

QVMM charges 0.15% a year, above the 0.13% average of the 8 funds most like it (the 5th cheapest of 9). It has $426.1M in assets, the 7th largest of that group; it paid 1.29% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned +12.5% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 6th of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +18.3% a year. At its worst it fell 22.5% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 18 months after the low. Its ten largest positions make up 9.0% of the fund, out of 354 in all.

The short version

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) held 354 mid-size US companies as of August 31, 2026. It owns the S&P MidCap 400 minus roughly the tenth of stocks that score worst on a blend of quality, value and momentum. Because it keeps 90% of the parent index and weights stocks by size, it behaves much like a plain mid-cap fund. It charges 0.15% a year. Broad S&P 400 trackers such as SPMD charge 0.03% and IJH charges 0.05%.

Price history

The interactive chart needs JavaScript.

QVMM +12.5% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.

Prices through Oct 27, 2026. Total return: the price with distributions reinvested.

How it has behaved

Volatility (1 year)14.8%annualized; the S&P 500 is usually 15–20%
Worst drop (1 year)-8.4%3 years: -24.0% · all history: -24.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.94moves about with the market
Sharpe ratio (1 year)0.58return above cash per unit of risk
Since launch+7.4%a year over 5.3 years
Total over 5 years+44%
52-week range$29.00 – $36.71
Last price $34.15 on Oct 27, 2026, 7.0% below the 52-week high · above its 200-day average ($34.05).
YTD1 yr3 yr5 yr10 yrSince start
QVMM official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2024—+13.46%———+5.55%
QVMM price data to Oct 27, 2026+12.0%+12.5%+18.3%+7.6%—+7.4%
Multi-year figures are annualized total returns with distributions reinvested. "Official" figures are the SEC-standard returns from the fund's prospectus; the price-data row is computed from daily prices.
  • Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, QVMM returned +12.5%, 6th of 9 among similar funds.
  • Its 5-year annualized return was +7.6%.
  • Its worst full calendar year was 2022 (-13.1%); its best was 2023 (+15.4%).
  • The deepest fall in its price history was 24% (Nov 25, 2024 to Apr 8, 2025), recovered by Dec 10, 2025.
-13%202215%202313%20249%202512%2026*
-13%202215%202313%20249%202512%2026*
Calendar-year total returns from price data, distributions reinvested. * 2026 is year to date. From the prospectus: best quarter +11.41% (Dec 31, 2023), worst -14.91% (Jun 30, 2022).
Show as a table
YearPrice dataProspectus (official)
2026 (to date)+12.1%—
2025+8.8%—
2024+13.4%+13.46%
2023+15.4%+15.43%
2022-13.1%-13.02%
2008 financial crisis
stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009
Before this security existed
2020 COVID crash
stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020
Before this security existed
2022 bear market
stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022
Lost 19.6% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 22.5%, back to its old high 18.3 months after the low

Dividends and income

Yield (last 12 months)1.29%distributions ÷ price
Paid in the last 12 months$0.44per share, split-adjusted
How oftenquarterly 
Latest payment$0.1200Sep 21, 2026
$0.342022$0.362023$0.372024$0.412025$0.332026*
$0.342022$0.362023$0.372024$0.412025$0.332026*
Distributions per share by calendar year, adjusted for a share split. * 2026 to Oct 27, 2026.
Show as a table
YearPer shareChange
2026 (to date)$0.3300
2025$0.4100+10.8%
2024$0.3700+2.8%
2023$0.3600+5.9%
2022$0.3400
Distributions through Oct 27, 2026.

What's inside

As of Aug 31, 2026, the fund held 354 securities; the ten largest made up 8.99% of assets. It also reported 11.12% in a money-market fund, most likely cash collateral from lending out shares rather than uninvested money.

HoldingWeight
Everpure Inc.1.09%
Twilio Inc.1.03%
Illumina, Inc.1.03%
Okta, Inc.0.99%
TechnipFMC PLC0.97%
ATI Inc.0.83%
nVent Electric PLC0.81%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.0.78%
Royal Gold, Inc.0.76%
XPO, Inc.0.71%
United Therapeutics Corp.0.71%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.0.70%
Entegris, Inc.0.69%
Carpenter Technology Corp.0.67%
US Foods Holding Corp.0.66%

By country

United States 94.11%Ireland 1.54%United Kingdom 1.29%Bermuda 1.23%Cayman Islands 0.93%

By asset type

Stocks 99.93%
Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Aug 31, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.

What changed recently

  • Over the three months to Aug 31, 2026, investors withdrew a net $318K (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
  • Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +3.74%, -2.08%, -0.45%.

How it works

QVMM tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index, built by S&P Dow Jones Indices. It starts with the S&P MidCap 400, a list of mid-size US companies, and gives each stock three scores. Quality looks at return on equity (profit compared with shareholders' money), the accruals ratio (how much of earnings rests on accounting entries rather than cash) and financial leverage (reliance on debt). For financial and real estate companies, the accruals measure is left out. Value compares book value, earnings and sales with the share price. Momentum looks at risk-adjusted price gains over a set past period.

The three scores are averaged. The 360 stocks with the highest combined scores, the top 90%, generally make the index. They are then weighted by float-adjusted market value, meaning the value of shares available to trade, so larger companies count for more. The result is a light screen, not a concentrated factor bet. As of October 31, 2025, the index had 359 stocks worth $870.5 million to $34.1 billion each.

The fund uses full replication: it owns essentially every index stock in index proportions, with at least 90% of assets in index securities. It does not try to beat the index and trades mainly when the index changes. Portfolio turnover was 34% in its latest reported year. It held no derivatives as of August 31, 2026.

What it really costs

  • QVMM charges 0.15% a year, versus an average of 0.13% for the similar funds below (5th of 9, cheapest first).
  • Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $15 in the first year and $192 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
Cost of $10,000 (SEC example)1 yr3 yrs5 yrs10 yrs
QVMM$15$48$85$192
SEC standard example: $10,000 invested, 5% annual return, shares sold at the end of each period.

In a retirement portfolio

RoleDiversifier

It adds a broad basket of mid-size US companies to portfolios that lean on large-cap stocks, but it is still an all-stock fund that falls with the market.

QVMM could add mid-size US companies to a portfolio built mainly on large-cap stocks. It launched June 30, 2021, so it has no record for the 2008 or 2020 crashes. In the 2022 bear market it fell 22.5% from January 4 to June 16, 2022. It did not regain its peak until December 26, 2023, about 18 months later. Its deepest drop, 24%, ran from November 25, 2024, to April 8, 2025, and took about eight months to recover. Its worst calendar year was 2022, down 13.02%. Selling shares or drawing income during stretches like these would mean selling after a fall. The yield was a modest 1.29% over the 12 months to October 27, 2026, paid quarterly. It costs 0.15% a year. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.

Planning to live on your savings? See whether your whole plan holds up, with your real accounts, taxes and Social Security, in ReadyAimRetire.
Run my plan →

Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere

May suit

  • Investors wanting broad US mid-cap exposure across 354 stocks, with a light filter that drops the lowest-scoring tenth of the S&P MidCap 400.
  • People who like rules-based quality, value and momentum screens but prefer size-based weighting over concentrated factor bets; no stock topped 1.1% as of August 31, 2026.
  • Long-term holders who can sit through swings like the 24% drop from November 2024 to April 2025 and need only modest quarterly income.

Look elsewhere if

  • Cost-focused investors: SPMD charges 0.03%, IJH 0.05% and IVOO 0.07% for S&P MidCap 400 exposure, versus QVMM's 0.15%.
  • Anyone seeking meaningful income; the trailing 12-month yield was 1.29% as of October 27, 2026.
  • Those wanting a distinct factor tilt or long record: it overlaps 88% with IVOO, has tracked it closely, and only launched in 2021.

Close alternatives

Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.

FundOverlapCostNet assets1 yr3 yr
QVMM this fund—0.15%$426.1M+12.5%+18.3%
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF88%0.07%$5.87B+12.0%+18.0%
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF86%0.03%$18.39B+15.3%+16.6%
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF86%0.05%$124.33B+15.3%+16.6%
MDY SPDR S&P Midcap 400 ETF Trust85%0.24%$28.05B+14.9%+16.3%
XJH iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF84%0.12%$419.5M+12.0%+17.8%
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened …70%0.15%$3.4M+14.7%+18.8%
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF62%0.15%$2.68B+12.1%+17.8%
Net assets from each fund's latest N-PORT or annual report where available. Returns through Oct 27, 2026.

Questions investors ask

What's the difference between QVMM and IVOO?

The main differences are the screen and the cost. Vanguard's IVOO follows the full S&P MidCap 400, while QVMM drops about the 10% of stocks with the weakest quality, value and momentum scores. Their holdings overlapped 88% in the latest reports. IVOO charges 0.07% against QVMM's 0.15%. As of October 27, 2026, QVMM returned 12.5% over one year and 18.3% a year over three years. IVOO returned 12% and 18%.

Does QVMM pay dividends?

Yes, QVMM pays dividends quarterly. Over the 12 months to October 27, 2026, it paid $0.44 per share, a yield of 1.29%. The payouts come from dividends paid by the mid-size companies it holds, so they can change from quarter to quarter. The fund is built around quality, value and momentum scores, not dividend yield, so investors focused mainly on income may find the payout small.

What is QVMM's expense ratio?

QVMM's expense ratio is 0.15% a year, according to its prospectus filed December 18, 2025, all of it a management fee. In the SEC's standard example, $10,000 invested with a 5% annual return would cost about $15 after one year, $85 after five years and $192 after ten. That is slightly above the 0.13% average for similar funds. Plain S&P 400 trackers like SPMD charge 0.03%.

What stocks are in QVMM?

As of August 31, 2026, QVMM held 354 stocks, mostly mid-size US companies. The largest were Everpure at 1.09%, Twilio at 1.03%, Illumina at 1.03%, Okta at 0.99% and TechnipFMC at 0.97%. The top 10 made up just 8.99% of the fund, so no single company dominates. About 94% was in US companies, with small slices in firms based in Ireland, the United Kingdom and Bermuda.

How did QVMM do in 2022?

QVMM lost 13.02% in 2022, its worst calendar year so far, according to its prospectus. At its low point, it was down 22.5% from January 4 to June 16, 2022, and it took until December 26, 2023, to recover. Its worst quarter was a 14.91% drop in the three months ending June 30, 2022. It rebounded 15.43% in 2023 and 13.46% in 2024.

Sources

  • 485BPOS prospectus (risk/return XBRL), filed Dec 18, 2025 — SEC EDGAR
  • N-PORT holdings report, filed Oct 30, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • Prices: daily prices and distributions through Oct 27, 2026

For education only, not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.