At a glance
LGRO charges 0.5% a year, above the 0.16% average of the 8 funds most like it (the 8th cheapest of 9). It has $134.9M in assets, the 9th largest of that group; it paid 0.32% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 2nd of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +27.6% a year. Its ten largest positions make up 43.2% of the fund, out of 48 in all.
The short version
Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF (LGRO) is an actively managed fund. Its sub-adviser, Level Four Capital Management, picks about 48 large US growth stocks, led by Apple, Microsoft and Alphabet as of May 31, 2026. Its 0.50% expense ratio is far above the 0.16% average for similar growth funds. Its 13.1% price return for the year to October 27, 2026 ranked 2nd of 9 among them. It is small, with about $135 million in net assets.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
LGRO +13.1% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGRO official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +18.12% | — | — | — | +23.84% |
| Bloomberg US 1000 Growth Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) index, same period | — | +17.93% | — | — | — | +24.73% |
| Bloomberg US 1000 Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) index, same period | — | +17.51% | — | — | — | +22.18% |
| LGRO price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +15.7% | +13.1% | +27.6% | — | — | +22.2% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, LGRO returned +13.1%, 2nd of 9 among similar funds.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2025 (+18.2%); its best was 2024 (+23.9%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 23.3% (Jan 28, 2025 to Apr 8, 2025), recovered by Jun 27, 2025.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +15.7% | — |
| 2025 | +18.2% | +18.12% |
| 2024 | +23.9% | +24.06% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Before this security existed |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Before this security existed |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.1000 | |
| 2025 | $0.1300 | 0.0% |
| 2024 | $0.1300 |
What's inside
As of May 31, 2026, the fund held 48 securities; the ten largest made up 43.24% of assets, and 5.01% sat in cash and money-market holdings.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 6.91% | |
| Microsoft Corp | 6.83% | |
| Alphabet Inc | 5.17% | |
| Amazon.com Inc | 5.11% | |
| Nvidia Corp | 4.28% | |
| Unitedhealth Group Inc | 3.45% | |
| Twilio Inc | 3.12% | |
| Paypal Holdings Inc | 2.91% | |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | 2.78% | |
| Micron Technology Inc | 2.69% | |
| Snowflake Inc | 2.69% | |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 2.46% | |
| Servicenow Inc | 2.39% | |
| Broadcom Inc | 2.36% | |
| Uber Technologies Inc | 2.36% |
By country
United States 94.98%By asset type
Stocks 94.98%By sector
Sectors of the companies held, for the 80.1% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of May 31, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.What changed recently
- Over the three months to May 31, 2026, investors added a net $4.2M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: -5.45%, +10.30%, +8.38%.
How it works
LGRO does not track an index. Its sub-adviser, Level Four Capital Management, picks what it calls high-quality US companies with growth potential and favors large, seasoned businesses. Under normal conditions, at least 80% of net assets goes into common stocks of companies worth more than $10 billion at the time of purchase. The Bloomberg US 1000 Growth Index serves only as a yardstick for performance. The fund normally stays in the top half of that index's size range, which ran from about $1.8 billion to $4.5 trillion as of December 31, 2025.
How much goes where is the managers' call. The team splits money among broad sector groups based on its own company research, its view of opportunities and its diversification and risk considerations. It can change those sector weights, or the sectors it invests in, at any time. The prospectus does not describe a fixed rebalancing schedule. Portfolio turnover, the share of holdings replaced over a year, was a modest 15%.
As of May 31, 2026, the fund held 48 stocks plus about 5% in cash, with no derivatives. The 10 largest positions made up 43% of assets. Apple (6.9%) and Microsoft (6.8%) led, followed by Alphabet, Amazon and Nvidia. Technology made up 38% of the holdings that had a sector classification. The fund may buy foreign stocks, but all of its stocks were US companies on that date.
What it really costs
- LGRO charges 0.5% a year, versus an average of 0.16% for the similar funds below (8th of 9, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $51 in the first year and $628 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGRO | $51 | $160 | $280 | $628 |
In a retirement portfolio
It is a concentrated, actively managed growth fund with a high fee and a short record, so it may fit better as a smaller add-on than as a portfolio's core.
LGRO could add a manager-picked tilt toward large US growth companies alongside a broad core fund. Its record is short. It launched in August 2023, so it has no history through the 2008 crisis, the 2020 COVID crash or the 2022 bear market. Its deepest drop was 23.3%, from January 28 to April 8, 2025. It was back at its peak by June 27, 2025, about 2.6 months later. Even its worst calendar year, 2025, was a gain of 18.12%. Still, anyone drawing cash during a slide like early 2025's would have cashed out shares at much lower prices. Income is minimal: a 0.32% trailing yield as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly. Its 0.50% fee compares with 0.04% for SCHG. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors who want a manager, not an index, choosing about 48 large US growth stocks, and who accept a 0.50% fee for that.
- Those comfortable with heavy technology exposure (38% of classified holdings) and top positions in Apple, Microsoft and Nvidia as of May 31, 2026.
- Long-term investors seeking growth rather than income, since the trailing yield was just 0.32%, paid quarterly, as of October 27, 2026.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-focused investors: index growth funds such as SCHG and VUG charge 0.04% a year, versus LGRO's 0.50%.
- Anyone wanting a record through the 2008, 2020 or 2022 downturns, since the fund launched in August 2023.
- Investors uneasy with sharp swings: it fell 23.3% in early 2025, and its one-year beta of 1.08 means it moved slightly more than the market.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGRO this fund | — | 0.5% | $134.9M | +13.1% | +27.6% |
| SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 46% | 0.04% | $63.03B | +2.2% | +23.0% |
| QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 45% | 0.28% | $2.65B | +12.3% | +30.1% |
| MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 44% | 0.07% | $33.30B | +2.5% | +23.2% |
| MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 43% | 0.07% | $10.90B | +13.5% | +26.0% |
| SPYG SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 43% | 0.04% | $52.99B | +7.2% | +25.3% |
| IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 43% | 0.18% | $74.97B | +7.0% | +25.2% |
| VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 43% | 0.04% | $379.29B | +3.8% | +25.1% |
Questions investors ask
Is LGRO actively managed?
Yes. LGRO does not track an index. Its sub-adviser, Level Four Capital Management, picks large US companies it views as high quality with growth potential, and it decides how much to put in each sector. Normally at least 80% of net assets is in companies worth more than $10 billion. The Bloomberg US 1000 Growth Index is used only to compare performance. Because the fund is active, results depend on the managers' choices, and there is no guarantee those choices will work.
What's the difference between LGRO and SCHG?
LGRO is actively managed, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) follows an index. SCHG charges 0.04% a year versus LGRO's 0.50%. SCHG is also far larger: about $63 billion as of August 31, 2026, against LGRO's roughly $135 million as of May 31, 2026. Their holdings overlap by about 46%. LGRO's one-year price return was 13.1% to October 27, 2026. SCHG's was 3.9% to October 30, 2026. Gaps over one year can reverse.
Does LGRO pay dividends?
Yes, but very little. LGRO pays distributions quarterly. Its trailing 12-month yield was 0.32%, or about $0.15 per share, as of October 27, 2026. A low yield is typical of growth stocks, because these companies tend to reinvest profits rather than pay large dividends. The fund's appeal is possible price growth, not income, so it provides little cash for anyone who depends on regular payouts.
What is LGRO's expense ratio?
LGRO's expense ratio is 0.50% a year, all of it a management fee, according to its prospectus filed March 30, 2026. That is well above the 0.16% average for similar funds and ranks 8th of 9 on cost. In the SEC's standard example, $10,000 invested at a 5% annual return would cost about $51 over one year, $160 over three years, $280 over five years and $628 over ten years.
Has LGRO beaten its benchmark?
It's been close. For 2025, LGRO returned 18.12%, compared with 17.93% for the Bloomberg US 1000 Growth Index, according to the prospectus. From its August 2023 launch through December 31, 2025, it averaged 23.84% a year. That trailed the growth index's 24.73% but beat the broader Bloomberg US 1000 Index's 22.18%. Index returns don't include fees, while the fund's returns do.