At a glance
IQM charges 0.5% a year, above the 0.44% average of the 8 funds most like it (the 6th cheapest of 9). It has $117.6M in assets, the 8th largest of that group. Over the past year it returned +5.2% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 8th of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +33.4% a year. At its worst it fell 40.4% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 16 months after the low. Its ten largest positions make up 42.4% of the fund, out of 76 in all.
The short version
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) is an actively managed Franklin Templeton fund. As of June 30, 2026, it held 76 stocks tied to automation, chips, industrial software and artificial intelligence. Its managers pick stocks through their own research and do not track an index. It costs 0.50% a year, above the 0.44% average of similar funds. It paid no distributions in the year to October 27, 2026, and its price has swung much harder than the broad market.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
IQM +5.2% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQM official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +30.62% | — | +15.07% | — | +23.88% |
| Russell 3000® Index index, same period | — | +17.15% | — | +13.15% | — | +15.36% |
| IQM price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +11.9% | +5.2% | +33.4% | +13.4% | — | +14.1% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, IQM returned +5.2%, 8th of 9 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was +13.4%.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2022 (-33.4%); its best was 2023 (+41.1%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 44.9% (Nov 19, 2021 to Oct 14, 2022), recovered by Mar 1, 2024.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +11.9% | — |
| 2025 | +30.8% | +30.62% |
| 2024 | +31.0% | +30.82% |
| 2023 | +41.1% | +41.00% |
| 2022 | -33.4% | -33.14% |
| 2021 | — | +25.25% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Before this security existed |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 40.4% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 40.4%, back to its old high 15.9 months after the low |
Dividends and income
No distribution history is available for this fund.
Distributions through Oct 27, 2026.What's inside
As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 76 securities; the ten largest made up 42.38% of assets, and 2.8% sat in cash and money-market holdings.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 6.58% | |
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LTD | 6.05% | |
| SANDISK CORP | 5.47% | |
| CELESTICA INC | 4.29% | |
| BROADCOM INC | 4.04% | |
| BLOOM ENERGY CORP | 3.59% | |
| GE VERNOVA INC | 3.39% | |
| TERADYNE INC | 3.02% | |
| APPLE INC | 3.02% | |
| LAM RESEARCH CORP | 2.94% | |
| KLA CORP | 2.75% | |
| TESLA INC | 2.69% | |
| APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 2.49% | |
| SK HYNIX INC | 1.98% | |
| ARISTA NETWORKS INC | 1.93% |
By country
United States 70.1%Taiwan 6.05%Canada 4.85%Netherlands 4.04%South Korea 3.93%By asset type
Stocks 97.22%By sector
Sectors of the companies held, for the 41.3% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jun 30, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors added a net $13.2M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +22.26%, +8.61%, +5.70%.
How it works
IQM does not track an index. Franklin Templeton's managers must keep at least 80% of net assets in companies tied to the fund's "intelligent machines" theme. These are firms the managers believe focus on, or stand to gain from, technology that changes how products are designed, made, shipped and maintained, including through artificial intelligence. The prospectus names four areas: intelligent design (simulation and computer-aided design software), intelligent production (factory automation), intelligent products (robotic-assisted tools) and predictive maintenance (industrial software that spots problems before machines fail). The fund can buy companies of any size, sector or country, including emerging markets. It expects to hold a large share in information technology.
Stock picking is "bottom-up." That means the managers study individual companies first instead of starting from an economic forecast. No formula sets the weights, and there is no fixed rebalancing date. The managers may sell a stock when it hits its price target or size limit, when its business weakens, when policy changes hurt its outlook, or when a better opportunity turns up. Portfolio turnover was 33%. The fund is "non-diversified," which means it can put more money into fewer companies than a typical fund.
As of June 30, 2026, the top 10 holdings made up 42% of the fund. The largest were NVIDIA (6.6%), Taiwan Semiconductor (6.1%), Sandisk (5.5%), Celestica (4.3%) and Broadcom (4.0%). About 70% was in US companies, and the fund held no derivatives.
What it really costs
- IQM charges 0.5% a year, versus an average of 0.44% for the similar funds below (6th of 9, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $51 in the first year and $629 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQM | $51 | $160 | $279 | $629 |
In a retirement portfolio
Its tight focus on chips and automation, its concentrated stock list and past drops of more than 40% make it a higher-risk add-on, not a foundation.
IQM could add a concentrated position in chips and automation next to broader funds, but its swings have been severe. Its deepest drop, 44.9%, ran from November 19, 2021, to October 14, 2022, and it did not regain its peak until March 1, 2024. In the 2022 bear market it fell 40.4%, and 2022 was its worst calendar year, with a 33.14% loss. It has no record from 2008, and its price history starts after the 2020 crash. Someone who had to sell shares in a year like 2022 would have locked in deep losses.
It paid no distributions in the year to October 27, 2026, so it provides no income. It costs 0.50% a year. In the SEC's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost $629 over 10 years. Past results don't predict future returns, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors who want a small, actively picked stake in chip, chip-equipment and automation companies such as NVIDIA, Taiwan Semiconductor, Lam Research and Teradyne.
- People who can sit through drops like the 44.9% fall from November 2021 to October 2022, which took until March 2024 to recover.
- Growth-focused investors who don't need income, since the fund paid no distributions in the year to October 27, 2026.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-conscious investors: IQM's 0.50% expense ratio is higher than XLK's 0.08% and the 0.35% charged by SMH and SOXX.
- Retirees who need stability or regular income: price swings (volatility) reached 39.1% over the year to October 27, 2026, with no distributions.
- Investors who already own broad tech funds: about a third of IQM's holdings overlap with XLK, IGM and IXN.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQM this fund | — | 0.5% | $117.6M | +5.2% | +33.4% |
| FFOG Franklin Focused Growth ETF FOCUSED GROWTH … | 54% | 0.55% | $311.7M | -0.4% | — |
| SEMI Columbia Select Technology ETF | 35% | 0.75% | $37.6M | +20.1% | +31.7% |
| XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund | 33% | 0.08% | $123.91B | +20.1% | +4.0% |
| IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 32% | 0.41% | $10.71B | +21.3% | +38.6% |
| IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 32% | 0.41% | $9.46B | +30.4% | +36.5% |
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 32% | 0.35% | $77.20B | +40.5% | +52.2% |
| TTEQ T. Rowe Price Technology ETF | 32% | 0.63% | $367.6M | +20.3% | — |
Questions investors ask
Is IQM good for retirement?
IQM is a higher-risk growth fund, so in a retirement portfolio it would usually be a small add-on, not a core holding. It aims for capital appreciation and paid no distributions in the year to October 27, 2026. It fell 44.9% from November 2021 to October 2022 and did not recover until March 2024. Someone selling shares to cover living costs in a downturn could lock in deep losses. Its 0.50% expense ratio is also above the 0.44% average of similar funds.
Does IQM pay dividends?
No. IQM paid no distributions in the year to October 27, 2026, so its yield over that period was 0%. The fund's objective is capital appreciation. As of June 30, 2026, its largest holdings were NVIDIA, Taiwan Semiconductor and Sandisk, chosen for growth potential rather than payouts. Investors who need regular cash from this fund would have to sell shares to get it.
What is IQM's expense ratio?
IQM's expense ratio is 0.50% a year, according to its prospectus filed July 27, 2026. All of it is management fee. That is above the 0.44% average of similar funds, and IQM ranks 6th cheapest of 9. Index funds with overlapping holdings cost less: XLK charges 0.08%, and SMH and SOXX charge 0.35%. In the SEC's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost $51 over one year, $279 over five years and $629 over 10 years.
What's the difference between IQM and FFOG?
Both are actively managed Franklin Templeton ETFs. About 54% of their holdings overlapped in the latest reports, which makes FFOG the closest match. IQM is built around its intelligent-machines theme, while FFOG is Franklin's focused growth ETF. IQM costs 0.50% a year and FFOG costs 0.55%. As of June 30, 2026, FFOG had $311.7 million in net assets and IQM had $117.6 million. Over the year to October 27, 2026, IQM returned 5.2% and FFOG lost 0.4%.
How has IQM performed?
As of December 31, 2025, IQM's average annual return was 30.62% over one year, 15.07% over five years and 23.88% since its February 2020 launch. The Russell 3000 Index returned 17.15%, 13.15% and 15.36% over the same periods. The ride was rough, including a 33.14% loss in 2022. Over the year to October 27, 2026, IQM's price return was 5.2%, which ranked 8th of 9 similar funds. SMH returned 44.1% in the year to October 30, 2026.