At a glance
XLK charges 0.08% a year, below the 0.32% average of the 8 funds most like it (the cheapest of 9). It has $123.91B in assets, the 2nd largest of that group; it paid 0.47% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned +20.1% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 3rd of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +4.0% a year. At its worst it fell 31.2% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 33.1% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 3 months and 8 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 64.5% of the fund, out of 74 in all.
The short version
Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) is a State Street index fund. It holds the technology stocks among the S&P 500's large US companies by tracking the Technology Select Sector Index. Its yearly fee, 0.08% of assets, was the lowest among nine similar tech funds compared; the other eight averaged 0.32%. It is also highly concentrated: its 10 largest holdings, led by NVIDIA, Apple and Microsoft, were 64% of assets as of June 30, 2026.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
XLK +20.1% over the year to Oct 30, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +24.60% | — | +18.11% | +22.34% | — |
| XLK price data to Oct 30, 2026 | +25.1% | +20.1% | +4.0% | +3.0% | +15.4% | +7.3% |
- Over the year to Oct 30, 2026, XLK returned +20.1%, 3rd of 9 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was +3.0% and its 10-year +15.4%.
- In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 31.2% and regained its old high 2.6 months after the low.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2000 (-41.9%); its best was 1999 (+65.1%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 82% (Mar 27, 2000 to Oct 9, 2002), recovered by May 15, 2017.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +25.1% | — |
| 2025 | -37.5% | +24.60% |
| 2024 | +21.6% | +21.62% |
| 2023 | +56.0% | +55.98% |
| 2022 | -27.7% | -27.71% |
| 2021 | +34.7% | +34.53% |
| 2020 | +43.6% | +43.57% |
| 2019 | +49.9% | +49.97% |
| 2018 | -1.6% | -1.57% |
| 2017 | +34.3% | +34.28% |
| 2016 | +15.0% | +14.82% |
| 2015 | +5.5% | — |
| 2014 | +17.9% | — |
| 2013 | +26.2% | — |
| 2012 | +14.7% | — |
| 2011 | +1.8% | — |
| 2010 | +10.6% | — |
| 2009 | +50.0% | — |
| 2008 | -41.9% | — |
| 2007 | +15.0% | — |
| 2006 | +11.7% | — |
| 2005 | -0.7% | — |
| 2004 | +4.6% | — |
| 2003 | +38.2% | — |
| 2002 | -38.3% | — |
| 2001 | -23.4% | — |
| 2000 | -41.9% | — |
| 1999 | +65.1% | — |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Lost 51.8% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 53.3%, back to its old high 38.4 months after the low |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Lost 31.2% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 31.2%, back to its old high 2.6 months after the low |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 33.1% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 33.1%, back to its old high 8.1 months after the low |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.6200 | |
| 2025 | $1.3500 | -11.8% |
| 2024 | $1.5300 | +4.8% |
| 2023 | $1.4600 | +12.3% |
| 2022 | $1.3000 | +16.1% |
| 2021 | $1.1200 | -6.7% |
| 2020 | $1.2000 | +13.2% |
| 2019 | $1.0600 | +6.0% |
| 2018 | $1.0000 | +13.6% |
| 2017 | $0.8800 | +3.5% |
| 2016 | $0.8500 | +11.8% |
| 2015 | $0.7600 | +4.1% |
| 2014 | $0.7300 | +21.7% |
| 2013 | $0.6000 | +77.8% |
| 2012 | $0.3375 | +75.3% |
| 2011 | $0.1925 | +19.2% |
| 2010 | $0.1615 | +2.9% |
| 2009 | $0.1570 | +38.3% |
| 2008 | $0.1135 | +17.0% |
| 2007 | $0.0970 | +8.4% |
| 2006 | $0.0895 | +20.9% |
| 2005 | $0.0740 | -64.6% |
| 2004 | $0.2090 | +196.5% |
| 2003 | $0.0705 | +243.9% |
| 2002 | $0.0205 | +4000.0% |
| 1999 | $0.0005 |
What's inside
As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 74 securities; the ten largest made up 64.45% of assets.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 14.65% | |
| Apple Inc | 12.85% | |
| Microsoft Corp | 8.38% | |
| Micron Technology Inc | 5.42% | |
| Broadcom Inc | 5.41% | |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.28% | |
| Intel Corp | 3.68% | |
| Applied Materials Inc | 3.20% | |
| Lam Research Corp | 3.02% | |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 2.58% | |
| KLA Corp | 2.20% | |
| Sandisk Corp | 1.88% | |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 1.54% | |
| Texas Instruments Inc | 1.51% | |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.49% |
By country
United States 97.24%Ireland 1.96%Netherlands 0.4%Singapore 0.33%By asset type
Stocks 99.93%By sector
Sectors of the companies held, for the 90.9% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jun 30, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors added a net $2.30B (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +19.92%, +19.80%, -0.13%.
How it works
XLK aims to match the price and yield performance of the Technology Select Sector Index, before expenses. S&P Dow Jones Indices picks the stocks and sets their weights. A company can only be included if it is in the S&P 500 and is classed as information technology under GICS, a standard system for sorting companies by industry. That covers semiconductors and chip equipment, software, hardware and storage, communications equipment, IT services and electronic components. The index held 70 stocks as of November 30, 2025.
The index weights stocks by market capitalization (share price times shares outstanding), so the biggest companies count most. It can trim very large single-stock weights to meet federal tax diversification rules for funds. Even so, as of June 30, 2026, NVIDIA was 14.7% of assets, Apple 12.8% and Microsoft 8.4%. The prospectus calls XLK "non-diversified": a few stocks can sway it heavily.
XLK uses replication. That means it holds substantially all the index's stocks in roughly the same proportions, and at least 95% of its assets must be in index stocks. The rest can sit in cash or money market funds; cash was 0.19% as of June 30, 2026. Turnover, roughly the share of holdings replaced in a year, was 5%. There is no leverage or options strategy. Like any exchange-traded fund (ETF), its market price can drift slightly from its net asset value (NAV), the per-share worth of its holdings.
What it really costs
- XLK charges 0.08% a year, versus an average of 0.32% for the similar funds below (1st of 9, cheapest first).
- Of that, 0.03% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $8 in the first year and $103 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | $8 | $26 | $45 | $103 |
In a retirement portfolio
It holds only S&P 500 technology stocks, with 64% of assets in its top 10 as of June 30, 2026, so it adds concentrated tech exposure rather than broad diversification.
XLK adds focused exposure to large US technology companies at low cost: 0.08% a year. In the SEC's standard example of $10,000 growing 5% a year, total costs would be $8 after one year and $103 after ten. Income is small: a 0.44% trailing 12-month yield as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly.
XLK fell 53.3% in the 2008 financial crisis and took about 38 months to recover. It lost 31.2% in the 2020 COVID crash and 33.1% in the 2022 bear market, recovering in about 2.6 and 8 months. Its worst calendar year was 2000, a 41.9% loss. Its deepest fall, 82% from March 2000 to October 2002, was not recovered until May 2017. With little income, withdrawals in a slump mean cashing out shares at depressed prices. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Cost-conscious investors seeking S&P 500 technology stocks: the 0.08% expense ratio was the lowest of nine similar tech funds compared.
- Investors adding a tech tilt beside a diversified core who accept heavy concentration: NVIDIA alone was 14.7% of assets as of June 30, 2026.
- Long-horizon investors who can ride out deep drops; the fund fell 82% from 2000 to 2002 and regained that peak only in May 2017.
Look elsewhere if
- Income seekers: the trailing yield was 0.44% as of October 27, 2026, so spending money would mostly come from cashing out shares.
- Investors wanting broad diversification: XLK holds only S&P 500 tech companies, and its top 10 made up 64% of assets as of June 30, 2026.
- Retirees likely to withdraw money in a downturn: XLK fell 53.3% in 2007–2008 and took about 38 months to recover.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK this fund | — | 0.08% | $123.91B | +20.1% | +4.0% |
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index … | 79% | 0.084% | $19.85B | +15.4% | +30.0% |
| VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 78% | 0.09% | $170.66B | +19.7% | +33.3% |
| IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 76% | 0.41% | $10.71B | +21.3% | +38.6% |
| IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 75% | 0.39% | $23.58B | +13.9% | +30.4% |
| IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 75% | 0.41% | $9.46B | +30.4% | +36.5% |
| QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 65% | 0.2% | $300.0M | +16.1% | — |
| SEMI Columbia Select Technology ETF | 62% | 0.75% | $37.6M | +20.1% | +31.7% |
Questions investors ask
What's the difference between XLK and VGT?
The differences are small. About 81% of the two funds' holdings overlapped in their latest holdings reports to the SEC. XLK charges 0.08% a year, versus 0.09% for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT), and XLK's index includes only S&P 500 members. VGT was larger, with $171.8 billion in net assets as of May 31, 2026, against XLK's $123.9 billion as of June 30, 2026. One-year returns through October 27, 2026 were close: 27.4% for XLK and 26.1% for VGT.
Does XLK pay dividends?
Yes, but not much. XLK pays dividends quarterly. Over the 12 months to October 27, 2026, it paid $0.84 per share, a trailing yield of 0.44%. Yield here means a year of dividends divided by the share price. The fund is designed to track technology stocks, not to produce income. Someone relying on it for spending money would mostly be cashing out shares rather than living on dividends.
Is XLK good for retirement?
It can play a supporting role, but it is a concentrated sector fund, not an all-in-one holding. Costs are low at 0.08% a year. But the yield was only 0.44% as of October 27, 2026, and the swings have been large. XLK fell 82% from March 2000 to October 2002 and did not regain that peak until May 2017. It also dropped 33.1% from peak to low in 2022. It may suit a smaller slice of a portfolio built on more diversified holdings.
What are XLK's top holdings?
As of June 30, 2026, the largest holdings were NVIDIA (14.7% of assets), Apple (12.8%), Microsoft (8.4%), Micron Technology (5.4%), Broadcom (5.4%) and Advanced Micro Devices (5.3%). Intel, Applied Materials, Lam Research and Cisco Systems completed the top 10, which together made up 64% of the fund. About 97% of assets were in US-based companies, with small stakes in companies based in Ireland, the Netherlands and Singapore.
How has XLK performed over the last 10 years?
Strongly, though unevenly. Its January 2026 prospectus shows an average annual return of 22.34% for the 10 years ended December 31, 2025. The figures were 18.11% over five years and 24.6% over one year. Calendar years swung from a 55.98% gain in 2023 to a 27.71% loss in 2022. Its strongest quarter gained 30.43% (April–June 2020) and its weakest lost 19.7% (April–June 2022). From the start of 2026 through October 27, it returned 32.1%. Past returns don't predict future results.