Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF

GGTLGabelliEquity

Formerly GAST. Until Dec 15, 2025 this fund traded as GAST (Gabelli Automation ETF), with a different strategy; returns from before then come from the old strategy. SEC filing.

Expense ratio0%
Net assets$13.3M
Holdings65
Yield (TTM)0.86%
1 week+1.5%
1 month-5.8%
3 months+4.5%
6 months+8.2%
YTD+20.1%
1 year+19.0%
3 years*+21.9%

Total returns with distributions reinvested; * a year. Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 · filings through Jun 30, 2026 · page updated Nov 3, 2026

At a glance

GGTL charges 0.0% a year, below the 0.28% average of the 6 funds most like it (the cheapest of 7). It has $13.3M in assets, the 7th largest of that group; it paid 0.86% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, annual. Over the past year it returned +19.0% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), the best of those 7 funds; over three years it returned +21.9% a year. Its ten largest positions make up 42.1% of the fund, out of 65 in all.

The short version

Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) is an actively managed GAMCO Investors fund that holds technology stocks from around the world. As of June 30, 2026, Taiwan Semiconductor was its largest holding, Japan made up 29.7% of assets, and net assets were a small $13.3 million. Its 0.9% management fee was fully waived for a 0% expense ratio in the April 30, 2026 prospectus, but the SEC's $10,000 example shows $1,047 in costs over 10 years.

Price history

The interactive chart needs JavaScript.

GGTL +19.0% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.

Prices through Oct 27, 2026. Total return: the price with distributions reinvested.

How it has behaved

Volatility (1 year)23.6%annualized; the S&P 500 is usually 15–20%
Worst drop (1 year)-17.9%3 years: -21.5% · all history: -23.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.40moves more than the market
Sharpe ratio (1 year)0.64return above cash per unit of risk
Since launch+10.0%a year over 4.8 years
52-week range$29.94 – $42.32
Last price $38.38 on Oct 27, 2026, 9.3% below the 52-week high · above its 200-day average ($35.96).
YTD1 yr3 yr5 yr10 yrSince start
GGTL official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025—+19.78%———+7.24%
S&P 500 Index index, same period—+17.88%———+11.53%
GGTL price data to Oct 27, 2026+20.1%+19.0%+21.9%——+10.0%
Multi-year figures are annualized total returns with distributions reinvested. "Official" figures are the SEC-standard returns from the fund's prospectus; the price-data row is computed from daily prices.
  • Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, GGTL returned +19.0%, 1st of 7 among similar funds.
  • Its worst full calendar year was 2024 (+11.1%); its best was 2025 (+19.8%).
  • The deepest fall in its price history was 23.6% (Jan 6, 2022 to Sep 27, 2022), recovered by Feb 15, 2024.
-16%202218%202311%202420%202520%2026*
-16%202218%202311%202420%202520%2026*
Calendar-year total returns from price data, distributions reinvested. * 2026 is year to date. From the prospectus: best quarter +8.51% (Dec 31, 2023), worst -3.38% (Jun 30, 2024).
Show as a table
YearPrice dataProspectus (official)
2026 (to date)+20.1%—
2025+19.8%+19.78%
2024+11.1%+10.99%
2023+18.2%+18.23%
2022-16.2%—
2008 financial crisis
stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009
Before this security existed
2020 COVID crash
stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020
Before this security existed
2022 bear market
stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022
Before this security existed

Dividends and income

Yield (last 12 months)0.86%distributions ÷ price
Paid in the last 12 months$0.33per share, split-adjusted
How oftenannual 
Latest payment$0.3300Dec 29, 2025
$0.162022$0.212023$0.202024$0.332025
$0.162022$0.212023$0.202024$0.332025
Distributions per share by calendar year, adjusted for a share split. * 2026 to Oct 27, 2026.
Show as a table
YearPer shareChange
2025$0.3300+65.0%
2024$0.2000-4.8%
2023$0.2100+31.3%
2022$0.1600
Distributions through Oct 27, 2026.

What's inside

As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 65 securities; the ten largest made up 42.13% of assets.

HoldingWeight
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LTD8.94%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT Bonds and notes6.04%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC4.87%
ORACLE CORP3.84%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT Bonds and notes3.46%
RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORP3.37%
BROADCOM INC3.17%
SONY GROUP CORP3.14%
ARISTA NETWORKS INC2.96%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC2.33%
NVIDIA CORP2.33%
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD2.30%
ADVANTEST CORP2.09%
FORTINET INC1.92%
SCREEN HOLDINGS CO LTD1.64%

By country

United States 45.98%Japan 29.66%Taiwan 13.03%Israel 2.77%South Korea 2.67%

By asset type

Stocks 87.58%Bonds and notes 9.5%
Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jun 30, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.

What changed recently

  • Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors added a net $0.00 (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
  • Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +14.63%, +14.12%, +0.99%.

How it works

GGTL tracks no index; GAMCO's managers pick the stocks. At least 80% of assets go to technology companies, meaning firms with half their revenue or assets in areas such as software, semiconductors or communications equipment. It normally keeps at least 40% in non-U.S. companies, held directly or through American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), U.S.-traded certificates for foreign shares.

They favor industry leaders with high returns on capital, proprietary technology or strong research records. Then comes a value test: does the stock trade below its private market value, the price an informed purchaser would pay for the whole business? They also want a catalyst, such as a spin-off or management change, that could close the gap, and exit when a price target is reached or the outlook worsens. Portfolio turnover was 37% in the April 2026 prospectus, meaning roughly a third of holdings changed over a year.

As of June 30, 2026, it held 65 positions, with 42% in the top 10, led by Taiwan Semiconductor (8.9%), AMD (4.9%) and Oracle (3.8%). About 9.5% sat in short-term U.S. Treasury bills, a cash-like holding. Options may be used for extra return or to hedge against losses, but none were held. The stated goal is high total return mainly from current income, yet the trailing yield was 0.86% as of October 27, 2026.

What it really costs

  • GGTL charges 0% a year, versus an average of 0.28% for the similar funds below (1st of 7, cheapest first).
  • Of that, 0.9% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
  • The fee includes a 0.9% waiver from the adviser, which may end.
  • Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $0 in the first year and $1,047 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
Cost of $10,000 (SEC example)1 yr3 yrs5 yrs10 yrs
GGTL$0$202$420$1,047
SEC standard example: $10,000 invested, 5% annual return, shares sold at the end of each period.

In a retirement portfolio

RoleSatellite (higher risk)

It is a concentrated technology fund that tended to move about 1.4 times as much as the stock market in the year to October 27, 2026.

GGTL could add global technology exposure, but its record is short. It launched on January 5, 2022, after the 2008 and 2020 crashes, then fell 23.6% by September 27 in the 2022 market slump, ending that year down about 16%. It took about 17 months from that low to regain its old high, in February 2024. Withdrawals in late 2022 would have meant cashing out shares at depressed prices. Its weakest full calendar year since then, 2024, gained about 11%.

Income is small: a 0.86% yield as of October 27, 2026, paid once a year. Costs are 0% while the 0.90% fee waiver lasts; the SEC's $10,000 example shows $1,047 in costs over 10 years. From launch through 2025, it returned 7.24% a year versus 11.53% for the S&P 500. Past results don't predict future ones, and a plan needs to look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.

Planning to live on your savings? See whether your whole plan holds up, with your real accounts, taxes and Social Security, in ReadyAimRetire.
Run my plan →

Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere

May suit

  • Investors wanting technology stocks beyond the U.S., with about 30% in Japan and 13% in Taiwan as of June 30, 2026.
  • Those wanting an actively managed, value-minded tech fund whose 0.90% management fee is fully waived, for 0% net costs per the April 2026 prospectus.
  • Long-term investors adding a small, higher-risk slice who can sit through drops like the 23.6% fall in 2022 and its 17-month recovery.

Look elsewhere if

  • Income seekers: the trailing yield was 0.86% as of October 27, 2026, and distributions come only once a year.
  • Anyone wanting a diversified core holding: at least 80% of assets go to technology, so one sector's slump hits the whole fund.
  • Those wary of tiny funds, which can trade thinly or close: net assets were $13.3 million as of June 30, 2026.

Close alternatives

Matched by closest holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports (no similar fund shares 20% or more of its holdings).

FundOverlapCostNet assets1 yr3 yr
GGTL this fund—0%$13.3M+19.0%+21.9%
JXX Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF21%0.57%$26.7M+1.8%—
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF12%0.06%$97.88B+12.5%+22.2%
BEEX Beehive ETF12%0.84%$192.4M+6.7%—
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF5%0.09%$160.90B+11.7%+19.8%
VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Index Fund5%0.04%$95.84B+13.4%+20.6%
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock…5%0.07%$58.39B+13.8%+19.5%
Net assets from each fund's latest N-PORT or annual report where available. Returns through Oct 27, 2026.

Questions investors ask

What does GGTL invest in?

GGTL invests mainly in technology stocks from the U.S., Japan and Taiwan. As of June 30, 2026, its largest holdings were Taiwan Semiconductor (8.9%), AMD (4.9%), Oracle (3.8%), Renesas Electronics (3.4%), Broadcom (3.2%) and Sony (3.1%). Its 65 positions included about 9.5% in short-term U.S. Treasury bills. By country, the U.S. made up 46% of assets, Japan 30% and Taiwan 13%, with smaller stakes in Israel and South Korea.

What is GGTL's expense ratio?

GGTL's net expense ratio, the yearly cost taken from fund assets, was 0% in its April 30, 2026 prospectus, because the adviser waives the entire 0.90% management fee. The six funds with the most overlapping holdings averaged 0.28%. The 0% figure depends on that waiver: the SEC's standard example, which assumes $10,000 invested and 5% yearly returns, shows $0 in costs after one year but $202 after three, $420 after five and $1,047 after ten.

Is GGTL good for retirement?

It may fit only as a small, higher-risk slice, not a core holding. At least 80% of its assets go to technology, it fell 23.6% between January and September 2022, and it took about 17 months from that low to recover. Income is modest: the trailing yield was 0.86% as of October 27, 2026, paid once a year. Retirees who need steady income or stability may find broader or income-focused funds a closer fit.

GGTL vs JXX: what's the difference?

The biggest differences are cost and results. Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF (JXX) is GGTL's closest match by holdings, yet only about a fifth of their holdings overlap. JXX charges 0.57% a year versus GGTL's 0% net expense ratio, which relies on a fee waiver. Over the year to October 27, 2026, GGTL returned 19% and JXX 1.8%. Both are small: GGTL had $13.3 million in net assets on June 30, 2026, and JXX about $26.7 million on July 31, 2026.

Has GGTL beaten the S&P 500?

Not since launch, based on prospectus figures through December 31, 2025. Over that span GGTL returned 7.24% a year versus 11.53% for the S&P 500, though in 2025 it beat the index, 19.78% to 17.88%. Based on share prices, it returned 21.9% a year over the three years to October 27, 2026, and 20.1% in 2026 through that date. Past results don't predict future ones.

Sources

  • 485BPOS prospectus (risk/return XBRL), filed Apr 30, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • N-PORT holdings report, filed Aug 31, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • Prices: daily prices and distributions through Oct 27, 2026

For education only, not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.