At a glance
DFUV charges 0.21% a year, above the 0.12% average of the 8 funds most like it (the 7th cheapest of 9). It has $15.43B in assets, the 7th largest of that group; it paid 1.3% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned +28.9% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 2nd of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +21.4% a year. Its ten largest positions make up 25.9% of the fund, out of 1,334 in all.
The short version
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) is an actively managed fund. As of July 31, 2026, it held about 1,334 US value stocks of all sizes, picked by Dimensional rather than copied from an index. It leans toward cheaper, more profitable and smaller companies, and it is run to keep capital gains taxes low. It costs 0.21% a year, more than index-based value funds such as Vanguard Value ETF at 0.04%.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
DFUV +28.9% over the year to Nov 2, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFUV official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +15.71% | — | +11.18% | +10.52% | — |
| Russell 3000® Value Index index, same period | — | +15.71% | — | +11.18% | +10.46% | — |
| Russell 3000® Index index, same period | — | +17.15% | — | +13.15% | +14.29% | — |
| DFUV price data to Nov 2, 2026 | +23.3% | +28.9% | +21.4% | — | — | +14.3% |
- Over the year to Nov 2, 2026, DFUV returned +28.9%, 2nd of 9 among similar funds.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2024 (+11.8%); its best was 2025 (+15.8%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 17.6% (Nov 25, 2024 to Apr 8, 2025), recovered by Aug 22, 2025.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +23.3% | — |
| 2025 | +15.8% | +15.71% |
| 2024 | +11.8% | +11.87% |
| 2023 | +13.3% | +13.11% |
| 2022 | — | -7.83% |
| 2021 | — | +25.91% |
| 2020 | — | +1.80% |
| 2019 | — | +27.11% |
| 2018 | — | -10.06% |
| 2017 | — | +17.15% |
| 2016 | — | +17.37% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Before this security existed |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Before this security existed |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.5800 | |
| 2025 | $0.7300 | +7.4% |
| 2024 | $0.6800 | +6.3% |
| 2023 | $0.6400 |
What's inside
As of Jul 31, 2026, the fund held 1,334 securities; the ten largest made up 25.87% of assets.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. | 4.50% | |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. | 3.47% | |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORPORATION | 3.22% | |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 2.86% | |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 2.86% | |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. | 2.72% | |
| CHEVRON CORPORATION | 2.00% | |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. | 1.50% | |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | 1.42% | |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION | 1.33% | |
| LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY | 1.20% | |
| INTEL CORPORATION | 1.19% | |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. | 1.17% | |
| RTX CORPORATION | 1.07% | |
| THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. | 1.04% |
By country
United States 93.17%Ireland 3.4%Bermuda 0.99%Switzerland 0.81%Curaçao 0.4%By asset type
Stocks 99.83%Other 0%By sector
Sectors of the companies held, for the 65.9% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jul 31, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jul 31, 2026, investors withdrew a net $32.2M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +3.52%, +2.95%, +0.88%.
How it works
DFUV does not track an index. Dimensional's managers choose from US companies of every size. They look for "value" stocks, meaning shares with a low price compared with book value (a company's net worth on its balance sheet). They may also look at price compared with cash flow or earnings. Holdings are weighted mostly by market capitalization (share price times shares outstanding), so bigger companies get bigger positions. The fund may also lean further toward smaller companies, cheaper stocks and highly profitable ones. Under normal conditions, at least 80% of net assets is in US companies. As of July 31, 2026, the largest holdings were JPMorgan Chase (4.5%), Amazon (3.5%), ExxonMobil (3.2%) and Johnson & Johnson (2.9%). The top 10 made up about 26% of assets.
The managers also use shorter-term signals. They may add to, trim or skip a stock based on price momentum, short-term price reversals, or how fast a company is growing its assets. There is no fixed rebalancing date. Instead, they trade flexibly to keep trading costs down. The prospectus reports turnover of 5%.
The fund is tax-managed. It tries to put off realizing capital gains, sells losing stocks to offset gains, and aims to keep any realized gains long-term. It may use futures to stay fully invested when money flows in or out. It also lends out securities for extra income, which carries a small risk that a borrower fails to return them.
What it really costs
- DFUV charges 0.21% a year, versus an average of 0.12% for the similar funds below (7th of 9, cheapest first).
- Of that, 0.2% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $22 in the first year and $268 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFUV | $22 | $68 | $118 | $268 |
In a retirement portfolio
With about 1,334 US stocks of all sizes, low turnover and a tax-managed approach, it could serve as the value part of a core US stock allocation.
DFUV could add a broad tilt toward cheaper US stocks alongside growth-heavy index funds. Its prospectus record goes back before the ETF's May 2022 launch. That record shows a worst quarter of -30.33% in early 2020 and calendar-year losses of 10.06% in 2018 and 7.83% in 2022. It does not cover 2008. Since launch, its deepest drop was 17.6%, from November 2024 to April 2025, and it recovered in about 4.5 months. Anyone drawing money from it in those stretches would have been selling shares at lower prices. The yield was 1.29% as of October 29, 2026, paid quarterly, so it is not a large source of income. It costs 0.21% a year. In the SEC's standard example, that comes to $268 over 10 years on $10,000. Past results don't predict future ones, and a retirement plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors wanting a value tilt across about 1,334 US stocks of all sizes, not just large companies.
- Taxable-account holders drawn to a tax-managed approach that aims to delay capital gains, with 5% turnover per the prospectus.
- Those comfortable with active stock picking that favors cheaper, more profitable companies, and with paying 0.21% a year for it.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-focused investors: Vanguard Value ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF each charge 0.04%, compared with DFUV's 0.21%.
- Retirees looking for meaningful income: the trailing yield was 1.29% as of October 29, 2026, paid quarterly.
- Anyone wanting the whole market: over 10 years to December 31, 2025, it returned 10.52% a year, versus 14.29% for the Russell 3000 Index.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFUV this fund | — | 0.21% | $15.43B | +28.9% | +21.4% |
| DFLV Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF | 75% | 0.22% | $6.77B | +27.5% | +23.4% |
| VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 55% | 0.04% | $254.48B | +25.4% | +22.3% |
| GVUS Marketbeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 55% | 0.12% | $416.9M | +26.6% | — |
| VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | 55% | 0.07% | $23.88B | +29.0% | +23.6% |
| SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 54% | 0.04% | $15.67B | +22.4% | +20.3% |
| IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 53% | 0.19% | $79.74B | +28.8% | +22.2% |
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | 53% | 0.25% | $27.57B | +25.0% | +22.7% |
Questions investors ask
Is DFUV good for retirement?
It can play a part, but it is a stock fund and rises and falls with the market. As of July 31, 2026, DFUV held about 1,334 US value stocks. It costs 0.21% a year. Its prospectus record shows a 30.33% drop in the first quarter of 2020 and a 7.83% loss in 2022. The yield was 1.29% as of October 29, 2026, so retirees who rely on income may need other sources or may have to sell shares.
What's the difference between DFUV and DFLV?
As its name suggests, Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) focuses on large companies. DFUV looks at US companies of all sizes and may lean toward smaller ones. About 75% of their holdings overlap. Costs are almost the same: 0.22% for DFLV and 0.21% for DFUV. Over one year to late October 2026, DFUV returned 29.5% and DFLV 27.5%. Their three-year annualized returns were 23.5% and 23.4%.
Does DFUV pay dividends?
Yes, DFUV pays dividends every quarter. Over the 12 months to October 29, 2026, it paid about $0.74 per share, a yield of 1.29%. That is modest, because the fund's goal is long-term growth, not income. Its tax-managed approach also tries to keep capital gains payouts low. When it does realize gains, it aims to make them long-term, which are taxed at lower rates.
Is DFUV an index fund?
No. DFUV is an actively managed ETF and does not try to copy an index. Dimensional picks value stocks based on price compared with book value, profitability, company size and shorter-term signals such as momentum. The prospectus compares it with the Russell 3000 Value Index. Over the 10 years to December 31, 2025, the fund returned 10.52% a year and the index 10.46%. Those figures include history from before the ETF's May 2022 launch.
How much does DFUV cost compared with VTV?
DFUV's expense ratio is 0.21%, compared with 0.04% for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). In the SEC's standard example ($10,000 earning 5% a year), DFUV would cost about $22 in the first year and $268 over 10 years. About 55% of the two funds' holdings overlap. Over one year to October 29, 2026, DFUV returned 29.5% and VTV 25.6%. Short-term results like these may not last.