At a glance
AMLP charges 1.01% a year, above the 0.83% average of the 7 funds most like it (the 7th cheapest of 8). It has $12.14B in assets, the largest of that group; it paid 7.66% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 6th of those 8 funds; over three years it returned +17.4% a year. At its worst it fell 63.7% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 20.9% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 14 months and 4 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 100.9% of the fund, out of 13 in all.
The short version
Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) tracks the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. The index holds master limited partnerships (MLPs), which are exchange-traded partnerships that own US energy pipelines, storage and processing assets. Unlike most funds, AMLP is taxed as a regular corporation. Its trailing yield was 7.66% as of October 27, 2026, and it was the largest fund in its peer group as of May 31, 2026. Its 1.01% expense ratio is well above the 0.83% peer average.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
AMLP +22.5% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMLP official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +5.88% | — | +22.43% | +6.19% | — |
| Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) index, same period | — | +8.14% | — | +25.71% | +8.15% | — |
| Alerian MLP Index* (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) index, same period | — | +9.76% | — | +25.96% | +8.85% | — |
| Bloomberg US 1000 Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) index, same period | — | +17.51% | — | +13.47% | +14.55% | — |
| AMLP price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +19.6% | +22.5% | +17.4% | +17.2% | +7.0% | +5.8% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, AMLP returned +22.5%, 6th of 8 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was +17.2% and its 10-year +7.0%.
- In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 63.7% and regained its old high 13.7 months after the low.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2020 (-32.2%); its best was 2021 (+39.0%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 77.1% (Aug 29, 2014 to Mar 18, 2020), recovered by Nov 30, 2023.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +19.6% | — |
| 2025 | +5.8% | +5.88% |
| 2024 | +22.7% | +22.61% |
| 2023 | +21.4% | +21.39% |
| 2022 | +25.5% | +25.12% |
| 2021 | +39.0% | +39.49% |
| 2020 | -32.2% | -32.53% |
| 2019 | +6.2% | +5.95% |
| 2018 | -12.6% | -12.67% |
| 2017 | -7.8% | -7.80% |
| 2016 | +14.9% | +15.15% |
| 2015 | -25.7% | — |
| 2014 | +4.8% | — |
| 2013 | +18.5% | — |
| 2012 | +1.9% | — |
| 2011 | +10.1% | — |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Lost 59.7% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 63.7%, back to its old high 13.7 months after the low |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Gained 19.2% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 20.9%, back to its old high 4.2 months after the low |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $3.0700 | |
| 2025 | $3.9300 | +5.9% |
| 2024 | $3.7100 | +11.1% |
| 2023 | $3.3400 | +14.0% |
| 2022 | $2.9300 | +4.6% |
| 2021 | $2.8000 | -11.4% |
| 2020 | $3.1600 | -20.0% |
| 2019 | $3.9500 | -3.7% |
| 2018 | $4.1000 | -6.8% |
| 2017 | $4.4000 | -13.7% |
| 2016 | $5.1000 | -14.3% |
| 2015 | $5.9500 | +5.3% |
| 2014 | $5.6500 | +6.6% |
| 2013 | $5.3000 | +6.0% |
| 2012 | $5.0000 | 0.0% |
| 2011 | $5.0000 |
What's inside
As of May 31, 2026, the fund held 13 securities; the ten largest made up 100.92% of assets.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Plains All American Pipeline Lp | 13.67% | |
| Western Midstream Partners Lp | 13.63% | |
| Sunoco Lp | 13.37% | |
| Energy Transfer Lp | 13.34% | |
| Enterprise Products Partners Lp | 12.98% | |
| Mplx Lp | 12.09% | |
| Hess Midstream Lp | 9.53% | |
| Cheniere Energy Partners Lp | 4.69% | |
| Usa Compression Partners Lp | 4.39% | |
| Genesis Energy Lp | 3.23% | |
| Suburban Propane Partners Lp | 2.49% | |
| Global Partners Lp/ma | 2.39% | |
| Delek Logistics Partners Lp | 1.87% |
By country
United States 107.68%By asset type
Stocks 107.68%What changed recently
- Over the three months to May 31, 2026, investors added a net $424.4M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +1.00%, +2.87%, -2.73%.
How it works
AMLP is an index fund. Before fees and expenses, it aims to match the price and yield performance of the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, which was built by Alerian. The index holds energy infrastructure MLPs that earn most of their cash flow from moving, storing and processing energy commodities. Holdings are weighted by market value, counting only units available to trade ("float adjusted"), with modifications set by the index rules. The fund normally invests at least 90% of its total assets in index securities.
The result is a very concentrated fund. As of May 31, 2026, it held 13 partnerships. Six of them each made up 12% to 14% of assets: Plains All American Pipeline, Western Midstream Partners, Sunoco, Energy Transfer, Enterprise Products Partners and MPLX. The fund is non-diversified, so one holding's slump can move the share price sharply. Turnover was 14%.
The tax setup is the key mechanical difference. Because AMLP owns mostly MLPs, it cannot be taxed like a typical fund. Instead it pays corporate income tax, and its net asset value is reduced by current and deferred tax accruals. The index ignores taxes, so the fund can trail it by a wide margin. Holders get a Form 1099 rather than partnership tax forms, but they lose the 20% deduction available to direct MLP owners.
What it really costs
- AMLP charges 1.01% a year, versus an average of 0.83% for the similar funds below (7th of 8, cheapest first).
- Of that, 0.84% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $103 in the first year and $1,235 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMLP | $103 | $321 | $558 | $1,235 |
In a retirement portfolio
It offers high income from a narrow group of 13 US energy partnerships, but its history includes deep, slow-to-recover losses.
AMLP could add high income and exposure to US energy pipelines and storage. Its trailing yield was 7.66% as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly. During the 2022 bear market it gained 19.2% while stocks fell. Its losses, though, have been severe. It launched in 2010, so it has no 2008 record. In the 2020 crash it fell 63.7% in under a month and took about 14 months to regain its peak. Its deepest drop, 77.1% from August 2014 to March 2020, did not fully recover until November 2023. Its worst calendar year was 2020, at -32.5%. Anyone who had to draw cash in a year like that would have been locking in large losses.
It costs 1.01% a year. Under the SEC's standard example, that is about $103 on $10,000 in the first year. Past results don't predict future ones. A plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Income-focused investors comfortable getting a 7.66% trailing yield (as of October 27, 2026) from just 13 US energy partnerships.
- Investors who want MLP exposure with a single Form 1099, including in IRAs, since holders aren't treated as running the MLPs' businesses.
- Those who value fund size: at $12.1 billion in net assets as of May 31, 2026, AMLP was the largest in its peer group.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-conscious investors: the 1.01% expense ratio ranks 7th of 8 peers, against 0.45% for MLPA, whose holdings overlap 99%.
- Anyone who can't tolerate deep, lasting losses: AMLP fell 77.1% from 2014 to 2020 and didn't recover until November 2023.
- Investors who want broad diversification: six partnerships each made up 12% to 14% of assets, all in US energy infrastructure.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMLP this fund | — | 1.01% | $12.14B | +22.5% | +17.4% |
| MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 98% | 0.45% | $2.39B | +22.1% | +15.9% |
| AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 92% | 2.18% | $471.8M | +34.5% | +21.9% |
| ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 27% | 0.35% | $548.4M | +35.1% | +27.7% |
| MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 26% | 0.45% | $3.68B | +32.9% | +27.2% |
| EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastru… | 24% | 0.95% | $4.13B | +18.7% | +22.9% |
| NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infras… | 23% | 0.65% | $47.3M | +35.7% | — |
| USAI Pacer American Energy Independence ETF | 22% | 0.75% | $132.8M | +31.4% | +25.8% |
Questions investors ask
Does AMLP pay monthly dividends?
No. AMLP pays distributions quarterly. Over the 12 months to October 27, 2026, it paid $4.07 per share, a trailing yield of 7.66%. Part of each payment may count as a return of capital. That part isn't taxed when you receive it, but it lowers your cost basis, which can mean a larger taxable gain when the shares are eventually sold.
Does AMLP send a K-1?
No. Owning MLPs directly usually means receiving a K-1 partnership tax form, but AMLP reports distributions on a standard Form 1099. The trade-off is that the fund itself is taxed as a regular corporation. It pays corporate income tax and accrues deferred tax that reduces its net asset value. Holders also lose the 20% deduction available to individuals who own MLP units directly. Fund holders aren't treated as running the MLPs' businesses for unrelated business income tax purposes.
What's the difference between AMLP and MLPA?
They hold nearly the same partnerships: their holdings overlapped by 99% in the latest N-PORT reports. The main difference is cost. AMLP's expense ratio is 1.01%, compared with 0.45% for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Even so, as of October 27, 2026, AMLP returned 22.5% over one year and 17.4% a year over three years, against 22.1% and 15.9% for MLPA. AMLP is also much larger, with $12.1 billion in net assets versus $2.1 billion as of May 31, 2026.
Why does AMLP lag the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index?
Mainly because of taxes and fees. The index makes no deduction for taxes. AMLP pays corporate income tax, and its net asset value is reduced by current and deferred tax accruals. It also charges 1.01% a year. Over the 10 years to December 31, 2025, the fund returned 6.19% a year against 8.15% for the index. Over five years, it returned 22.43% against 25.71%. The prospectus warns that this after-tax gap can be substantial.
Is AMLP good for retirement income?
It pays high income, but it carries heavy risk. Its trailing yield was 7.66% as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly. However, it holds only 13 energy partnerships. It fell 77.1% between August 2014 and March 2020 and didn't recover until November 2023. It lost 32.53% in calendar year 2020. It may suit investors who want energy income as one part of a broader portfolio and can tolerate deep, lasting declines.