Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF

NBETNeuberger BermanEquity
Expense ratio0.65%
Net assets$47.3M
Holdings30
Yield (TTM)2.39%
1 week+2.8%
1 month+5.9%
3 months+6.7%
6 months+7.2%
YTD+32.2%
1 year+35.7%

Total returns with distributions reinvested; * a year. Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 · filings through Jul 31, 2026 · page updated Nov 3, 2026

At a glance

NBET charges 0.65% a year, below the 0.85% average of the 8 funds most like it (the 4th cheapest of 8). It has $47.3M in assets, the 9th largest of that group; it paid 2.39% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), the best of those 9 funds. Its ten largest positions make up 58.9% of the fund, out of 30 in all.

The short version

Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) is an actively managed fund holding about 30 energy infrastructure stocks. Most are US pipeline and midstream companies such as Targa Resources, Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners. Despite the "energy transition" name, oil and gas companies dominate the portfolio. Its 0.65% expense ratio is below the 0.85% average of similar funds but above rivals such as Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR), at 0.35%.

Price history

The interactive chart needs JavaScript.

NBET +35.7% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.

Prices through Oct 27, 2026. Total return: the price with distributions reinvested.

How it has behaved

Volatility (1 year)15.7%annualized; the S&P 500 is usually 15–20%
Worst drop (1 year)-8.0%all history: -17.4%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.12moves less than the market
Sharpe ratio (1 year)2.02return above cash per unit of risk
Since price data starts+22.9%a year over 2 years
52-week range$31.59 – $42.73
Last price $42.33 on Oct 27, 2026, 0.9% below the 52-week high · above its 200-day average ($39.70).
YTD1 yr3 yr5 yr10 yrSince start
NBET official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2024—+5.75%———+9.37%
NBET price data to Oct 27, 2026+32.2%+35.7%———+22.9%
Multi-year figures are annualized total returns with distributions reinvested. "Official" figures are the SEC-standard returns from the fund's prospectus; the price-data row is computed from daily prices. Price data starts 2024-11-01, after the fund's launch on 2022-04-06; figures "since start" cover the available history only.
  • Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, NBET returned +35.7%, 1st of 9 among similar funds.
  • Its worst full calendar year was 2025 (+5.9%); its best was 2025 (+5.9%).
  • The deepest fall in its price history was 17.4% (Jan 21, 2025 to Apr 8, 2025), recovered by Jan 16, 2026.
6%202532%2026*
6%202532%2026*
Calendar-year total returns from price data, distributions reinvested. * 2026 is year to date. From the prospectus: best quarter +12.72% (Sep 30, 2024), worst -10.43% (Sep 30, 2023).
Show as a table
YearPrice dataProspectus (official)
2026 (to date)+32.2%—
2025+5.9%+5.75%
2024—+30.97%
2023—+7.47%
2022—0.00%
2021—0.00%
2020—0.00%
2019—0.00%
2018—0.00%
2017—0.00%
2016—0.00%
2008 financial crisis
stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009
Before this security existed
2020 COVID crash
stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020
Before this security existed
2022 bear market
stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022
Before this security existed

Dividends and income

Yield (last 12 months)2.39%distributions ÷ price
Paid in the last 12 months$1.01per share, split-adjusted
How oftenquarterly 
Latest payment$0.3100Sep 23, 2026
$0.892025$0.882026*
$0.892025$0.882026*
Distributions per share by calendar year, adjusted for a share split. * 2026 to Oct 27, 2026.
Show as a table
YearPer shareChange
2026 (to date)$0.8800
2025$0.8900
Distributions through Oct 27, 2026.

What's inside

As of Jul 31, 2026, the fund held 30 securities; the ten largest made up 58.87% of assets.

HoldingWeight
Targa Resources Corp9.08%
Energy Transfer LP7.80%
Enterprise Products Partners LP7.70%
Cheniere Energy Inc5.94%
DT Midstream Inc5.82%
Williams Cos Inc5.23%
Chevron Corp4.49%
ConocoPhillips4.44%
Western Midstream Partners LP4.43%
Antero Midstream Corp3.93%
Sunococorp LLC3.77%
Antero Resources Corp3.42%
Clearway Energy Inc3.27%
Plains GP Holdings LP3.15%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp3.03%

By country

United States 95.37%Canada 2.92%United Kingdom 1.36%

By asset type

Stocks 99.66%
Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jul 31, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.

What changed recently

  • Over the three months to Jul 31, 2026, investors added a net $4.0M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
  • Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: -5.77%, +0.05%, +3.18%.

How it works

NBET does not track an index. Its portfolio managers pick stocks using their own research. Under normal conditions, the fund keeps at least 80% of its net assets in energy transition and infrastructure companies. In practice, that means "midstream" businesses: companies that gather, process, store and transport oil and natural gas, or export liquefied gas. It can also own utilities, renewable power producers and some oil and gas producers. The fund is required to concentrate in the oil, gas and consumable fuels industry. It is also non-diversified, so it can put more money into fewer companies.

The managers look for companies with a history of rising payouts, steady cash flows, strong finances, low sensitivity to commodity prices and multi-year contracts with inflation-adjusted fees. They sell when a company disappoints, looks overvalued or its outlook changes. Holdings are weighted by the managers' judgment, not by a formula, and the fund has no set rebalancing schedule. Portfolio turnover was 15% in the prospectus, which points to a low-trading style.

Up to 25% of assets can go directly into master limited partnerships (MLPs). These are publicly traded partnerships that are common in the pipeline business. As of July 31, 2026, 58.9% of assets sat in the top 10 holdings, led by Targa Resources (9.1%), Energy Transfer (7.8%) and Enterprise Products Partners (7.7%). The fund held no derivatives, and 95.4% of assets were in US companies.

What it really costs

  • NBET charges 0.65% a year, versus an average of 0.85% for the similar funds below (4th of 8, cheapest first).
  • Of that, 0.64% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
  • The fee includes a 1.45% waiver from the adviser, which may end.
  • Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $66 in the first year and $2,057 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
Cost of $10,000 (SEC example)1 yr3 yrs5 yrs10 yrs
NBET$66$208$699$2,057
SEC standard example: $10,000 invested, 5% annual return, shares sold at the end of each period.

In a retirement portfolio

RoleSatellite (higher risk)

NBET is a concentrated, non-diversified bet on one industry, energy infrastructure, so it fits as a small add-on rather than a foundation.

NBET could add energy infrastructure exposure and some income, but its track record is short. The fund launched in April 2022, after the 2022 bear market had begun, so it has no record through the 2008, 2020 or 2022 downturns. Its deepest drop in the available price history was 17.4%, from January 21 to April 8, 2025. It took about 9.3 months to recover, on January 16, 2026. Its worst quarter in the prospectus was a 10.43% loss in the quarter ending September 30, 2023. Anyone who had to sell during a slump like that would have locked in losses. The trailing yield was 2.39% as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly. Energy payouts can shrink when the sector struggles. The expense ratio is 0.65%. Past results don't predict future ones, and a retirement plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.

Planning to live on your savings? See whether your whole plan holds up, with your real accounts, taxes and Social Security, in ReadyAimRetire.
Run my plan →

Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere

May suit

  • Investors who want a hand-picked portfolio of about 30 US pipeline and midstream companies, such as Targa Resources, Energy Transfer and Williams.
  • People who want partnership holdings like Enterprise Products Partners and Western Midstream inside one ETF, with up to 25% of assets in MLPs.
  • Those adding a small satellite position that pays quarterly, with a trailing yield of 2.39% as of October 27, 2026.

Look elsewhere if

  • Anyone wanting a mainly renewable-energy fund: Chevron, ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil are among its 15 largest holdings, and fossil fuels dominate.
  • Cost-focused investors: ENFR charges 0.35% and MLPX 0.45%, compared with NBET's 0.65%.
  • Investors who prefer larger, longer-tested funds: NBET had $47.3 million in net assets as of July 31, 2026, the smallest among similar funds.

Close alternatives

Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.

FundOverlapCostNet assets1 yr3 yr
NBET this fund—0.65%$47.3M+35.7%—
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF52%0.35%$548.4M+35.1%+27.7%
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructu…47%—$65.4M+35.4%—
USAI Pacer American Energy Independence ETF47%0.75%$132.8M+31.4%+25.8%
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF44%0.45%$3.68B+32.9%+27.2%
TPZ Tortoise Essential Energy Fund43%0.85%$120.6M+3.1%—
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund37%0.4%$894.5M+28.5%+26.2%
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF35%2.18%$471.8M+34.5%+21.9%
Net assets from each fund's latest N-PORT or annual report where available. Returns through Oct 27, 2026.

Questions investors ask

Is NBET a clean energy ETF?

Not really. Despite "energy transition" in its name, NBET is mostly an oil and gas infrastructure fund. As of July 31, 2026, its largest holdings were pipeline and gas companies: Targa Resources, Energy Transfer, Enterprise Products Partners, Cheniere Energy and DT Midstream. It also held oil producers Chevron, ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil. Clearway Energy, a renewable power company, made up about 3.3%. The prospectus requires the fund to concentrate in the oil, gas and consumable fuels industry.

What's the difference between NBET and ENFR?

They overlap a lot but differ in cost and size. About 52% of their holdings overlap, based on the latest N-PORT reports. Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) charges 0.35% a year, compared with NBET's 0.65%. ENFR is also much larger, with $548 million in net assets as of August 31, 2026, against NBET's $47.3 million as of July 31, 2026. Their one-year returns through October 27, 2026 were close: 35.7% for NBET and 35.1% for ENFR.

Does NBET pay monthly dividends?

No. NBET pays distributions quarterly, not monthly. Over the 12 months through October 27, 2026, it paid $1.01 per share, a trailing yield of 2.39%. That income comes from pipeline companies, partnerships and energy producers. Their payouts can rise or fall with the energy business, so past distributions don't guarantee future ones. Funds that want monthly income may want to compare NBET with funds that pay more often.

What is NBET's expense ratio?

NBET's expense ratio is 0.65%, according to its prospectus filed February 24, 2026. That's below the 0.85% average of similar funds but above ENFR (0.35%), TPYP (0.40%) and MLPX (0.45%). In the SEC's standard example, $10,000 earning 5% a year would cost $66 after one year, $208 after three, $699 after five and $2,057 after ten. The sharp jump after year three usually means a temporary fee waiver is expected to end.

How has NBET performed since launch?

NBET has had positive returns in each full calendar year in its prospectus: 7.47% in 2023, 30.97% in 2024 and 5.75% in 2025. Based on price data, it returned 35.7% over the year through October 27, 2026, the top one-year figure among similar funds. It returned 32.2% in 2026 through that date, which is not a full year. Its deepest drop was 17.4%, in early 2025.

Sources

  • 485BPOS prospectus (risk/return XBRL), filed Feb 24, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • N-PORT holdings report, filed Sep 28, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • Prices: daily prices and distributions through Oct 27, 2026

For education only, not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.