At a glance
NBET charges 0.65% a year, below the 0.85% average of the 8 funds most like it (the 4th cheapest of 8). It has $47.3M in assets, the 9th largest of that group; it paid 2.39% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), the best of those 9 funds. Its ten largest positions make up 58.9% of the fund, out of 30 in all.
The short version
Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) is an actively managed fund holding about 30 energy infrastructure stocks. Most are US pipeline and midstream companies such as Targa Resources, Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners. Despite the "energy transition" name, oil and gas companies dominate the portfolio. Its 0.65% expense ratio is below the 0.85% average of similar funds but above rivals such as Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR), at 0.35%.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
NBET +35.7% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBET official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2024 | — | +5.75% | — | — | — | +9.37% |
| NBET price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +32.2% | +35.7% | — | — | — | +22.9% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, NBET returned +35.7%, 1st of 9 among similar funds.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2025 (+5.9%); its best was 2025 (+5.9%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 17.4% (Jan 21, 2025 to Apr 8, 2025), recovered by Jan 16, 2026.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +32.2% | — |
| 2025 | +5.9% | +5.75% |
| 2024 | — | +30.97% |
| 2023 | — | +7.47% |
| 2022 | — | 0.00% |
| 2021 | — | 0.00% |
| 2020 | — | 0.00% |
| 2019 | — | 0.00% |
| 2018 | — | 0.00% |
| 2017 | — | 0.00% |
| 2016 | — | 0.00% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Before this security existed |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Before this security existed |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.8800 | |
| 2025 | $0.8900 |
What's inside
As of Jul 31, 2026, the fund held 30 securities; the ten largest made up 58.87% of assets.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Targa Resources Corp | 9.08% | |
| Energy Transfer LP | 7.80% | |
| Enterprise Products Partners LP | 7.70% | |
| Cheniere Energy Inc | 5.94% | |
| DT Midstream Inc | 5.82% | |
| Williams Cos Inc | 5.23% | |
| Chevron Corp | 4.49% | |
| ConocoPhillips | 4.44% | |
| Western Midstream Partners LP | 4.43% | |
| Antero Midstream Corp | 3.93% | |
| Sunococorp LLC | 3.77% | |
| Antero Resources Corp | 3.42% | |
| Clearway Energy Inc | 3.27% | |
| Plains GP Holdings LP | 3.15% | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp | 3.03% |
By country
United States 95.37%Canada 2.92%United Kingdom 1.36%By asset type
Stocks 99.66%What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jul 31, 2026, investors added a net $4.0M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: -5.77%, +0.05%, +3.18%.
How it works
NBET does not track an index. Its portfolio managers pick stocks using their own research. Under normal conditions, the fund keeps at least 80% of its net assets in energy transition and infrastructure companies. In practice, that means "midstream" businesses: companies that gather, process, store and transport oil and natural gas, or export liquefied gas. It can also own utilities, renewable power producers and some oil and gas producers. The fund is required to concentrate in the oil, gas and consumable fuels industry. It is also non-diversified, so it can put more money into fewer companies.
The managers look for companies with a history of rising payouts, steady cash flows, strong finances, low sensitivity to commodity prices and multi-year contracts with inflation-adjusted fees. They sell when a company disappoints, looks overvalued or its outlook changes. Holdings are weighted by the managers' judgment, not by a formula, and the fund has no set rebalancing schedule. Portfolio turnover was 15% in the prospectus, which points to a low-trading style.
Up to 25% of assets can go directly into master limited partnerships (MLPs). These are publicly traded partnerships that are common in the pipeline business. As of July 31, 2026, 58.9% of assets sat in the top 10 holdings, led by Targa Resources (9.1%), Energy Transfer (7.8%) and Enterprise Products Partners (7.7%). The fund held no derivatives, and 95.4% of assets were in US companies.
What it really costs
- NBET charges 0.65% a year, versus an average of 0.85% for the similar funds below (4th of 8, cheapest first).
- Of that, 0.64% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
- The fee includes a 1.45% waiver from the adviser, which may end.
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $66 in the first year and $2,057 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBET | $66 | $208 | $699 | $2,057 |
In a retirement portfolio
NBET is a concentrated, non-diversified bet on one industry, energy infrastructure, so it fits as a small add-on rather than a foundation.
NBET could add energy infrastructure exposure and some income, but its track record is short. The fund launched in April 2022, after the 2022 bear market had begun, so it has no record through the 2008, 2020 or 2022 downturns. Its deepest drop in the available price history was 17.4%, from January 21 to April 8, 2025. It took about 9.3 months to recover, on January 16, 2026. Its worst quarter in the prospectus was a 10.43% loss in the quarter ending September 30, 2023. Anyone who had to sell during a slump like that would have locked in losses. The trailing yield was 2.39% as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly. Energy payouts can shrink when the sector struggles. The expense ratio is 0.65%. Past results don't predict future ones, and a retirement plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors who want a hand-picked portfolio of about 30 US pipeline and midstream companies, such as Targa Resources, Energy Transfer and Williams.
- People who want partnership holdings like Enterprise Products Partners and Western Midstream inside one ETF, with up to 25% of assets in MLPs.
- Those adding a small satellite position that pays quarterly, with a trailing yield of 2.39% as of October 27, 2026.
Look elsewhere if
- Anyone wanting a mainly renewable-energy fund: Chevron, ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil are among its 15 largest holdings, and fossil fuels dominate.
- Cost-focused investors: ENFR charges 0.35% and MLPX 0.45%, compared with NBET's 0.65%.
- Investors who prefer larger, longer-tested funds: NBET had $47.3 million in net assets as of July 31, 2026, the smallest among similar funds.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBET this fund | — | 0.65% | $47.3M | +35.7% | — |
| ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 52% | 0.35% | $548.4M | +35.1% | +27.7% |
| PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructu… | 47% | — | $65.4M | +35.4% | — |
| USAI Pacer American Energy Independence ETF | 47% | 0.75% | $132.8M | +31.4% | +25.8% |
| MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 44% | 0.45% | $3.68B | +32.9% | +27.2% |
| TPZ Tortoise Essential Energy Fund | 43% | 0.85% | $120.6M | +3.1% | — |
| TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 37% | 0.4% | $894.5M | +28.5% | +26.2% |
| AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 35% | 2.18% | $471.8M | +34.5% | +21.9% |
Questions investors ask
Is NBET a clean energy ETF?
Not really. Despite "energy transition" in its name, NBET is mostly an oil and gas infrastructure fund. As of July 31, 2026, its largest holdings were pipeline and gas companies: Targa Resources, Energy Transfer, Enterprise Products Partners, Cheniere Energy and DT Midstream. It also held oil producers Chevron, ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil. Clearway Energy, a renewable power company, made up about 3.3%. The prospectus requires the fund to concentrate in the oil, gas and consumable fuels industry.
What's the difference between NBET and ENFR?
They overlap a lot but differ in cost and size. About 52% of their holdings overlap, based on the latest N-PORT reports. Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) charges 0.35% a year, compared with NBET's 0.65%. ENFR is also much larger, with $548 million in net assets as of August 31, 2026, against NBET's $47.3 million as of July 31, 2026. Their one-year returns through October 27, 2026 were close: 35.7% for NBET and 35.1% for ENFR.
Does NBET pay monthly dividends?
No. NBET pays distributions quarterly, not monthly. Over the 12 months through October 27, 2026, it paid $1.01 per share, a trailing yield of 2.39%. That income comes from pipeline companies, partnerships and energy producers. Their payouts can rise or fall with the energy business, so past distributions don't guarantee future ones. Funds that want monthly income may want to compare NBET with funds that pay more often.
What is NBET's expense ratio?
NBET's expense ratio is 0.65%, according to its prospectus filed February 24, 2026. That's below the 0.85% average of similar funds but above ENFR (0.35%), TPYP (0.40%) and MLPX (0.45%). In the SEC's standard example, $10,000 earning 5% a year would cost $66 after one year, $208 after three, $699 after five and $2,057 after ten. The sharp jump after year three usually means a temporary fee waiver is expected to end.
How has NBET performed since launch?
NBET has had positive returns in each full calendar year in its prospectus: 7.47% in 2023, 30.97% in 2024 and 5.75% in 2025. Based on price data, it returned 35.7% over the year through October 27, 2026, the top one-year figure among similar funds. It returned 32.2% in 2026 through that date, which is not a full year. Its deepest drop was 17.4%, in early 2025.