At a glance
PBD charges 0.75% a year, above the 0.59% average of the 6 funds most like it (the most expensive of 7). It has $182.7M in assets, the 4th largest of that group; it paid 1.68% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned −5.1% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 3rd of those 7 funds; over three years it returned +7.9% a year. At its worst it fell 34.1% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and is still below its earlier high. Its ten largest positions make up 12.5% of the fund, out of 110 in all.
The short version
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) is an index fund that tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. The index holds clean energy companies in developed and emerging markets, from the US and Taiwan to China and South Korea. The fund spreads its money thinly: as of July 31, 2026, no stock topped 1.5%, and the top 10 made up only 12.5%. Its fee is 0.75% a year, the highest of seven similar clean energy funds.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
PBD -5.1% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBD official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +42.36% | — | -12.37% | +5.47% | — |
| PBD price data to Oct 27, 2026 | -2.8% | -5.1% | +7.9% | -10.4% | — | +2.6% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, PBD returned -5.1%, 3rd of 7 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was -10.4%.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2022 (-29.7%); its best was 2025 (+43.6%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 75.4% (Jan 22, 2021 to Apr 8, 2025), not yet recovered.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | -2.8% | — |
| 2025 | +43.6% | +42.36% |
| 2024 | -26.4% | -26.18% |
| 2023 | -10.7% | -10.70% |
| 2022 | -29.7% | -29.54% |
| 2021 | -22.3% | -21.85% |
| 2020 | — | +144.12% |
| 2019 | — | +39.66% |
| 2018 | — | -19.02% |
| 2017 | — | +27.76% |
| 2016 | — | -6.53% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Not in the price data, which starts Jun 2, 2020 |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Not in the price data, which starts Jun 2, 2020 |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 34.1% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 34.1%, not recovered by the end of the data |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.1700 | |
| 2025 | $0.4400 | +109.5% |
| 2024 | $0.2100 | -53.3% |
| 2023 | $0.4500 | -18.2% |
| 2022 | $0.5500 | +189.5% |
| 2021 | $0.1900 |
What's inside
As of Jul 31, 2026, the fund held 110 securities; the ten largest made up 12.48% of assets. It also reported 23.7% in a money-market fund, most likely cash collateral from lending out shares rather than uninvested money.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Voltronic Power Technology Corp. | 1.49% | |
| Itron, Inc. | 1.39% | |
| Lucid Group, Inc. | 1.34% | |
| NFI Group Inc. | 1.33% | |
| Rivian Automotive, Inc. | 1.19% | |
| Kingspan Group PLC | 1.19% | |
| Blue Bird Corp. | 1.17% | |
| Green Plains Inc. | 1.15% | |
| Terna S.p.A. | 1.12% | |
| Hubbell Inc. | 1.11% | |
| Sino-American Silicon Products Inc. | 1.11% | |
| Chung-Hsin Electric and Machinery Manufacturing Corp. | 1.10% | |
| Darling Ingredients Inc. | 1.10% | |
| Toyo Tanso Co., Ltd. | 1.10% | |
| Littelfuse, Inc. | 1.09% |
By country
United States 23.9%Taiwan 13.73%China 7.22%South Korea 6.34%Cayman Islands 5.98%By asset type
Stocks 99.8%What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jul 31, 2026, investors added a net $11.0M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +6.88%, -11.36%, -11.52%.
How it works
PBD aims to match the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index, before fees. WilderHill New Energy Finance LLC builds and maintains the index. It picks companies whose technologies focus on cleaner energy, conservation, decarbonization and efficiency. That includes wind, solar, biofuels, hydro, geothermal, energy storage, pollution control, hydrogen and fuel cells. As of December 31, 2025, the index held 109 stocks. Their market values ranged from $157.1 million to $79.6 billion.
Invesco uses "full replication." This means the fund buys nearly every stock in the index, in the same proportions as the index. At least 90% of its assets must be in index stocks or depositary receipts (ADRs and GDRs). These are certificates that trade in place of foreign shares. The fund doesn't try to beat the index, so it keeps a lagging stock until the index drops it. Portfolio turnover, the share of holdings replaced in a year, was 49%.
As of July 31, 2026, the fund held 110 stocks. Voltronic Power Technology of Taiwan was the largest at 1.5%, followed by Itron, Lucid Group, NFI Group and Rivian Automotive. US companies made up 23.9% of the fund, Taiwan 13.7% and China 7.2%. Many holdings are small or mid-size companies. Because many stocks trade in foreign currencies, changes in exchange rates also affect returns. The fund does not use leverage, options or derivatives.
What it really costs
- PBD charges 0.75% a year, versus an average of 0.59% for the similar funds below (7th of 7, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $77 in the first year and $930 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBD | $77 | $240 | $417 | $930 |
In a retirement portfolio
PBD is a narrow, volatile theme fund that once lost about 75% of its value, so it fits as a small add-on rather than a foundation.
PBD adds global clean energy stocks, a theme that broad index funds hold little of. The ride has been rough. The fund's price history starts June 2, 2020, so it doesn't cover 2008 or the COVID crash. In the 2022 bear market it fell 34.1%. Its worst calendar year in the prospectus was 2022, at −29.5%. From January 22, 2021 to April 8, 2025 it dropped 75.4%, and it had not recovered as of October 27, 2026. Anyone forced to sell in a slump could lock in deep losses. The yield was 1.68% as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly. The fund costs 0.75% a year, about $77 in the first year on $10,000 in the SEC's standard example. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should weigh the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors who want a small, widely spread slice of global clean energy, with no stock above about 1.5% as of July 31, 2026.
- Investors who can live with steep swings: the fund lost money every calendar year from 2021 through 2024 and fell 75.4% from its peak.
- Investors who want clean energy exposure outside the US, including Taiwan, China and South Korea, and in small and mid-size companies.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-conscious investors: at 0.75%, PBD was the most expensive of seven similar funds. iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) charges 0.41%.
- Retirees who may need to sell in a downturn: the fund had not regained its January 2021 peak as of October 27, 2026.
- Investors who want steady income: the yield was 1.68% as of October 27, 2026, and the price swings sharply.
Close alternatives
Matched by closest holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports (no similar fund shares 20% or more of its holdings).
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBD this fund | — | 0.75% | $182.7M | -5.1% | +7.9% |
| SMOG VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | 22% | 0.61% | $143.7M | -1.1% | +13.4% |
| PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 20% | 0.65% | $420.0M | -20.5% | +3.3% |
| CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF | 20% | 0.5% | $25.2M | -10.0% | +6.1% |
| TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 19% | 0.71% | $1.05B | -14.1% | +1.1% |
| ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 19% | 0.41% | $2.31B | -4.3% | +8.8% |
| ERTH Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF | 16% | 0.67% | $133.5M | -13.4% | +3.5% |
Questions investors ask
Is PBD good for retirement?
PBD is a high-risk theme fund, so it may suit only a small slice of a retirement portfolio. It lost money every calendar year from 2021 through 2024. It fell 75.4% from its January 22, 2021 peak to April 8, 2025, and had not recovered as of October 27, 2026. The yield was 1.68% as of that date, and the fund charges 0.75% a year. Someone drawing on savings would need other assets to sell in a bad year.
What's the difference between PBD and ICLN?
Both hold global clean energy stocks, but only about 19% of their holdings overlap. ICLN is also cheaper and much larger. iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) charges 0.41% a year, compared with 0.75% for PBD. As of July 31, 2026, ICLN had $2.3 billion in net assets and PBD had $182.7 million. As of October 27, 2026, ICLN returned −4.3% over one year and 8.8% a year over three years. PBD returned −5.1% and 7.9%.
Does PBD pay dividends?
Yes. PBD pays dividends quarterly. Over the 12 months to October 27, 2026, it paid about $0.26 per share, a yield of 1.68%. The dividends come from the stocks it holds. Many of them are growth-focused clean energy companies, and some are outside the US, so payouts can vary from quarter to quarter. Income is not the main reason most people hold a theme fund like this one.
How has PBD performed over the long term?
Returns have been very uneven. According to the prospectus, PBD returned an average of 5.47% a year over the 10 years to December 31, 2025. It averaged −12.37% a year over five years and gained 42.36% over one year. It gained 144.12% in 2020, then lost money every year from 2021 through 2024, including −29.54% in 2022. Its best quarter was +58.89% (late 2020) and its worst was −21.15% (mid-2022).
What are PBD's top holdings?
As of July 31, 2026, PBD's largest holdings were Voltronic Power Technology (1.5%), Itron (1.4%), Lucid Group (1.3%), NFI Group (1.3%) and Rivian Automotive (1.2%). The top 10 made up just 12.5% of a 110-stock portfolio, so no single company drives results. By country, US companies were 23.9% of the fund, Taiwan 13.7%, China 7.2% and South Korea 6.3%.