Invesco Solar ETF

TANInvescoEquity
Expense ratio0.7%
Net assets$1.05B
Holdings35
Yield (TTM)0%
1 week+0.6%
1 month-4.6%
3 months-18.5%
6 months-28.4%
YTD-14.5%
1 year-14.1%
3 years*+1.1%
5 years*-14.8%
10 years*+8.8%

Total returns with distributions reinvested; * a year. Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 · filings through Aug 31, 2026 · page updated Nov 3, 2026

At a glance

TAN charges 0.7% a year, above the 0.5% average of the 7 funds most like it (the most expensive of 8). It has $1.05B in assets, the 2nd largest of that group. Over the past year it returned −14.1% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 5th of those 8 funds; over three years it returned +1.1% a year. At its worst it fell 46.9% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 27.5% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 4 months and 3 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 56.6% of the fund, out of 35 in all.

The short version

Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) tracks the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. The index holds about 29 companies around the world that earn at least a third of their revenue from solar power, including equipment makers, installers and solar power producers. The fund is narrower than broad clean-energy funds, and it costs more than any of the seven similar funds it was compared with: 0.70% a year, against a peer average of 0.50%. Its price swings have been extreme.

Price history

The interactive chart needs JavaScript.

TAN -14.1% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.

Prices through Oct 27, 2026. Total return: the price with distributions reinvested.

How it has behaved

Volatility (1 year)37.5%annualized; the S&P 500 is usually 15–20%
Worst drop (1 year)-44.9%3 years: -51.8% · all history: -95.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.92moves more than the market
Sharpe ratio (1 year)-0.48return above cash per unit of risk
Since launch-7.9%a year over 18.5 years
Total over 5 years-55%10 years: +133%
52-week range$40.76 – $73.93
Last price $42.02 on Oct 27, 2026, 43.2% below the 52-week high · below its 200-day average ($53.99).
YTD1 yr3 yr5 yr10 yrSince start
TAN official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2024—-37.09%—+1.83%+0.75%—
TAN price data to Oct 27, 2026-14.5%-14.1%+1.1%-14.8%+8.8%-7.9%
Multi-year figures are annualized total returns with distributions reinvested. "Official" figures are the SEC-standard returns from the fund's prospectus; the price-data row is computed from daily prices.
  • Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, TAN returned -14.1%, 5th of 8 among similar funds.
  • Its 5-year annualized return was -14.8% and its 10-year +8.8%.
  • In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 46.9% and regained its old high 3.7 months after the low.
  • Its worst full calendar year was 2011 (-63.4%); its best was 2020 (+233.9%).
  • The deepest fall in its price history was 95.3% (May 16, 2008 to Nov 20, 2012), not yet recovered.
17%2009-28%2010-63%2011-31%2012128%2013-1%2014-9%2015-43%201654%2017-26%201867%2019234%2020-25%2021-5%2022-27%2023-38%202448%2025-14%2026*
54%2017-26%201867%2019234%2020-25%2021-5%2022-27%2023-38%202448%2025-14%2026*
Calendar-year total returns from price data, distributions reinvested. * 2026 is year to date. From the prospectus: best quarter +78.63% (Sep 30, 2020), worst -32.68% (Sep 30, 2015).
Show as a table
YearPrice dataProspectus (official)
2026 (to date)-14.4%—
2025+48.3%—
2024-37.6%-37.09%
2023-26.8%-26.85%
2022-5.2%-5.18%
2021-25.1%-24.69%
2020+233.9%+233.26%
2019+66.5%+65.65%
2018-25.6%-25.16%
2017+54.4%+54.17%
2016-43.2%-43.21%
2015-8.8%-9.33%
2014-1.3%—
2013+127.9%—
2012-30.8%—
2011-63.4%—
2010-28.5%—
2009+16.9%—
2008 financial crisis
stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009
Before this security existed
2020 COVID crash
stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020
Lost 45.5% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 46.9%, back to its old high 3.7 months after the low
2022 bear market
stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022
Lost 14.8% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 27.5%, back to its old high 2.5 months after the low

Dividends and income

Yield (last 12 months)0%distributions ÷ price
Paid in the last 12 months$0.00per share, split-adjusted
How oftennone in the last year 
Latest payment$0.1600Dec 23, 2024
$0.302010$2.102011$1.422012$0.452013$0.642014$0.492015$0.832016$0.442017$0.132018$0.092019$0.092020$0.052023$0.162024
$0.452013$0.642014$0.492015$0.832016$0.442017$0.132018$0.092019$0.092020$0.052023$0.162024
Distributions per share by calendar year, adjusted for a share split. * 2026 to Oct 27, 2026.
Show as a table
YearPer shareChange
2024$0.1600+220.0%
2023$0.0500-44.4%
2020$0.09000.0%
2019$0.0900-30.8%
2018$0.1300-70.5%
2017$0.4400-47.0%
2016$0.8300+69.4%
2015$0.4900-23.4%
2014$0.6400+42.2%
2013$0.4500-68.3%
2012$1.4200-32.4%
2011$2.1000+600.0%
2010$0.3000
Distributions through Oct 27, 2026.

What's inside

As of Aug 31, 2026, the fund held 35 securities; the ten largest made up 56.58% of assets. It also reported 34.33% in a money-market fund, most likely cash collateral from lending out shares rather than uninvested money.

HoldingWeight
First Solar, Inc.9.85%
Nextpower Inc.8.78%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.7.19%
Enphase Energy, Inc.6.53%
Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd.4.66%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.4.61%
GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd.4.04%
Sunrun Inc.3.78%
Clearway Energy, Inc.3.65%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.3.49%
Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente, S.A.3.31%
O.Y. Nofar Energy Ltd.3.21%
SMA Solar Technology AG3.09%
Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd.2.99%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.2.52%

By country

United States 46.94%Israel 17.37%Cayman Islands 9.92%Spain 5.46%Taiwan 4.84%

By asset type

Stocks 100%
Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Aug 31, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.

What changed recently

  • Over the three months to Aug 31, 2026, investors withdrew a net $472.1M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
  • Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: -20.03%, -16.51%, -3.14%.

How it works

TAN follows the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. The index provider, MAC Indexing, pays S&P Dow Jones Indices to calculate and run it. To qualify, a company must earn at least one-third of its revenue from solar businesses. These include panel and inverter makers, tracking-system and battery suppliers, installers and financers, and companies that sell solar electricity. Stocks must also be listed in one of 26 named countries, trade often enough to meet liquidity rules, and pass environmental, social and governance (ESG) screens. As of October 31, 2025, the index had about 29 members, with market values from about $214.1 million to $28.6 billion.

The fund uses "full replication": it owns every stock in the index in the same proportions, and puts at least 90% of its assets in those stocks. It is "non-diversified," which means it can hold large stakes in a few companies. As of May 31, 2026, its 10 largest holdings made up 65% of the fund. They were led by First Solar (11.7%), Nextpower (9.8%) and Enphase Energy (8.8%). US companies made up 53% and Israeli companies about 20%.

Because the fund is passive, it keeps a struggling stock until the index drops it. The May 31, 2026 report showed no derivatives. The 22% cash position appears to be mostly collateral from securities lending, where the fund lends its shares to other investors for a fee. Portfolio turnover was 41%.

What it really costs

  • TAN charges 0.7% a year, versus an average of 0.5% for the similar funds below (8th of 8, cheapest first).
  • Of that, 0.5% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
  • Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $72 in the first year and $871 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
Cost of $10,000 (SEC example)1 yr3 yrs5 yrs10 yrs
TAN$72$224$390$871
SEC standard example: $10,000 invested, 5% annual return, shares sold at the end of each period.

In a retirement portfolio

RoleSatellite (higher risk)

TAN is a concentrated bet on one industry, with very large price swings and no income, so it fits at most as a small add-on around a broader core.

TAN could add focused exposure to solar companies, but its history shows how hard it can be to hold. Its deepest drop was 95.3%, from May 16, 2008 to November 20, 2012, and its price had still not returned to that peak as of October 27, 2026. It lost 63.4% in 2011 and 37.09% in 2024. In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 46.9% in about a month, then recovered by July 2020. In 2022 it fell 27.5% and recovered by late July. Anyone forced to sell during one of these slumps would have locked in heavy losses. It paid no income in the 12 months to October 27, 2026. Its 0.70% expense ratio ($72 in the first year on $10,000, under the SEC's standard example) is the highest of eight similar funds. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.

Planning to live on your savings? See whether your whole plan holds up, with your real accounts, taxes and Social Security, in ReadyAimRetire.
Run my plan →

Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere

May suit

  • Investors who want a concentrated bet on about 29 solar companies, led by First Solar, Nextpower and Enphase, as a small part of a larger portfolio.
  • People who can stomach extreme swings, such as a 233% gain in 2020 followed by four straight losing years from 2021 through 2024.
  • Investors who don't need income from this holding, since it paid no distributions in the 12 months to October 27, 2026.

Look elsewhere if

  • Retirees who may need to sell in a downturn. Its deepest drop was 95.3%, and that peak hadn't been regained as of October 27, 2026.
  • Cost-conscious investors. At 0.70%, its expense ratio is the highest of eight similar funds, and iShares Global Clean Energy (ICLN) charges 0.41%.
  • Anyone who wants broad diversification. TAN is non-diversified, with 65% in its top 10 holdings and about 20% in Israeli companies as of May 31, 2026.

Close alternatives

Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.

FundOverlapCostNet assets1 yr3 yr
TAN this fund—0.7%$1.05B-14.1%+1.1%
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF34%0.41%$2.31B-4.3%+8.8%
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF32%0.4%$153.8M-3.2%+14.9%
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF29%0.58%$4.8M-15.8%+14.4%
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF28%0.55%$109.2M-25.3%-2.8%
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF27%0.45%$249.7M-18.9%+11.7%
VCLN Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF27%0.59%$5.5M+1.8%+19.9%
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF26%0.5%$25.2M-10.0%+6.1%
Net assets from each fund's latest N-PORT or annual report where available. Returns through Oct 27, 2026.

Questions investors ask

Is TAN a good long-term investment?

TAN's long-term record has been weak and very bumpy. The prospectus reports average annual returns of 1.83% over five years and 0.75% over ten years through December 31, 2024. Based on price, its five-year return was -14.8% a year as of October 27, 2026. Its deepest drop was 95.3%, starting in 2008. Big gains, like 233% in 2020 and 48% in 2025, have come between long losing stretches. Past results don't predict the future.

Does TAN pay dividends?

No. TAN made no distributions in the 12 months to October 27, 2026, so its trailing yield was 0%. Many of its holdings are growth-focused solar companies that tend to reinvest their earnings instead of paying them out. That means TAN can't provide a steady income stream. Anyone drawing cash from a portfolio would have to sell shares, which can mean selling at a loss after one of the fund's frequent steep declines.

What's the difference between TAN and ICLN?

TAN focuses only on solar, while the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) covers clean energy more broadly. The two share about 33% of their holdings. ICLN costs less: 0.41% a year versus TAN's 0.70%. As of October 27, 2026, ICLN also did better over the past year (-4.3% versus -14.1%) and over three years (8.8% a year versus 1.1%). The two funds hold similar amounts of money, about $2.3 billion each.

What are TAN's top holdings?

As of May 31, 2026, TAN's largest holdings were First Solar (11.7%), Nextpower (9.8%), Enphase Energy (8.8%), Enlight Renewable Energy (7.6%) and SolarEdge Technologies (6.3%). The top 10 made up about 65% of the fund. US companies made up about 53% of the fund and Israeli companies about 20%. Spain, Taiwan and Germany made up most of the rest. With so few stocks, one company's bad news can move the whole fund.

What is TAN's expense ratio?

TAN's expense ratio is 0.70% a year, according to its prospectus filed December 18, 2025. That includes a 0.50% management fee. Under the SEC's standard example, which assumes $10,000 invested and a 5% annual return, costs would come to about $72 after one year, $390 after five years and $871 after ten years. The fund is the most expensive of eight similar clean-energy funds, which average 0.50%.

Sources

  • 485BPOS prospectus (risk/return XBRL), filed Dec 18, 2025 — SEC EDGAR
  • N-PORT holdings report, filed Oct 30, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • Prices: daily prices and distributions through Oct 27, 2026

For education only, not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.