At a glance
LOWV charges 0.39% a year, above the 0.13% average of the 8 funds most like it (the most expensive of 9). It has $204.1M in assets, the 9th largest of that group; it paid 0.83% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned +8.0% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 8th of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +18.5% a year. Its ten largest positions make up 41.6% of the fund, out of 68 in all.
The short version
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) is an actively managed AllianceBernstein fund that picks mostly large and mid-sized US stocks it judges to be profitable, steadily priced and reasonably valued. Its goal is stock-market growth with smaller swings. As of October 27, 2026, its one-year beta, a measure of how closely it moves with the market, was 0.69. Its 0.39% expense ratio is well above the 0.13% average for funds with similar holdings.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
LOWV +8.0% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOWV official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +12.23% | — | — | — | +18.65% |
| S&P 500Index index, same period | — | +17.88% | — | — | — | +22.97% |
| LOWV price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +9.6% | +8.0% | +18.5% | — | — | +17.5% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, LOWV returned +8.0%, 8th of 9 among similar funds.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2025 (+12.3%); its best was 2024 (+20.4%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 13.9% (Feb 19, 2025 to Apr 8, 2025), recovered by Jun 4, 2025.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +9.6% | — |
| 2025 | +12.3% | +12.23% |
| 2024 | +20.4% | +20.41% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Before this security existed |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Before this security existed |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.5200 | |
| 2025 | $0.6600 | +1.5% |
| 2024 | $0.6500 |
What's inside
As of Aug 31, 2026, the fund held 68 securities; the ten largest made up 41.62% of assets.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 6.50% | |
| NVIDIA Corp | 6.40% | |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.89% | |
| Alphabet Inc | 5.77% | |
| Broadcom Inc | 4.23% | |
| Amazon.com Inc | 3.63% | |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 2.40% | |
| Visa Inc | 2.36% | |
| Merck & Co Inc | 2.35% | |
| Mastercard Inc | 2.10% | |
| Bank of America Corp | 2.07% | |
| Gilead Sciences Inc | 1.99% | |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 1.93% | |
| McKesson Corp | 1.91% | |
| AbbVie Inc | 1.75% |
By country
United States 85.52%United Kingdom 4.8%Ireland 3.73%Taiwan 1.93%Netherlands 1.26%By asset type
Stocks 99.5%By sector
Sectors of the companies held, for the 79.2% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Aug 31, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.What changed recently
- Over the three months to Aug 31, 2026, investors withdrew a net $6.5M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: -1.59%, +3.57%, +1.46%.
How it works
LOWV does not track an index. AllianceBernstein's managers choose the holdings. At least 80% of net assets must be in stocks of US companies. A US company is one that is based in the US, trades mainly in the US, or does much of its business there. The fund may also own some foreign stocks. As of August 31, 2026, about 85.5% of assets were in US companies, with smaller amounts in the UK (4.8%), Ireland (3.7%) and Taiwan (1.9%).
The managers combine fundamental research (studying each company) with quantitative research (data-driven models). They look at a company's profit record and outlook, the quality of its management, its competitive edge, its valuation, how much its stock price swings, and how easily its shares trade. They then compare each company with the wider market. The fund focuses on companies worth $2 billion or more. The prospectus gives no fixed weighting formula or rebalancing schedule. Portfolio turnover, the share of holdings replaced in a year, was 34%.
The fund is non-diversified, meaning it can put more money into fewer companies. As of August 31, 2026, it held 68 stocks, and the top 10 made up 41.6% of assets. The largest were Apple (6.5%), NVIDIA (6.4%), Microsoft (5.9%) and Alphabet (5.8%), and technology was the biggest sector at about 31%. The fund held no derivatives. It aims for smaller swings than other US stock funds, but there is no guarantee it will achieve that.
What it really costs
- LOWV charges 0.39% a year, versus an average of 0.13% for the similar funds below (9th of 9, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $40 in the first year and $493 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOWV | $40 | $125 | $219 | $493 |
In a retirement portfolio
It is a full stock fund, but both its stated goal and its short record point to smaller swings than the broad US market.
LOWV could give a portfolio stock-market growth with somewhat gentler swings. As of October 27, 2026, its one-year volatility (how much its returns bounce around) was 10.2%, and its beta was 0.69. The fund launched in March 2023, so it has no record in the 2008, 2020 or 2022 downturns. Its deepest drop was 13.9%, from February 19 to April 8, 2025. It regained its peak by June 4, 2025, about two months later. Anyone forced to take money out in early April 2025 would have done so near that low. Its weakest calendar year, 2025, still returned 12.23%, though the S&P 500 returned 17.88%.
Income is small: the trailing yield was 0.83% as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly. The SEC's standard example puts costs at $493 over 10 years on $10,000. The fund's history is short, and past results don't predict the future. A retirement plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors who want US stocks with smaller swings; as of October 27, 2026, its one-year beta was 0.69 and its deepest drop was 13.9%.
- People who prefer managers screening for profitability, valuation and price stability over owning every stock in an index like the S&P 500.
- Holders who are comfortable with concentration: its top 10 holdings, led by Apple, NVIDIA and Microsoft, made up 41.6% of assets on August 31, 2026.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-focused investors: its 0.39% expense ratio was the highest of nine comparable funds, against 0.03% for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).
- Anyone seeking meaningful income, since the trailing yield was just 0.83% as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly.
- Investors wanting a long record or full market gains: it launched in 2023 and trailed the S&P 500 over one year and since inception.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOWV this fund | — | 0.39% | $204.1M | +8.0% | +18.5% |
| MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 46% | 0.07% | $10.90B | +13.5% | +26.0% |
| IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 44% | 0.15% | $2.19B | +12.5% | +25.5% |
| FYEE Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF | 43% | 0.28% | $218.3M | +15.1% | — |
| TSPA T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF | 43% | 0.34% | $4.06B | +12.9% | +24.8% |
| SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 41% | 0.04% | $63.03B | +2.2% | +23.0% |
| SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | 41% | 0.0945% | $781.19B | +11.5% | +21.9% |
| SPYM SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 41% | 0.02% | $153.92B | +11.5% | +22.0% |
Questions investors ask
Is LOWV good for retirement?
It may suit retirees who want stock exposure with smaller swings, but it has a short record. Since its March 2023 launch, its deepest drop was 13.9%, in early 2025, and it recovered in about two months. Its one-year beta was 0.69 as of October 27, 2026. The trade-offs are a low 0.83% yield, a 0.39% expense ratio, and returns that trailed the S&P 500. It has not yet been through a long bear market.
What's the difference between LOWV and SPY?
SPY tracks the S&P 500 index for 0.0945% a year. LOWV is actively managed, aims for lower volatility, and charges 0.39%. About 41% of their holdings overlap. Over one year, LOWV returned 8% through October 27, 2026, while SPY returned 12.4% through October 30, 2026. Over three years, LOWV returned 18.5% a year and SPY returned 23.5% a year. LOWV's appeal is smaller swings, not higher returns.
Does LOWV pay dividends?
Yes. LOWV pays dividends quarterly, but they are modest. Over the 12 months to October 27, 2026, it paid about $0.71 per share, a trailing yield of 0.83%. That is low because the fund is built for growth with smaller swings, not income. Its largest holdings, such as Apple, NVIDIA and Microsoft, are not high-dividend stocks. Investors who need regular cash flow may want to compare it with funds focused on dividends.
What is LOWV's expense ratio?
LOWV's expense ratio is 0.39%, according to its prospectus filed March 27, 2026. All of that is the management fee, and there is no fee waiver. In the SEC's standard example of $10,000 earning 5% a year, costs come to about $40 after one year, $219 after five years and $493 after 10 years. The average for funds with similar holdings is 0.13%, and LOWV ranked ninth of nine on cost.
Why does a low volatility ETF own so many tech stocks?
LOWV's managers weigh several factors, including profitability, valuation, competitive edge and liquidity, so price stability is only one of them. As of August 31, 2026, technology was the largest sector at about 31% of assets. The biggest holdings were Apple, NVIDIA and Microsoft. Because the fund is non-diversified and leans on one sector, a slump in big tech stocks could hit it harder than its low-volatility label suggests.