At a glance
FMED charges 0.5% a year, below the 0.65% average of the 7 funds most like it (the 3rd cheapest of 8). It has $51.5M in assets, the 4th largest of that group. Over the past year it returned +21.5% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 6th of those 8 funds; over three years it returned +17.8% a year. Its ten largest positions make up 33.3% of the fund, out of 72 in all.
The short version
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) is an actively managed fund. Fidelity picks about 72 health care companies it believes are changing medicine, in areas from genomics and gene therapy to robotic surgery. Its 0.50% expense ratio is below the 0.65% average for similar funds, though XBI (0.35%) and IBB (0.45%) cost less. It is a small fund, with about $51.5 million in assets as of August 31, 2026.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
FMED +21.5% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMED official prospectus, to Sep 29, 2026 | — | +9.69% | — | -0.21% | — | +3.37% |
| IXXIM index, same period | — | +11.74% | — | -2.23% | — | +3.77% |
| MS159 index, same period | — | +22.71% | — | +11.56% | — | +19.90% |
| FMED price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +20.2% | +21.5% | +17.8% | — | — | +7.9% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, FMED returned +21.5%, 6th of 8 among similar funds.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2024 (+2.3%); its best was 2025 (+9.7%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 21.8% (Jul 21, 2023 to Oct 30, 2023), recovered by Feb 27, 2024.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +20.2% | — |
| 2025 | +9.7% | +9.69% |
| 2024 | +2.3% | +2.45% |
| 2023 | — | +1.36% |
| 2022 | — | -21.71% |
| 2021 | — | +10.99% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Before this security existed |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Before this security existed |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $0.1110 |
What's inside
As of Aug 31, 2026, the fund held 72 securities; the ten largest made up 33.25% of assets. It also reported 4.69% in a money-market fund, most likely cash collateral from lending out shares rather than uninvested money.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| 10X GENOMICS INC | 5.19% | |
| THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC | 3.83% | |
| DANAHER CORP | 3.73% | |
| NATERA INC | 3.30% | |
| ARGENX SE | 3.20% | |
| LIFESTANCE HEALTH GROUP INC | 3.00% | |
| REVOLUTION MEDICINES INC | 2.87% | |
| ILLUMINA INC | 2.82% | |
| MODERNA INC | 2.72% | |
| HEARTFLOW INC | 2.59% | |
| SARTORIUS STEDIM BIOTECH | 2.56% | |
| ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS INC | 2.33% | |
| COGENT BIOSCIENCES INC | 2.31% | |
| INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC | 2.05% | |
| ASCENDIS PHARMA A/S | 1.97% |
By country
United States 81.12%Netherlands 4.42%Cayman Islands 2.62%France 2.56%Bermuda 2.19%By asset type
Stocks 99.77%What changed recently
- Over the three months to Aug 31, 2026, investors added a net $0.00 (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +13.25%, -2.03%, +13.37%.
How it works
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF does not track an index. It is actively managed: Fidelity's team picks the stocks. Normally, at least 80% of assets go to what Fidelity calls "disruptive medicine" companies, meaning businesses with new ways of developing, making or delivering medical products and services that could displace established rivals. Examples include robotic surgery, cell and gene therapy, genomics, immunotherapy, precision medicine and advanced diagnostics. The fund may own companies in any sector but concentrates in health care.
A company qualifies if it meets at least one of Fidelity's tests, such as being early to market with a high-impact product, holding patents on innovative products, or having a business model that challenges older competitors. Managers study each company's finances and industry position (fundamental analysis) and use computer models to help build the portfolio.
The prospectus describes no fixed rebalancing schedule; managers trade as their views change. Turnover was 49%, meaning the fund traded roughly half its portfolio's value in a year. As of August 31, 2026, the fund had 72 holdings, about 81% in US companies and 33% in the top 10. The largest were 10x Genomics (5.2%), Thermo Fisher Scientific (3.8%) and Danaher (3.7%). It may use derivatives (contracts tied to other assets' prices) but held none then.
What it really costs
- FMED charges 0.5% a year, versus an average of 0.65% for the similar funds below (3rd of 8, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $51 in the first year and $628 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMED | $51 | $160 | $280 | $628 |
In a retirement portfolio
FMED is a concentrated, actively picked bet on medical innovation stocks with no income, so it fits as a small add-on rather than a foundation.
FMED could add targeted exposure to medical innovation next to a broad core of stocks and bonds. But the ETF's own track record is short. It launched on June 12, 2023, so it missed the 2008, 2020 and 2022 market declines. Its deepest drop was 21.8%, from July 21 to October 30, 2023. It took about 3.9 months to recover, getting back by February 27, 2024. Fidelity's prospectus also shows a 21.71% loss for 2022, a year before the ETF's launch date. Anyone who had to sell in a slump like that would lock in the loss. FMED paid no distributions in the year through October 27, 2026, so it provides no income. It costs 0.50% a year. In the SEC's standard example, that comes to $51 in the first year on a $10,000 investment. Past results don't predict future ones, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors who want a manager-picked mix of genomics, diagnostics, gene therapy and surgical robotics stocks such as 10x Genomics, Natera and Intuitive Surgical.
- Investors who want active management for less than MEDI (0.80%) or BMED (0.85%) charge: FMED's expense ratio is 0.50%.
- Growth-focused holders who can sit through drops like the 21.8% fall in 2023 and don't need income from this fund.
Look elsewhere if
- Retirees who need income: FMED paid no distributions in the year through October 27, 2026.
- Cost- or return-focused investors: XBI charges 0.35% and returned 34.4% a year over three years to October 27, 2026, against FMED's 17.8%.
- Investors wary of small funds: FMED had about $51.5 million in assets, and the prospectus warns an active trading market isn't guaranteed.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMED this fund | — | 0.5% | $51.5M | +21.5% | +17.8% |
| IBB iShares Biotechnology ETF | 30% | 0.45% | $9.09B | +35.3% | +23.9% |
| MEDI Harbor Health Care ETF | 30% | 0.8% | $41.2M | +12.6% | +18.2% |
| GDOC Future Health Care Equity ETF | 26% | 0.75% | $19.6M | +9.7% | +11.2% |
| BMED iShares Health Innovation Active ETF | 25% | 0.85% | $11.2M | +24.8% | +20.2% |
| EKG First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solut… | 21% | 0.65% | $2.8M | +31.1% | +25.8% |
| XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 21% | 0.35% | $10.73B | +39.3% | +34.4% |
| HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innov… | 21% | 0.68% | $69.1M | +36.8% | +27.4% |
Questions investors ask
Does FMED pay a dividend?
No. FMED paid no distributions in the year through October 27, 2026, and its trailing yield was 0%. Any return comes from changes in the share price. The fund aims for long-term growth of capital and buys health care innovation companies, many of which put their cash back into research instead of paying dividends. Investors who need regular income from their portfolio would have to sell shares to raise cash from this fund.
What is FMED's expense ratio?
FMED's expense ratio is 0.50% a year, according to the prospectus filed September 24, 2026. All of it is the management fee, and there is no fee waiver. That is below the 0.65% average for similar funds and ranks 3rd lowest of 8. In the SEC's standard example ($10,000 invested, 5% yearly return), total costs would be $51 after one year, $160 after three, $280 after five and $628 after ten.
FMED vs IBB: what's the difference?
IBB, the iShares Biotechnology ETF, shares about 30% of its holdings with FMED. It costs a bit less at 0.45%, compared with FMED's 0.50%. It is also far larger, at about $9.1 billion as of June 30, 2026. IBB has done better: as of October 27, 2026, it returned 35.3% over one year and 23.9% a year over three years, against FMED's 21.5% and 17.8%. FMED is picked by Fidelity's managers and spans genomics, devices, diagnostics and foreign companies.
Is FMED actively managed?
Yes. FMED does not track an index. Fidelity's managers choose stocks they consider disruptive in medicine. They combine fundamental research with quantitative tools that help size each position. Portfolio turnover was 49%. The prospectus warns that management choices may not work and the fund could lag similar funds. As of September 29, 2026, its one-year return was 9.69%, behind the two comparison indexes in its prospectus, which returned 11.74% and 22.71%.
What are FMED's top holdings?
As of August 31, 2026, FMED's largest holdings were 10x Genomics (5.2%), Thermo Fisher Scientific (3.8%), Danaher (3.7%), Natera (3.3%) and argenx (3.2%). Other holdings included Illumina, Moderna and Intuitive Surgical. The fund held 72 issuers, and the top 10 made up 33.25% of assets. About 81% was in US companies. Most of the rest was in companies based in the Netherlands, France, Denmark, the Cayman Islands and Bermuda.