At a glance
BMED charges 0.55% a year, above the 0.36% average of the 8 funds most like it (the 7th cheapest of 9). It has $11.2M in assets, the 8th largest of that group; it paid 0.22% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, annual. Over the past year it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 4th of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +20.2% a year. At its worst it fell 28.6% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 38 months after the low. Its ten largest positions make up 41.7% of the fund, out of 56 in all.
The short version
iShares Health Innovation Active ETF (BMED) is an actively managed BlackRock fund that hand-picks health sciences stocks, aiming for innovative and emerging companies. It charges 0.55% a year (its expense ratio), above the 0.36% average of similar funds, and had just $11.2 million in net assets as of July 31, 2026. Its three-year return topped those funds as of October 27, 2026, but its five-year return was about 4% a year.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
BMED +24.8% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMED official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2024 | — | +1.81% | — | — | — | -0.15% |
| BMED price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +17.9% | +24.8% | +20.2% | +4.0% | — | +5.8% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, BMED returned +24.8%, 4th of 9 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was +4.0%.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2022 (-19.7%); its best was 2025 (+21.8%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 36.4% (Feb 9, 2021 to Sep 26, 2022), recovered by Aug 10, 2026.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +17.9% | — |
| 2025 | +21.8% | — |
| 2024 | +1.6% | +1.81% |
| 2023 | +5.7% | +5.67% |
| 2022 | -19.7% | -19.52% |
| 2021 | -3.8% | -3.96% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Before this security existed |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 27.6% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 28.6%, back to its old high 37.5 months after the low |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.0800 | |
| 2023 | $0.0100 | -76.4% |
| 2021 | $0.0424 |
What's inside
As of Jul 31, 2026, the fund held 56 securities; the ten largest made up 41.72% of assets, and 5.48% sat in cash and money-market holdings.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Merck & Co Inc | 5.91% | |
| Gilead Sciences Inc | 4.86% | |
| Johnson & Johnson | 4.49% | |
| Edwards Lifesciences Corp | 4.42% | |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 4.18% | |
| Charles River Laboratories International Inc | 3.72% | |
| Danaher Corp | 3.63% | |
| Biogen Inc | 3.52% | |
| Waters Corp | 3.50% | |
| Mettler-Toledo International Inc | 3.48% | |
| AbbVie Inc | 3.44% | |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 2.95% | |
| Moderna Inc | 2.92% | |
| Dexcom Inc | 2.61% | |
| Amgen Inc | 2.49% |
By country
United States 83.38%Switzerland 4.33%Netherlands 1.91%Bermuda 1.42%United Kingdom 1.33%By asset type
Stocks 95.63%Other 0.01%By sector
Sectors of the companies held, for the 44.5% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jul 31, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jul 31, 2026, investors added a net $0.00 (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +2.47%, +6.93%, +1.11%.
How it works
BMED is actively managed, so it does not track an index. BlackRock's managers pick the stocks, aiming to maximize total return (price gains plus dividends). Normally at least 80% of net assets go into health sciences companies: drugmakers, biotech firms, medical equipment and diagnostics makers, clinical labs, hospital operators and their suppliers. It may also own companies working on animal and plant health, such as crop yields or pet health.
The managers look for innovative and emerging companies of any size worldwide, including emerging markets (developing economies), with a stated focus on mid- and small-sized firms. The prospectus sets no weighting formula or rebalancing schedule; position sizes are the managers' call. As of July 31, 2026, the fund had 56 holdings; the largest were Merck (5.9%), Gilead Sciences (4.9%) and Johnson & Johnson (4.5%), and the 10 largest made up 41.7% of assets. Turnover was 109%, meaning it traded roughly the value of its whole portfolio in a year, which adds trading costs.
Up to 20% can go elsewhere, including stocks outside health care and lower-rated "junk" bonds. It may also use derivatives (contracts tied to other assets' prices), such as futures, swaps and options, to manage risk or add income. It is not a leveraged fund, and its July 31, 2026 holdings report showed no derivatives.
What it really costs
- BMED charges 0.55% a year, versus an average of 0.36% for the similar funds below (7th of 9, cheapest first).
- Of that, 0.77% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
- The fee includes a 0.22% waiver from the adviser, which may end.
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $56 in the first year and $934 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMED | $56 | $224 | $406 | $934 |
In a retirement portfolio
It is a concentrated, actively managed health sciences fund whose deepest drop was 36.4%, so it fits better as a small side position than as a foundation.
BMED could add a hand-picked slice of health care stocks, but it has swung hard. Launched in September 2020, it has no record from the 2008 and early-2020 crashes. In the 2022 market slump it fell 28.6% and took 37.5 months to recover. Its deepest drop, 36.4% from February 2021 to September 2022, took 46.5 months to recover. Its worst calendar year was 2022, down 19.5% per the prospectus. Withdrawing money then would have meant cashing out at a loss.
Income is minimal: the 12-month yield was 0.22% as of October 27, 2026, paid once a year. The 0.55% expense ratio is above the 0.36% peer average; in the SEC's standard example, $10,000 earning 5% a year would cost $56 after one year and $934 after 10 years. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors who want active stock picking in health sciences, with a stated tilt toward innovative mid- and small-sized companies over a fixed index.
- People wanting a small side holding who can tolerate drops like its 36.4% peak-to-trough fall, which took 46.5 months to recover.
- Long-term holders who don't need cash flow from it: the yield was 0.22% as of October 27, 2026, paid once a year.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-focused investors: the 0.55% expense ratio compares with 0.08% for XLV and 0.09% for VHT, which overlap 34% to 35% with BMED's holdings.
- Investors wary of small funds: BMED had about $11.2 million in net assets as of July 31, 2026, 8th of 9 among similar funds.
- Those seeking a broad, steady core holding: it concentrates in one sector and lost 19.5% in 2022, according to its prospectus.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMED this fund | — | 0.55% | $11.2M | +24.8% | +20.2% |
| IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 36% | 0.39% | $3.56B | +23.8% | +15.0% |
| VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 35% | 0.09% | $22.04B | +28.9% | +16.9% |
| JDOC JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF | 35% | 0.65% | $9.1M | +15.7% | — |
| IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF | 35% | 0.41% | $3.84B | +19.5% | +13.4% |
| RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF | 35% | 0.4% | $766.9M | +28.4% | +16.6% |
| FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 34% | 0.084% | $3.29B | +23.8% | +16.0% |
| GDOC Future Health Care Equity ETF | 34% | 0.75% | $19.6M | +9.7% | +11.2% |
Questions investors ask
Is BMED good for retirement?
It may fit only as a small, higher-risk side holding rather than a core one. BMED is an actively managed fund concentrated in health sciences, with a stated tilt toward mid- and small-sized companies. It fell 28.6% in the 2022 market slump and took 37.5 months to recover. It also provides little income: its yield over the prior 12 months was 0.22% as of October 27, 2026, paid once a year.
What is BMED's expense ratio?
BMED's expense ratio was 0.55% a year, according to its prospectus filed November 21, 2025. That is a 0.77% management fee minus a 0.22% fee waiver, and waivers are not always permanent. The cost ranked 7th of 9 among similar funds, whose average was 0.36%. In the SEC's standard example, $10,000 earning 5% a year would cost about $56 after one year, $406 after five years and $934 after 10 years.
BMED vs IYH: what's the difference?
The main differences are cost, size and recent returns. The iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) is the closest match among similar funds, overlapping about 36% with BMED's holdings. IYH's expense ratio is 0.39% versus BMED's 0.55%, and IYH held $3.56 billion versus BMED's $11.2 million as of July 31, 2026. As of October 27, 2026, BMED returned about 20.2% a year over three years versus 15% for IYH, and 24.8% over one year versus 23.8%.
Does BMED pay dividends?
Yes, but very little, and only once a year. BMED's yield over the prior 12 months was 0.22% as of October 27, 2026, or about $0.08 per share. That makes it a growth-oriented holding rather than an income source. Investors who need regular cash from their portfolio may find the payout too small and too infrequent to rely on.
How has BMED performed since it launched?
Unevenly, with weak early years and stronger gains from 2025. According to its prospectus, BMED lost 3.96% in 2021 and 19.52% in 2022, then gained 5.67% in 2023 and 1.81% in 2024. Its average annual return from its September 2020 launch through December 31, 2024 was -0.15%. Based on market prices, it gained 21.8% in 2025 and 17.9% in 2026 through October 27, and returned about 4% a year over the five years to that date.