At a glance
EQWL charges 0.25% a year, above the 0.1% average of the 8 funds most like it (the most expensive of 9). It has $2.70B in assets, the 6th largest of that group; it paid 1.56% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 5th of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +23.2% a year. At its worst it fell 34.2% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 23.0% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 5 months and 14 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 11.4% of the fund, out of 101 in all.
The short version
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) tracks the S&P 100 Equal Weight Index. It holds the same roughly 100 blue-chip US companies as the S&P 100, but gives each about the same weight instead of weighting them by size. As of July 31, 2026, no stock was much above 1% of assets, so Microsoft counted about as much as RTX or Abbott. The trade-off is cost: 0.25% a year, against a 0.10% average for similar funds.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
EQWL +14.3% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQWL official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +17.67% | — | +13.70% | +14.02% | — |
| EQWL price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +13.6% | +14.3% | +23.2% | +11.9% | +14.7% | +10.8% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, EQWL returned +14.3%, 5th of 9 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was +11.9% and its 10-year +14.7%.
- In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 34.2% and regained its old high 5.4 months after the low.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2008 (-33.3%); its best was 2013 (+37.3%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 49.3% (Oct 12, 2007 to Mar 9, 2009), recovered by Mar 15, 2012.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +13.6% | — |
| 2025 | +17.6% | +17.67% |
| 2024 | +19.1% | +18.94% |
| 2023 | +19.5% | +19.46% |
| 2022 | -11.5% | -11.39% |
| 2021 | +28.3% | +28.25% |
| 2020 | +14.0% | +13.75% |
| 2019 | +29.6% | +29.49% |
| 2018 | -6.3% | -5.68% |
| 2017 | +24.4% | +23.67% |
| 2016 | +13.3% | +13.79% |
| 2015 | -2.3% | — |
| 2014 | +15.1% | — |
| 2013 | +37.3% | — |
| 2012 | +11.7% | — |
| 2011 | +3.0% | — |
| 2010 | +13.8% | — |
| 2009 | +20.2% | — |
| 2008 | -33.3% | — |
| 2007 | +9.3% | — |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Lost 49% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 49.3%, back to its old high 36.2 months after the low |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Lost 34.2% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 34.2%, back to its old high 5.4 months after the low |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 22.1% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 23%, back to its old high 14.4 months after the low |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $1.5500 | |
| 2025 | $1.9700 | +3.1% |
| 2024 | $1.9100 | +10.4% |
| 2023 | $1.7300 | +8.8% |
| 2022 | $1.5900 | +12.0% |
| 2021 | $1.4200 | +2.9% |
| 2020 | $1.3800 | +8.7% |
| 2019 | $1.2700 | +16.5% |
| 2018 | $1.0900 | +62.7% |
| 2017 | $0.6700 | -22.1% |
| 2016 | $0.8600 | +8.9% |
| 2015 | $0.7900 | +11.3% |
| 2014 | $0.7100 | +22.4% |
| 2013 | $0.5800 | -13.4% |
| 2012 | $0.6700 | +26.4% |
| 2011 | $0.5300 | +43.2% |
| 2010 | $0.3700 | +19.4% |
| 2009 | $0.3100 | +10.7% |
| 2008 | $0.2800 | +3.7% |
| 2007 | $0.2700 |
What's inside
As of Jul 31, 2026, the fund held 101 securities; the ten largest made up 11.45% of assets.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX Corp. | 1.18% | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | 1.16% | |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 1.16% | |
| Abbott Laboratories | 1.15% | |
| Charles Schwab Corp. (The) | 1.14% | |
| Capital One Financial Corp. | 1.14% | |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 1.14% | |
| Mastercard Inc. | 1.14% | |
| Microsoft Corp. | 1.13% | |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.11% | |
| GE Vernova Inc. | 1.11% | |
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 1.11% | |
| Amgen Inc. | 1.11% | |
| Bank of America Corp. | 1.10% | |
| Visa Inc. | 1.10% |
By country
United States 96.95%Ireland 2.89%By asset type
Stocks 99.84%By sector
Sectors of the companies held, for the 94% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jul 31, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jul 31, 2026, investors added a net $68.6M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +4.53%, +0.78%, +0.89%.
How it works
EQWL tracks the S&P 100 Equal Weight Index, which S&P Dow Jones Indices compiles. That index holds every company in the S&P 100, a list of large US blue-chip companies across many industries. The S&P 100 itself is weighted by market capitalization, the total value of a company's shares, so the biggest companies get the biggest share. The equal-weight version instead gives every company the same weight at each quarterly rebalance. As of June 30, 2026, it had 101 members, ranging from $49.2 billion to $4.8 trillion in market value.
The fund uses "full replication," which means it generally buys every stock in the index in the index's proportions. It must keep at least 80% of net assets in index stocks or similar investments. Between rebalances, weights drift as prices move. Each quarter the fund trims stocks that have risen and adds to those that have lagged. Its portfolio turnover was 23%. As of July 31, 2026, the fund was 99.84% stocks with 0.07% in cash and no derivatives. The 10 largest positions made up 11.45% of the fund, led by RTX at 1.18%.
The fund owns shares directly. It uses no leverage or options. It concentrates in an industry only if the index does. As of July 31, 2026, technology was the largest sector at 17.9%, followed by financials at 16%, health care at 13.7% and industrials at 13.5%.
What it really costs
- EQWL charges 0.25% a year, versus an average of 0.1% for the similar funds below (9th of 9, cheapest first).
- The fee includes a 0.05% waiver from the adviser, which may end.
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $26 in the first year and $370 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQWL | $26 | $86 | $158 | $370 |
In a retirement portfolio
It spreads money evenly across about 100 of the largest US companies, so it could serve as a broad large-cap stock position rather than a niche bet.
EQWL could give a retirement portfolio broad exposure to US blue chips without leaning heavily on a few giant companies. It is still a stock fund, though, and it has fallen hard. It dropped about 49% from October 2007 to March 2009 and took about three years from that low to get back to its old peak. It fell 34% in early 2020 and recovered in about five and a half months. In 2022 it fell 23% and needed about 14 months. Its worst calendar year was 2008, down 33%. Selling shares to cover spending in years like those would lock in losses.
Its trailing 12-month yield was 1.56% as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly. That makes it a modest source of income. In the SEC's standard example, the fund costs $370 over 10 years on $10,000. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors who want US blue chips without relying on a few giants; no holding was above about 1.2% as of July 31, 2026.
- Long-term holders who can ride out deep drops, including a 49% fall in 2008–09 and about three years from the low to recover.
- People who like quarterly rebalancing that trims rising stocks and adds to lagging ones automatically across all S&P 100 companies.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-focused investors: its 0.25% expense ratio ranked 9th of 9 similar funds, against a 0.10% peer average.
- Those who want full exposure to the largest companies; Microsoft and Amazon were each only about 1.1% of the fund as of July 31, 2026.
- Income seekers who need larger payouts; the trailing 12-month yield was 1.56% as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQWL this fund | — | 0.25% | $2.70B | +14.3% | +23.2% |
| XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF | 68% | 0.15% | $274.6M | +14.1% | +21.1% |
| MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 47% | 0.07% | $10.90B | +13.5% | +26.0% |
| IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 46% | 0.15% | $2.19B | +12.5% | +25.5% |
| DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 45% | 0.08% | $42.77B | +21.8% | +20.6% |
| VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 43% | 0.06% | $99.19B | +19.1% | +21.2% |
| SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 42% | 0.04% | $35.30B | +16.8% | +17.8% |
| IVE iShares S&P 500 Value ETF | 42% | 0.18% | $47.74B | +16.7% | +17.7% |
Questions investors ask
Is EQWL good for retirement?
It may suit retirement investors who want a broad large-cap US stock holding that doesn't depend on a few giant companies. It owns about 100 blue chips at roughly equal weights. It is still fully invested in stocks, though. It fell about 49% in 2008–09, 34% in 2020 and 23% in 2022. Its trailing yield was a modest 1.56% as of October 27, 2026. It works as one piece of a diversified plan, not as a safe holding.
What's the difference between EQWL and XOEX?
Both draw on the S&P 100, and their holdings overlapped by 68%. EQWL owns every S&P 100 company, including the very largest, at equal weights. The Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX), as its name says, leaves out the 20 largest. XOEX costs 0.15% a year, compared with 0.25% for EQWL. As of October 27, 2026, EQWL returned 14.3% over one year and 23.2% a year over three years. XOEX returned 14.1% and 21.1%.
Does EQWL pay dividends?
Yes. EQWL pays dividends quarterly. It paid $2.07 per share over the 12 months to October 27, 2026, a trailing yield of 1.56%. The dividends come from the roughly 100 large US companies it holds, so the amount can change from quarter to quarter. The fund buys stocks for its index, not for their dividends. Investors whose main goal is income may want to compare it with dividend-focused funds.
What is EQWL's expense ratio?
EQWL's expense ratio is 0.25% a year, according to its prospectus filed August 27, 2026. In the SEC's standard example, $10,000 invested at a 5% annual return would cost $26 in fees over one year, $158 over five years and $370 over 10 years. Among nine similar funds it ranked ninth, the most expensive. The peer average was 0.10%, and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) charges 0.07%.
What are EQWL's top holdings?
Because EQWL weights its stocks equally, its largest holdings change with each quarter's price moves. As of July 31, 2026, the largest were RTX (1.18%), Booking Holdings (1.16%), Thermo Fisher Scientific (1.16%), Abbott Laboratories (1.15%) and Charles Schwab (1.14%). Capital One, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mastercard, Microsoft and JPMorgan Chase completed the top 10. Together, the top 10 made up just 11.45% of the fund.