At a glance
USCA charges 0.07% a year, below the 0.08% average of the 8 funds most like it (the 3rd cheapest of 9). It has $3.52B in assets, the 4th largest of that group; it paid 1.05% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned +9.2% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 8th of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +23.2% a year. Its ten largest positions make up 44.8% of the fund, out of 391 in all.
The short version
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA), from Deutsche Bank, tracks the MSCI USA Climate Action Index. That index holds roughly half the large and mid-size US companies in each sector, chosen for how they are handling the shift to lower carbon emissions. It charges 0.07% a year, just under the 0.08% average for similar funds. It still resembles the broad market. Its largest holdings were NVIDIA, Apple and Microsoft as of August 31, 2026.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
USCA +9.2% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USCA official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2024 | — | +27.02% | — | — | — | +27.01% |
| USCA price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +10.4% | +9.2% | +23.2% | — | — | +20.1% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, USCA returned +9.2%, 8th of 9 among similar funds.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2025 (+14.3%); its best was 2024 (+27.2%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 19.1% (Feb 19, 2025 to Apr 8, 2025), recovered by Jun 30, 2025.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data |
|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +10.4% |
| 2025 | +14.3% |
| 2024 | +27.2% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Before this security existed |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Before this security existed |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.3300 | |
| 2025 | $0.4800 | +9.1% |
| 2024 | $0.4400 |
What's inside
As of Aug 31, 2026, the fund held 391 securities; the ten largest made up 44.83% of assets.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 9.37% | |
| APPLE INC | 8.59% | |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 6.61% | |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 4.64% | |
| ALPHABET INC Class A | 3.68% | |
| BROADCOM INC | 3.09% | |
| ALPHABET INC Class C | 2.89% | |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 2.32% | |
| TESLA INC | 1.94% | |
| ELI LILLY & COMPANY | 1.71% | |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 1.42% | |
| JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY | 1.31% | |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 1.18% | |
| VISA INC | 1.16% | |
| MASTERCARD INC | 0.88% |
By country
United States 96.67%Ireland 2.13%Switzerland 0.25%Curaçao 0.17%Netherlands 0.11%By asset type
Stocks 99.63%By sector
Sectors of the companies held, for the 91.4% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Aug 31, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.What changed recently
- Over the three months to Aug 31, 2026, investors added a net $211.5M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: -2.05%, +0.93%, +2.98%.
How it works
USCA is an index fund that tracks the MSCI USA Climate Action Index. MSCI starts with its MSCI USA Index of large and mid-size US companies and removes several groups. These include companies with the most severe ESG (environmental, social and governance) controversies and those involved in tobacco, thermal coal mining, nuclear weapons, controversial weapons or oil sands. Also removed are heavy emitters and holders of large fossil fuel reserves that lack targets approved by the Science Based Targets initiative, and the bottom quarter of each sector on MSCI's Climate Risk Management Score.
MSCI ranks the remaining companies within each sector on four factors: emission intensity, revenue from green businesses, climate risk management and emissions track record. It keeps the top-ranked names until each sector has half as many companies as it has in the parent index. It then reweights the survivors to match the parent index, with company and sector weights allowed to differ by no more than 5%. That is why the biggest companies still dominate: NVIDIA was 9.4% of the fund as of August 31, 2026.
The fund aims to own every index stock in the same proportions. It held 391 stocks as of August 31, 2026, but it may hold a representative sample instead. It must keep at least 80% of assets in index stocks. Portfolio turnover, the share of holdings replaced over a year, was 12%.
What it really costs
- USCA charges 0.07% a year, versus an average of 0.08% for the similar funds below (3rd of 9, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $7 in the first year and $90 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USCA | $7 | $23 | $40 | $90 |
In a retirement portfolio
It holds about 391 large and mid-size US stocks weighted much like the broad market, for a 0.07% expense ratio.
USCA could serve as the main US stock holding for investors who want a climate screen while staying close to the market. Its beta, a measure of how closely it moves with the market, was 1.01 over the year to October 27, 2026. Its record is short. It launched April 4, 2023, so it has no history from the 2008, 2020 or 2022 sell-offs. Its weakest calendar year, 2025, was still a 14.3% gain. Its deepest drop was 19.1%, from February 19 to April 8, 2025. It recovered by June 30, about 2.7 months later. Anyone forced to sell near the low would have locked in losses.
Income is modest: a 1.05% yield over the 12 months to October 27, 2026, paid quarterly. In the SEC's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $90 over 10 years. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors wanting broad US large- and mid-cap stocks with climate and ESG screens, for a 0.07% annual expense ratio.
- People comfortable with heavy tech exposure: 39% in technology and about 45% in the top 10 holdings as of August 31, 2026.
- Long-term holders who accept market-like swings; its beta was 1.01 and its deepest drop 19.1% through October 27, 2026.
Look elsewhere if
- Investors wanting a long track record; it launched in April 2023 and has no history through the 2008, 2020 or 2022 bear markets.
- Those seeking meaningful income; the trailing yield was 1.05% as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly.
- Anyone expecting a strict fossil-fuel ban; the index excludes oil sands and thermal coal but still held 0.9% in energy stocks.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USCA this fund | — | 0.07% | $3.52B | +9.2% | +23.2% |
| USCL iShares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI… | 99% | 0.08% | $2.87B | +9.2% | +23.1% |
| MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 85% | 0.07% | $10.90B | +13.5% | +26.0% |
| BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 84% | 0% | $5.47B | +13.4% | +25.4% |
| SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF | 82% | 0.09% | $41.1M | +12.3% | +26.2% |
| SPYX SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 82% | 0.2% | $2.74B | +12.6% | +24.8% |
| XVV iShares ESG Select Screened S&P 500 ETF | 82% | 0.08% | $644.9M | +12.4% | +24.9% |
| USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 82% | 0.03% | $1.98B | +12.9% | +24.9% |
Questions investors ask
Does USCA hold oil and gas stocks?
Only a few. Energy stocks made up 0.9% of the fund as of August 31, 2026. The index doesn't ban fossil fuels outright. It excludes companies involved in thermal coal mining and oil sands. It also excludes companies with very high emissions or large fossil fuel reserves that lack emission targets approved by the Science Based Targets initiative. Energy companies that pass those screens can still be included if they rank well against their sector peers.
What's the difference between USCA and USCL?
Very little in what they own. Their latest N-PORT reports show USCA and the iShares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) share about 99% of their holdings. USCA charges 0.07% a year and USCL charges 0.08%. Returns have been nearly identical. As of October 27, 2026, both returned 9.2% over one year. Over three years, USCA returned 23.2% a year and USCL 23.1%. As of August 31, 2026, USCA had $3.52 billion in net assets and USCL had $2.87 billion.
Does USCA pay dividends?
Yes, quarterly. Over the 12 months to October 27, 2026, it paid about $0.48 per share, a yield of 1.05%. That is a small payout. The fund picks companies on climate criteria, not on dividends, so income is a side effect rather than a goal. Investors who mainly want income may find this fund pays too little to meet that need.
How has USCA done compared with the S&P 500?
It has trailed. As of October 27, 2026, USCA returned 9.2% over one year and 23.2% a year over three years. SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) returned 13.1% and 24.8% over periods ending October 29, 2026. Among nine similar funds, USCA ranked 8th on both one- and three-year returns. Its prospectus warns that the climate screens limit its choices and may cause it to lag funds without them.
What is USCA's expense ratio?
USCA's expense ratio is 0.07% a year, according to its prospectus filed December 18, 2025. That ranks 3rd lowest among nine similar funds and sits just under their 0.08% average. The SEC's standard example assumes $10,000 invested, a 5% annual return and shares sold at the end of each period. On that basis, total costs would be about $7 after one year, $40 after five years and $90 after ten years.