Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF

QQQGPacerEquity
Expense ratio0.49%
Net assets$20.4M
Holdings50
Yield (TTM)0.08%
1 week+3.4%
1 month-4.5%
3 months+5.1%
6 months+17.6%
YTD+28.8%
1 year+25.4%

Total returns with distributions reinvested; * a year. Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 · filings through Jul 31, 2026 · page updated Nov 3, 2026

At a glance

QQQG charges 0.49% a year, above the 0.33% average of the 8 funds most like it (the 6th cheapest of 9). It has $20.4M in assets, the 9th largest of that group; it paid 0.08% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, semiannual. Over the past year it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 2nd of those 9 funds. Its ten largest positions make up 39.2% of the fund, out of 50 in all.

The short version

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an index fund holding the 50 Nasdaq-100 companies that turn the largest share of sales into free cash, giving bigger weights to those with stronger price momentum. As of July 31, 2026, its largest holdings were chip and data-storage firms such as Western Digital, Seagate and Sandisk. It costs 0.49% a year, above the 0.33% average for similar funds.

Price history

The interactive chart needs JavaScript.

QQQG +25.4% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.

Prices through Oct 27, 2026. Total return: the price with distributions reinvested.

How it has behaved

Volatility (1 year)26.7%annualized; the S&P 500 is usually 15–20%
Worst drop (1 year)-13.8%3 years: -23.6% · all history: -23.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.68moves more than the market
Sharpe ratio (1 year)0.80return above cash per unit of risk
Since launch+20.8%a year over 2.2 years
52-week range$21.69 – $33.16
Last price $31.13 on Oct 27, 2026, 6.1% below the 52-week high · above its 200-day average ($28.18).
YTD1 yr3 yr5 yr10 yrSince start
QQQG official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025—+14.67%———+11.83%
QQQG price data to Oct 27, 2026+28.8%+25.4%———+20.8%
Multi-year figures are annualized total returns with distributions reinvested. "Official" figures are the SEC-standard returns from the fund's prospectus; the price-data row is computed from daily prices.
  • Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, QQQG returned +25.4%, 2nd of 9 among similar funds.
  • Its worst full calendar year was 2025 (+14.7%); its best was 2025 (+14.7%).
  • The deepest fall in its price history was 23.6% (Feb 19, 2025 to Apr 8, 2025), recovered by Jun 6, 2025.
15%202529%2026*
15%202529%2026*
Calendar-year total returns from price data, distributions reinvested. * 2026 is year to date. From the prospectus: best quarter +19.17% (Jun 30, 2025), worst -8.27% (Mar 31, 2025).
Show as a table
YearPrice dataProspectus (official)
2026 (to date)+28.8%—
2025+14.7%+14.67%
2008 financial crisis
stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009
Before this security existed
2020 COVID crash
stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020
Before this security existed
2022 bear market
stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022
Before this security existed

Dividends and income

Yield (last 12 months)0.08%distributions ÷ price
Paid in the last 12 months$0.03per share, split-adjusted
How oftensemiannual 
Latest payment$0.0100Sep 3, 2026
$0.022025$0.012026*
$0.022025$0.012026*
Distributions per share by calendar year, adjusted for a share split. * 2026 to Oct 27, 2026.
Show as a table
YearPer shareChange
2026 (to date)$0.0150
2025$0.0172
Distributions through Oct 27, 2026.

What's inside

As of Jul 31, 2026, the fund held 50 securities; the ten largest made up 39.21% of assets. It also reported 4.12% in a money-market fund, most likely cash collateral from lending out shares rather than uninvested money.

HoldingWeight
Western Digital Corp5.73%
Seagate Technology Holdings PL5.35%
Sandisk Corp4.65%
Applied Materials Inc4.37%
Lam Research Corp3.65%
Texas Instruments Inc3.42%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc3.26%
Analog Devices Inc3.16%
KLA Corp2.81%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc2.80%
Cisco Systems Inc2.64%
Fortinet Inc2.64%
Diamondback Energy Inc2.56%
Monster Beverage Corp2.27%
Datadog Inc2.23%

By country

United States 96.85%Netherlands 1.96%Uruguay 1.13%

By asset type

Stocks 99.94%

By sector

Technology52.8%
Health care5.5%
Industrials4.2%
Consumer discretionary4.1%
Communication services3.7%
Other companies3.0%
Energy2.6%
Consumer staples2.3%
Not classified21.8%
Sectors of the companies held, for the 78.2% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jul 31, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.

What changed recently

  • Over the three months to Jul 31, 2026, investors added a net $8.1M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
  • Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +15.13%, +6.59%, -9.12%.

How it works

QQQG tracks the Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. The index rules come from Index Design Group, an affiliate of the fund's adviser, Pacer Advisors. The index starts with the Nasdaq-100, which is 100 of the largest non-financial companies on Nasdaq. It removes companies with negative projected free cash flow or earnings over the next two fiscal years, plus financial and real estate firms. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus spending on equipment and buildings. The rest are ranked by free cash flow margin (free cash flow divided by sales) over the past year. The top 50 “cash cows” make the index.

The index doesn't size positions by company value. It weights its 50 stocks by a price momentum score, so stocks with stronger price trends get bigger stakes, capped at 5% each. It is rebuilt every quarter, on the third Friday of February, May, August and November. Weights can drift in between: Western Digital was 5.7% of the fund as of July 31, 2026. Turnover, the share of holdings replaced over a year, was 77%.

The fund generally owns every stock in the index. It uses no leverage, options or swaps. It is non-diversified, so it can hold bigger stakes in fewer companies. More than half its assets were in technology as of July 31, 2026.

What it really costs

  • QQQG charges 0.49% a year, versus an average of 0.33% for the similar funds below (6th of 9, cheapest first).
  • Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $50 in the first year and $616 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
Cost of $10,000 (SEC example)1 yr3 yrs5 yrs10 yrs
QQQG$50$157$274$616
SEC standard example: $10,000 invested, 5% annual return, shares sold at the end of each period.

In a retirement portfolio

RoleSatellite (higher risk)

It holds a tech-heavy basket of 50 stocks led by chip and data-storage companies, moved about 1.68 times as much as the market in the year to October 27, 2026, and has only about two years of history.

QQQG launched on August 19, 2024, so it has no record from the 2008 financial crisis, the 2020 COVID crash or the 2022 bear market. Its only full calendar year, 2025, gained 14.67%. Its deepest drop, 23.6%, ran from February 19 to April 8, 2025. It recovered by June 6, about two months later. Cashing out near that low would have locked in the loss. About two years of history says little about a long bear market.

Income is negligible. The 12-month yield was 0.08% as of October 27, 2026, paid twice a year, so spending money would mostly come from trimming shares. Its 0.49% annual fee is above the 0.33% average for similar funds. The SEC's standard example puts costs at $616 over 10 years on $10,000, assuming 5% annual returns. Past results don't predict future ones, and a plan needs to weigh the whole portfolio, not one fund.

Planning to live on your savings? See whether your whole plan holds up, with your real accounts, taxes and Social Security, in ReadyAimRetire.
Run my plan →

Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere

May suit

  • Investors who want a Nasdaq-100 slice limited to 50 high free-cash-flow companies, excluding financials and real estate, with no leverage or options.
  • Those comfortable with a tech-heavy fund led by chip and data-storage names such as Western Digital, Seagate and Sandisk as of July 31, 2026.
  • People wanting a small, higher-risk position alongside core funds, who can tolerate swings like the 23.6% drop from February to April 2025.

Look elsewhere if

  • Cost-focused investors: its 0.49% expense ratio compares with 0.20% for Invesco QQQ and 0.07% for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF.
  • Retirees needing portfolio income: the 12-month yield was just 0.08% as of October 27, 2026, paid twice a year.
  • Those wanting a long record or a large fund: it launched in August 2024 and held $20.4 million as of July 31, 2026.

Close alternatives

Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.

FundOverlapCostNet assets1 yr3 yr
QQQG this fund—0.49%$20.4M+25.4%—
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders…41%0.49%$2.21B+13.0%+27.1%
QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust Series I39%0.2%$490.10B+8.8%+24.0%
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF38%0.2%$200.0M+16.4%+29.5%
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum…35%0.58%$53.6M+34.1%+28.2%
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF34%0.35%$2.35B+23.1%+40.6%
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector…27%0.6%$165.9M+0.6%+10.8%
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF26%0.07%$33.30B+2.5%+23.2%
Net assets from each fund's latest N-PORT or annual report where available. Returns through Oct 27, 2026.

Questions investors ask

What does QQQG invest in?

QQQG holds 50 Nasdaq-100 stocks chosen for high free cash flow margins. That means they keep a large share of their sales as cash after paying for operations and capital spending. Financial and real estate companies are left out. Stocks are weighted by price momentum and capped at 5% each when the index is rebalanced. As of July 31, 2026, the largest holdings were Western Digital (5.7%), Seagate Technology (5.3%), Sandisk (4.7%), Applied Materials (4.4%) and Lam Research (3.6%). The top 10 made up 39% of assets.

What's the difference between QQQG and QQQ?

The main differences are stock selection, cost and size. QQQG starts from the Nasdaq-100 and keeps only the 50 companies with the highest free cash flow margins, weighted by price momentum. Its holdings overlapped 39% with Invesco QQQ Trust Series I (QQQ). QQQG charges 0.49% a year, against 0.20% for QQQ. QQQG held $20.4 million as of July 31, 2026; QQQ held about $490 billion as of June 30, 2026. Over one year, QQQG returned 25.4% through October 27, 2026, and QQQ returned 10.8% through October 30, 2026.

Does QQQG pay dividends?

Yes, but very little. QQQG pays dividends twice a year. Its yield over the prior 12 months was 0.08% as of October 27, 2026, or about $0.025 per share. The index picks stocks for free cash flow margins and price momentum, not for dividends, so the fund isn't built to produce income. Its returns come almost entirely from changes in share prices, which can swing sharply.

What's the difference between QQQG and COWG?

The main difference is the starting list: QQQG picks only from the Nasdaq-100. Both Pacer funds carry the Cash Cows Growth Leaders name and the same 0.49% expense ratio. Their holdings overlapped 41%, the highest of any similar fund. Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) is far larger, with $2.2 billion in net assets against QQQG's $20.4 million, both as of July 31, 2026. Over the year to October 27, 2026, QQQG returned 25.4% and COWG returned 13%.

Is QQQG good for a retirement portfolio?

It fits more naturally as a small, higher-risk position than as a core retirement holding. QQQG is non-diversified, meaning it can concentrate in fewer companies. More than half its assets were in technology as of July 31, 2026. In the year to October 27, 2026, it moved about 1.68 times as much as the market. It fell 23.6% from February 19 to April 8, 2025, before recovering by June 6. It pays almost no income and has about two years of history.

Sources

  • 485BPOS prospectus (risk/return XBRL), filed Aug 27, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • N-PORT holdings report, filed Sep 29, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • Prices: daily prices and distributions through Oct 27, 2026

For education only, not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.