At a glance
QQQG charges 0.49% a year, above the 0.33% average of the 8 funds most like it (the 6th cheapest of 9). It has $20.4M in assets, the 9th largest of that group; it paid 0.08% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, semiannual. Over the past year it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 2nd of those 9 funds. Its ten largest positions make up 39.2% of the fund, out of 50 in all.
The short version
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an index fund holding the 50 Nasdaq-100 companies that turn the largest share of sales into free cash, giving bigger weights to those with stronger price momentum. As of July 31, 2026, its largest holdings were chip and data-storage firms such as Western Digital, Seagate and Sandisk. It costs 0.49% a year, above the 0.33% average for similar funds.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
QQQG +25.4% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQG official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +14.67% | — | — | — | +11.83% |
| QQQG price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +28.8% | +25.4% | — | — | — | +20.8% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, QQQG returned +25.4%, 2nd of 9 among similar funds.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2025 (+14.7%); its best was 2025 (+14.7%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 23.6% (Feb 19, 2025 to Apr 8, 2025), recovered by Jun 6, 2025.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +28.8% | — |
| 2025 | +14.7% | +14.67% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Before this security existed |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Before this security existed |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.0150 | |
| 2025 | $0.0172 |
What's inside
As of Jul 31, 2026, the fund held 50 securities; the ten largest made up 39.21% of assets. It also reported 4.12% in a money-market fund, most likely cash collateral from lending out shares rather than uninvested money.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Western Digital Corp | 5.73% | |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PL | 5.35% | |
| Sandisk Corp | 4.65% | |
| Applied Materials Inc | 4.37% | |
| Lam Research Corp | 3.65% | |
| Texas Instruments Inc | 3.42% | |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.26% | |
| Analog Devices Inc | 3.16% | |
| KLA Corp | 2.81% | |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | 2.80% | |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 2.64% | |
| Fortinet Inc | 2.64% | |
| Diamondback Energy Inc | 2.56% | |
| Monster Beverage Corp | 2.27% | |
| Datadog Inc | 2.23% |
By country
United States 96.85%Netherlands 1.96%Uruguay 1.13%By asset type
Stocks 99.94%By sector
Sectors of the companies held, for the 78.2% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jul 31, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jul 31, 2026, investors added a net $8.1M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +15.13%, +6.59%, -9.12%.
How it works
QQQG tracks the Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. The index rules come from Index Design Group, an affiliate of the fund's adviser, Pacer Advisors. The index starts with the Nasdaq-100, which is 100 of the largest non-financial companies on Nasdaq. It removes companies with negative projected free cash flow or earnings over the next two fiscal years, plus financial and real estate firms. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus spending on equipment and buildings. The rest are ranked by free cash flow margin (free cash flow divided by sales) over the past year. The top 50 “cash cows” make the index.
The index doesn't size positions by company value. It weights its 50 stocks by a price momentum score, so stocks with stronger price trends get bigger stakes, capped at 5% each. It is rebuilt every quarter, on the third Friday of February, May, August and November. Weights can drift in between: Western Digital was 5.7% of the fund as of July 31, 2026. Turnover, the share of holdings replaced over a year, was 77%.
The fund generally owns every stock in the index. It uses no leverage, options or swaps. It is non-diversified, so it can hold bigger stakes in fewer companies. More than half its assets were in technology as of July 31, 2026.
What it really costs
- QQQG charges 0.49% a year, versus an average of 0.33% for the similar funds below (6th of 9, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $50 in the first year and $616 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQG | $50 | $157 | $274 | $616 |
In a retirement portfolio
It holds a tech-heavy basket of 50 stocks led by chip and data-storage companies, moved about 1.68 times as much as the market in the year to October 27, 2026, and has only about two years of history.
QQQG launched on August 19, 2024, so it has no record from the 2008 financial crisis, the 2020 COVID crash or the 2022 bear market. Its only full calendar year, 2025, gained 14.67%. Its deepest drop, 23.6%, ran from February 19 to April 8, 2025. It recovered by June 6, about two months later. Cashing out near that low would have locked in the loss. About two years of history says little about a long bear market.
Income is negligible. The 12-month yield was 0.08% as of October 27, 2026, paid twice a year, so spending money would mostly come from trimming shares. Its 0.49% annual fee is above the 0.33% average for similar funds. The SEC's standard example puts costs at $616 over 10 years on $10,000, assuming 5% annual returns. Past results don't predict future ones, and a plan needs to weigh the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors who want a Nasdaq-100 slice limited to 50 high free-cash-flow companies, excluding financials and real estate, with no leverage or options.
- Those comfortable with a tech-heavy fund led by chip and data-storage names such as Western Digital, Seagate and Sandisk as of July 31, 2026.
- People wanting a small, higher-risk position alongside core funds, who can tolerate swings like the 23.6% drop from February to April 2025.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-focused investors: its 0.49% expense ratio compares with 0.20% for Invesco QQQ and 0.07% for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF.
- Retirees needing portfolio income: the 12-month yield was just 0.08% as of October 27, 2026, paid twice a year.
- Those wanting a long record or a large fund: it launched in August 2024 and held $20.4 million as of July 31, 2026.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQG this fund | — | 0.49% | $20.4M | +25.4% | — |
| COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders… | 41% | 0.49% | $2.21B | +13.0% | +27.1% |
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust Series I | 39% | 0.2% | $490.10B | +8.8% | +24.0% |
| QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 38% | 0.2% | $200.0M | +16.4% | +29.5% |
| QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum… | 35% | 0.58% | $53.6M | +34.1% | +28.2% |
| XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 34% | 0.35% | $2.35B | +23.1% | +40.6% |
| QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector… | 27% | 0.6% | $165.9M | +0.6% | +10.8% |
| MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 26% | 0.07% | $33.30B | +2.5% | +23.2% |
Questions investors ask
What does QQQG invest in?
QQQG holds 50 Nasdaq-100 stocks chosen for high free cash flow margins. That means they keep a large share of their sales as cash after paying for operations and capital spending. Financial and real estate companies are left out. Stocks are weighted by price momentum and capped at 5% each when the index is rebalanced. As of July 31, 2026, the largest holdings were Western Digital (5.7%), Seagate Technology (5.3%), Sandisk (4.7%), Applied Materials (4.4%) and Lam Research (3.6%). The top 10 made up 39% of assets.
What's the difference between QQQG and QQQ?
The main differences are stock selection, cost and size. QQQG starts from the Nasdaq-100 and keeps only the 50 companies with the highest free cash flow margins, weighted by price momentum. Its holdings overlapped 39% with Invesco QQQ Trust Series I (QQQ). QQQG charges 0.49% a year, against 0.20% for QQQ. QQQG held $20.4 million as of July 31, 2026; QQQ held about $490 billion as of June 30, 2026. Over one year, QQQG returned 25.4% through October 27, 2026, and QQQ returned 10.8% through October 30, 2026.
Does QQQG pay dividends?
Yes, but very little. QQQG pays dividends twice a year. Its yield over the prior 12 months was 0.08% as of October 27, 2026, or about $0.025 per share. The index picks stocks for free cash flow margins and price momentum, not for dividends, so the fund isn't built to produce income. Its returns come almost entirely from changes in share prices, which can swing sharply.
What's the difference between QQQG and COWG?
The main difference is the starting list: QQQG picks only from the Nasdaq-100. Both Pacer funds carry the Cash Cows Growth Leaders name and the same 0.49% expense ratio. Their holdings overlapped 41%, the highest of any similar fund. Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) is far larger, with $2.2 billion in net assets against QQQG's $20.4 million, both as of July 31, 2026. Over the year to October 27, 2026, QQQG returned 25.4% and COWG returned 13%.
Is QQQG good for a retirement portfolio?
It fits more naturally as a small, higher-risk position than as a core retirement holding. QQQG is non-diversified, meaning it can concentrate in fewer companies. More than half its assets were in technology as of July 31, 2026. In the year to October 27, 2026, it moved about 1.68 times as much as the market. It fell 23.6% from February 19 to April 8, 2025, before recovering by June 6. It pays almost no income and has about two years of history.