At a glance
LCLG charges 0.85% a year, above the 0.3% average of the 8 funds most like it (the most expensive of 9). It has $107.7M in assets, the 8th largest of that group. Over the past year it returned +5.7% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 4th of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +27.7% a year. Its ten largest positions make up 43.4% of the fund, out of 55 in all.
The short version
Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG) is an actively managed fund holding about 55 large US growth stocks. As of July 31, 2026, its biggest positions were Amphenol, Broadcom and Apple. Its managers pick stocks using three tests: the economy, company research and price charts. At 0.85% a year, it costs far more than index-based growth funds such as Vanguard Growth ETF (0.04%), and it pays no dividends.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
LCLG +5.7% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCLG official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +18.00% | — | +13.92% | +16.76% | +16.27% |
| LCLG price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +8.3% | +5.7% | +27.7% | — | — | +19.7% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, LCLG returned +5.7%, 4th of 9 among similar funds.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2025 (+18.1%); its best was 2023 (+35.5%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 25.8% (Feb 14, 2025 to Apr 8, 2025), recovered by Jul 9, 2025.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +8.3% | — |
| 2025 | +18.1% | +18.00% |
| 2024 | +32.0% | +32.02% |
| 2023 | +35.5% | +35.49% |
| 2022 | — | -27.87% |
| 2021 | — | +26.01% |
| 2020 | — | +38.23% |
| 2019 | — | +39.12% |
| 2018 | — | -4.81% |
| 2017 | — | +31.31% |
| 2016 | — | +2.13% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Before this security existed |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Before this security existed |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $0.0300 | -92.3% |
| 2023 | $0.3900 |
What's inside
As of Jul 31, 2026, the fund held 55 securities; the ten largest made up 43.41% of assets.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Amphenol Corp | 5.56% | |
| Broadcom Inc | 4.98% | |
| Apple Inc | 4.62% | |
| Micron Technology Inc | 4.53% | |
| KLA Corp | 4.35% | |
| Flex Ltd | 4.25% | |
| Amazon.com Inc | 4.19% | |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.84% | |
| Mastercard Inc | 3.68% | |
| AppLovin Corp | 3.41% | |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.07% | |
| Fastenal Co | 2.93% | |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.68% | |
| Netflix Inc | 2.67% | |
| United Rentals Inc | 2.40% |
By country
United States 94.76%Ireland 2%Canada 0.94%Switzerland 0.65%By asset type
Stocks 98.35%By sector
Sectors of the companies held, for the 69.9% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jul 31, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jul 31, 2026, investors added a net $1.1M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +9.64%, +2.51%, -6.30%.
How it works
LCLG does not track an index. Logan Capital Management picks the stocks itself, because it believes earnings growth drives share prices over time. The fund's name stresses innovation, but its prospectus describes a large-cap growth strategy. At least 80% of net assets go into companies worth more than $5 billion that the adviser thinks can keep growing earnings for years. Up to 20% can go into foreign companies, including companies in emerging markets.
A stock must pass three separate tests. The first looks at the economy as a whole: growth, interest rates, inflation and Federal Reserve actions. The second is company research, starting with an in-house scoring tool that rates pricing power, balance sheet strength and barriers to entry. The third is technical analysis, which studies price charts to judge whether a stock is trending up. The adviser may sell a stock once it fails at least two of the three tests.
The prospectus gives no weighting formula or rebalancing schedule. The portfolio is concentrated. The 10 largest positions made up 43.4% of assets as of July 31, 2026, and information technology made up 38.1% as of April 30, 2026. Portfolio turnover, a measure of how much of the fund is traded in a year, was 7%. That fits a patient approach, and the adviser may hold stocks through short earnings setbacks.
What it really costs
- LCLG charges 0.85% a year, versus an average of 0.3% for the similar funds below (9th of 9, cheapest first).
- Of that, 0.65% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $87 in the first year and $1,049 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCLG | $87 | $271 | $471 | $1,049 |
In a retirement portfolio
It is a concentrated, high-cost growth fund that pays no income and has moved more sharply than the market.
LCLG could add a focused group of large US growth stocks to a portfolio, but it swings harder than the overall market. Its beta, a measure of how strongly a fund moves with the market, was 1.47 over the year to October 27, 2026. The ETF launched in August 2022, so its own trading history skips the 2008 and 2020 crashes. Its prospectus record goes back further and shows a 27.87% loss in 2022. The ETF's deepest drop was 25.8%, from February 14 to April 8, 2025. It recovered by July 9, 2025, about three months later. Anyone forced to sell during a drop like that would lock in the loss.
The fund paid nothing out in the past year, so it provides no income. Under the SEC's standard example, its 0.85% expense ratio costs $87 in the first year on $10,000. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors who want an active manager choosing about 55 large US growth stocks, with big stakes in chip companies like Broadcom, Micron and KLA.
- Patient holders who can accept swings bigger than the market's, such as the 25.8% drop between February and April 2025.
- People who prefer little trading inside the fund: portfolio turnover was just 7%, in line with a long-term, buy-and-hold approach to growth stocks.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-focused investors: at 0.85%, LCLG is the most expensive of nine similar funds. Vanguard Growth ETF charges 0.04% and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF 0.19%.
- Retirees who need income: the fund paid no distributions in the year through October 27, 2026, so cash would have to come from selling shares.
- Anyone wanting broad diversification: technology was 38.1% of net assets as of April 30, 2026, and the top 10 holdings were 43.4%.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCLG this fund | — | 0.85% | $107.7M | +5.7% | +27.7% |
| PWB Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF | 32% | 0.56% | $2.31B | +17.3% | +33.0% |
| IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 31% | 0.19% | $128.90B | -3.7% | +20.3% |
| GGRW Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF | 31% | 0% | $8.8M | +2.4% | +27.1% |
| WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF | 31% | 0.57% | $1.13B | +5.5% | +25.4% |
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust Series I | 30% | 0.2% | $490.10B | +8.8% | +24.0% |
| QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 30% | 0.28% | $2.65B | +12.3% | +30.1% |
| VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 30% | 0.04% | $379.29B | +3.8% | +25.1% |
Questions investors ask
Does LCLG pay dividends?
No. LCLG paid no distributions in the year through October 27, 2026, so its trailing yield was 0%. The fund's goal is long-term capital appreciation, which means growth in its share price rather than income. Its managers pick companies for earnings growth, not for dividends. An investor who needs regular cash from this fund would have to sell shares to get it.
What is the LCLG expense ratio?
LCLG's expense ratio is 0.85% a year, according to its prospectus filed August 28, 2026. That includes a 0.65% management fee. In the SEC's standard example, $10,000 earning 5% a year would cost about $87 after one year, $471 after five years and $1,049 after ten. That is well above the 0.30% average for similar funds, and it is the highest of the nine funds compared.
LCLG vs PWB: what's the difference?
Both are large-cap growth ETFs, and they share about 32% of their holdings, the most overlap of any similar fund. LCLG is actively managed by Logan Capital, which uses economic, company and chart analysis. Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) is larger, with $2.3 billion in net assets, and cheaper at 0.56%. As of October 27, 2026, PWB returned 17.3% over one year and 33% a year over three years. LCLG returned 5.7% and 27.7%.
Is LCLG good for retirement?
It may fit better as a small, higher-risk part of a portfolio than as a core holding. LCLG pays no income, charges 0.85% a year and has moved more than the market, with a beta of 1.47 over the year to October 27, 2026. Its deepest drop was 25.8% in early 2025, though it recovered in about three months. Its prospectus record also shows a 27.87% loss in 2022.
How has LCLG performed?
LCLG returned 27.7% a year over the three years through October 27, 2026, and 5.7% over the past year. It gained 35.45% in 2023, 32.04% in 2024 and 18.15% in 2025, and 8.26% year to date through October 27, 2026. Its prospectus reports average annual returns of 13.92% over five years and 16.76% over ten years as of December 31, 2025. That record starts before the ETF's August 2022 launch.