At a glance
ICVT charges 0.2% a year, below the 0.63% average of the 5 funds most like it (the cheapest of 6). It has $7.19B in assets, the largest of that group; it paid 1.5% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, monthly. Over the past year it returned +4.5% with distributions reinvested, 2nd of those 6 funds; over three years it returned +16.9% a year. At its worst it fell 32.2% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 23.4% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 2 months and 28 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 12.8% of the fund, out of 375 in all.
The short version
iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) tracks a Bloomberg index of U.S. dollar convertible bonds with at least $250 million outstanding. A convertible bond is a company bond that the holder can swap for a set number of the issuer's shares. The fund's 0.20% expense ratio is half the 0.40% charged by its closest match, SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF (CWB). It tends to swing more like a stock fund than a typical bond fund and leans heavily toward technology issuers.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
ICVT +4.5% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICVT official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +17.87% | — | +3.49% | +11.57% | — |
| Bloomberg US Universal Index index, same period | — | +7.58% | — | +0.06% | +2.44% | — |
| ICVT price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +9.3% | +4.5% | +16.9% | +4.3% | +11.9% | +10.3% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, ICVT returned +4.5%, 2nd of 6 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was +4.3% and its 10-year +11.9%.
- In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 32.2% and regained its old high 2.4 months after the low.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2022 (-20.7%); its best was 2020 (+61.0%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 33.1% (Feb 12, 2021 to Jun 16, 2022), recovered by Sep 8, 2025.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +9.3% | — |
| 2025 | +18.1% | +17.87% |
| 2024 | +10.6% | +10.70% |
| 2023 | +15.3% | +15.29% |
| 2022 | -20.7% | -20.86% |
| 2021 | -0.5% | -0.29% |
| 2020 | +61.0% | +61.67% |
| 2019 | +21.8% | +22.20% |
| 2018 | -0.3% | -0.82% |
| 2017 | +16.4% | +15.64% |
| 2016 | +9.8% | +11.13% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Lost 32.2% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 32.2%, back to its old high 2.4 months after the low |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 21.6% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 23.4%, back to its old high 28.1 months after the low |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $1.1500 | |
| 2025 | $1.7100 | -7.6% |
| 2024 | $1.8500 | +28.5% |
| 2023 | $1.4400 | +9.1% |
| 2022 | $1.3200 | -80.8% |
| 2021 | $6.8700 | +78.4% |
| 2020 | $3.8500 | +231.9% |
| 2019 | $1.1600 | -54.3% |
| 2018 | $2.5400 | +80.1% |
| 2017 | $1.4100 | -5.4% |
| 2016 | $1.4900 |
What's inside
As of Jul 31, 2026, the fund held 375 securities; the ten largest made up 12.78% of assets.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORP Bonds and notes | 2.96% | |
| ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING Bonds and notes | 2.02% | |
| LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC Bonds and notes | 1.45% | |
| COREWEAVE INC Bonds and notes | 1.05% | |
| BLOOM ENERGY CORP Bonds and notes | 1.03% | |
| NEBIUS GROUP NV Bonds and notes | 1.01% | |
| MKS INC Bonds and notes | 0.84% | |
| CLOUDFLARE INC Bonds and notes | 0.81% | |
| DOORDASH INC Bonds and notes | 0.81% | |
| CIENA CORP Bonds and notes | 0.80% | |
| GAMESTOP CORP Bonds and notes | 0.79% | |
| NEBIUS GROUP NV Bonds and notes | 0.74% | |
| WELLTOWER OP LLC Bonds and notes | 0.74% | |
| NEBIUS GROUP NV Bonds and notes | 0.73% | |
| COREWEAVE INC Bonds and notes | 0.71% |
By country
United States 82.59%Cayman Islands 4.69%Netherlands 4.22%Israel 1.86%Australia 1.53%By issuer
Companies 94.77%Other 3.99%The bonds mature in 3.9 years on average (weighted by size), with an average coupon of 1.54%.
Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jul 31, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jul 31, 2026, investors added a net $1.13B (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +7.33%, +0.80%, -6.71%.
How it works
ICVT follows the Bloomberg U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond >$250MM Index. This index is a slice of the broader Bloomberg U.S. Convertibles Index. It keeps only "cash pay" convertibles, which are bonds that pay regular interest. Zero-coupon, preferred and mandatory convertibles are left out. To qualify, a bond must be in U.S. dollars, have at least 31 days to maturity and have $250 million or more outstanding. It must also be registered with the SEC or issued under Rule 144A. Bonds may be investment grade, high yield (lower-rated "junk" bonds) or unrated. Each bond is weighted by its market value, so larger issues count for more. The index is rebalanced on the last business day of each month.
BlackRock Fund Advisors uses "representative sampling." Instead of buying every bond in the index, it holds a group of bonds chosen to match the index's interest-rate sensitivity, credit quality, yield and industry mix. At least 80% of assets must be in index bonds. As of July 31, 2026, the fund held 375 issues, about 0.95% cash and no derivatives. It may lend out up to one-third of its assets.
One mechanical detail matters. The index never converts bonds into stock, so the fund generally doesn't either, even when converting would pay. A convertible's price still tends to move with the issuer's shares. As a result, holders take on stock-market risk as well as interest-rate and credit risk.
What it really costs
- ICVT charges 0.2% a year, versus an average of 0.63% for the similar funds below (1st of 6, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $20 in the first year and $255 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICVT | $20 | $64 | $113 | $255 |
Structure and tax notes
- Bond prices move opposite to interest rates; the longer the maturities it holds, the more its price reacts to rate changes.
In a retirement portfolio
Convertible bonds tie much of ICVT's return to stock prices, so it has fallen sharply in sell-offs rather than cushioning them the way most bond funds aim to.
ICVT may add growth potential with some bond features, but it has not acted as a shock absorber. It launched in June 2015, so it has no record from 2008. It fell 32.2% from February 19 to March 23, 2020, then recovered by June 5, 2020. It lost 20.86% in 2022, its worst calendar year. Its deepest drop was 33.1%, from February 2021 to June 2022, and it took 38.8 months to recover, until September 2025. Anyone who had to sell shares during those stretches would have locked in losses. Income is modest: the trailing 12-month yield was 1.5% as of October 27, 2026, paid monthly. Costs are low at 0.20%, which works out to $20 in the first year on $10,000 in the SEC's standard example. Past results don't predict future ones, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors wanting broad convertible bond exposure for 0.20% a year, half the 0.40% charged by SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF (CWB).
- Those comfortable with stock-like swings, such as a 61.67% gain in 2020 and a 20.86% loss in 2022, in exchange for growth potential.
- Investors seeking exposure to companies like Western Digital, Lumentum, CoreWeave and Cloudflare through their bonds, with income paid monthly.
Look elsewhere if
- Retirees who need a steady bond cushion. ICVT fell 32.2% in early 2020 and took 38.8 months to recover from its deepest drop.
- Income seekers. The trailing yield was 1.5% as of October 27, 2026, and the average coupon was 1.54% as of July 31, 2026.
- Investors avoiding technology concentration or junk-rated debt. Top issuers include CoreWeave and Nebius Group, and the index allows high-yield and unrated bonds.
Close alternatives
Matched by bond funds with the closest average maturity and issuer mix (N-PORT).
| Fund | Avg. maturity | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICVT this fund | 3.9 yrs | 0.2% | $7.19B | +4.5% | +16.9% |
| CWB SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF | 3.9 yrs | 0.4% | $6.20B | +4.8% | +16.2% |
| PREF Principal Spectrum Preferred Secs Active ETF | 24.1 yrs | 0.55% | $1.77B | +0.6% | +9.0% |
| VRP Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 32.5 yrs | 0.5% | $3.02B | +1.4% | +9.3% |
| FPE First Trust Preferred Securities & Income E… | 35.3 yrs | 0.85% | $6.32B | -2.0% | +9.5% |
| FPEI First Trust Institutional Preferred Securit… | 36.7 yrs | 0.85% | $1.93B | +0.5% | +10.0% |
Questions investors ask
Is ICVT good for retirement income?
ICVT isn't built mainly for income. Its trailing 12-month yield was 1.5% as of October 27, 2026, paid monthly, and its bonds had an average coupon of 1.54% as of July 31, 2026. Most of its return has come from price changes linked to the issuers' stocks, and those can be large in either direction. It may suit investors who want growth potential with some bond features more than those who depend on steady payouts.
What's the difference between ICVT and CWB?
The main difference is cost. ICVT charges 0.20% a year, while SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) charges 0.40%. Both track Bloomberg convertible bond indexes, and both had an average maturity of 3.9 years. ICVT's index keeps only interest-paying convertibles with at least $250 million outstanding. As of October 27, 2026, ICVT returned 4.5% over one year versus 4.8% for CWB, and 16.9% a year over three years versus 16.2%.
Does ICVT convert its bonds into stock?
Generally, no. The index rules never convert bonds into common stock, whatever the share price, so the fund usually keeps holding the bond even when converting would pay off. Holders still feel stock moves, because a convertible's market price tends to rise and fall with the issuer's shares, especially once the stock nears or passes the conversion price. That is why ICVT's swings look more like a stock fund's than a typical bond fund's.
How has ICVT performed over the long run?
ICVT has beaten broad bonds over the long run, but with much bigger swings. Its prospectus shows a return of 11.57% a year over 10 years and 3.49% a year over five years through December 31, 2025. The Bloomberg US Universal Index, a broad bond benchmark, returned 2.44% and 0.06% over the same periods. ICVT gained 61.67% in 2020 and lost 20.86% in 2022. Its strongest quarter was 28.9%, and its weakest was -16.3%.
What does ICVT hold?
ICVT holds about 375 convertible bonds, mostly from U.S. companies. As of July 31, 2026, the largest positions were Western Digital (2.96%), Alibaba Group (2.02%), Lumentum (1.45%), CoreWeave, Bloom Energy and Nebius Group. Nebius Group and CoreWeave each appear through more than one bond. The 10 largest positions made up 12.78% of assets. U.S. issuers accounted for 82.59%, and the average time to maturity was 3.9 years.