At a glance
EFAX charges 0.2% a year, above the 0.12% average of the 8 funds most like it (the 7th cheapest of 9). It has $502.7M in assets, the 9th largest of that group; it paid 3.19% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, semiannual. Over the past year it returned +9.0% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), the weakest of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +19.8% a year. At its worst it fell 31.4% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 30.4% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 8 months and 17 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 15.3% of the fund, out of 643 in all.
The short version
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX), from State Street, tracks the MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index. The index holds large and mid-size companies in developed Europe, Australasia and the Far East, minus companies that own coal, oil or gas reserves. Its 0.20% yearly fee is below the 0.32% charged by iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA), but well above broad developed-market funds such as Vanguard's VEA at 0.03%.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
EFAX +9.0% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAX official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +30.87% | — | +8.39% | — | +8.75% |
| EFAX price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +7.1% | +9.0% | +19.8% | +7.7% | +8.7% | +8.7% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, EFAX returned +9.0%, 9th of 9 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was +7.7% and its 10-year +8.7%.
- In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 31.4% and regained its old high 7.8 months after the low.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2022 (-16.7%); its best was 2025 (+31.3%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 32.5% (Jan 17, 2020 to Mar 18, 2020), recovered by Nov 9, 2020.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +7.1% | — |
| 2025 | +31.3% | +30.87% |
| 2024 | +4.8% | +5.06% |
| 2023 | +18.0% | +18.22% |
| 2022 | -16.7% | -16.87% |
| 2021 | +10.5% | +10.74% |
| 2020 | +9.6% | +9.52% |
| 2019 | +23.5% | +22.86% |
| 2018 | -14.8% | -14.37% |
| 2017 | +23.9% | +24.67% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Lost 31.1% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 31.4%, back to its old high 7.8 months after the low |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 29.9% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 30.4%, back to its old high 16.9 months after the low |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.8000 | |
| 2025 | $1.6700 | +53.2% |
| 2024 | $1.0900 | +3.8% |
| 2023 | $1.0500 | +9.9% |
| 2022 | $0.9550 | -12.0% |
| 2021 | $1.0850 | +64.4% |
| 2020 | $0.6600 | -32.7% |
| 2019 | $0.9800 | +6.5% |
| 2018 | $0.9200 | -12.8% |
| 2017 | $1.0550 |
What's inside
As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 643 securities; the ten largest made up 15.28% of assets, and 2.07% sat in cash and money-market holdings.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| ASML Holding NV | 3.80% | |
| HSBC Holdings PLC | 1.62% | |
| Roche Holding AG | 1.44% | |
| Novartis AG | 1.43% | |
| AstraZeneca PLC | 1.41% | |
| Nestle SA | 1.32% | |
| Siemens AG | 1.19% | |
| Tokyo Electron Ltd | 1.06% | |
| Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc | 1.05% | |
| Banco Santander SA | 0.98% | |
| Commonwealth Bank of Australia | 0.95% | |
| Allianz SE | 0.89% | |
| Schneider Electric SE | 0.89% | |
| Kioxia Holdings Corp | 0.86% | |
| ABB Ltd | 0.85% |
By country
Japan 23.39%United Kingdom 12.75%Switzerland 10.4%Germany 9.13%France 8.39%By asset type
Stocks 99.11%Preferred stock 0.25%What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors withdrew a net $5.1M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +8.03%, +3.47%, +0.83%.
How it works
The fund starts with the MSCI EAFE Index. That index covers large and mid-size companies in developed countries outside the US and Canada. MSCI then removes energy, utility and diversified metals and mining companies that own fossil fuel reserves. That means proved and probable coal reserves, and proved oil and natural gas reserves used for energy. Any other company that owns reserves and earns revenue from activities such as thermal coal mining, oil and gas production or downstream activities is also removed. Coal used to make steel doesn't count. Companies MSCI ESG Research hasn't assessed are left out.
The companies that remain are weighted by free float-adjusted market value: share price times the shares readily available to trade. So the largest companies count most. The index is rebuilt each quarter at the close of the last business day of February, May, August and November. Because the screen looks at both reserves and revenue, the fund can still own some companies with reserves. Even so, at least 80% of its net assets must be in companies that own none.
State Street's SSGA Funds Management uses sampling. It may hold a subset of index stocks with similar risk and return, or nearly all of them. As of June 30, 2026, the fund had 643 holdings. It may also use depositary receipts and futures (contracts to buy or sell at a set price later) to manage cash. Portfolio turnover was a low 4%.
What it really costs
- EFAX charges 0.2% a year, versus an average of 0.12% for the similar funds below (7th of 9, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $20 in the first year and $255 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAX | $20 | $64 | $113 | $255 |
In a retirement portfolio
It adds stocks from developed markets outside the US, led by Japan, the UK and Switzerland, to a portfolio that may lean heavily on US companies.
EFAX launched in October 2016, so it has no record from the 2008 financial crisis. Its deepest drop came in the 2020 COVID crash. It fell 32.5% from January 17 to March 18, 2020, and recovered by November 9, 2020, about 7.8 months later. The 2022 bear market lasted longer. The fund fell 30.4% and needed about 17 months, until February 22, 2024, to recover. 2022 was its worst calendar year, with a loss of 16.87%. Anyone who sold shares that year to cover living costs would have sold at low prices.
The fund pays income twice a year, not monthly. Its trailing 12-month yield was 3.19% as of October 27, 2026. Its 0.20% expense ratio (the yearly fee, taken from fund assets) is above the 0.12% average for similar funds. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors who want developed-market stocks outside the US but want to exclude companies that own coal, oil and gas reserves.
- EFA holders who want a fossil-fuel screen at a lower fee: 0.20% versus 0.32%, with 89% holdings overlap.
- Holders comfortable with twice-yearly payouts; the trailing 12-month yield was 3.19% as of October 27, 2026.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-focused investors: VEA and SPDW charge 0.03%, and EFAX ranked 7th of 9 similar funds on cost.
- Investors who want energy stocks or the full MSCI EAFE; the prospectus warns that excluding reserve owners may cause returns to lag.
- Those who prefer very large funds: net assets were about $503 million as of June 30, 2026, the smallest among 9 similar funds.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAX this fund | — | 0.2% | $502.7M | +9.0% | +19.8% |
| EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 89% | 0.32% | $77.98B | +13.5% | +18.2% |
| IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 76% | 0.07% | $190.11B | +13.7% | +18.5% |
| IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed M… | 66% | 0.04% | $31.64B | +14.6% | +19.2% |
| SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 64% | 0.06% | $69.68B | +17.7% | +20.4% |
| SPDW SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | 59% | 0.03% | $40.29B | +17.3% | +20.5% |
| VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 58% | 0.03% | $316.42B | +16.8% | +21.7% |
| EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 51% | 0.33% | $29.11B | +21.9% | +23.3% |
Questions investors ask
What's the difference between EFAX and EFA?
EFA tracks the full MSCI EAFE Index. EFAX tracks a version that drops companies owning fossil fuel reserves. Their holdings overlap by 89%. EFAX charges 0.20% a year versus 0.32% for EFA. EFA is far larger, with about $78 billion in net assets as of July 31, 2026, against about $503 million for EFAX as of June 30, 2026. Over one year, EFAX's price return was 9% through October 27, 2026, and EFA's was 12.9% through October 30, 2026.
Does EFAX pay dividends?
Yes. EFAX pays dividends twice a year, not monthly or quarterly. Over the 12 months through October 27, 2026, it paid $1.70 per share, a trailing yield of 3.19%. The dividends come from the developed-market companies it holds, such as HSBC, Roche and Novartis. Payouts can change from one period to the next, so someone relying on regular monthly income would need to plan around the twice-yearly schedule.
What are EFAX's top holdings?
As of June 30, 2026, EFAX's largest holding was ASML Holding at 3.8% of the fund. Next came HSBC Holdings at 1.6%, then Roche, Novartis and AstraZeneca at about 1.4% each, and Nestle at 1.3%. The top 10 made up 15.3% of a portfolio of 643 holdings. Japan was the largest country at 23.4%, followed by the United Kingdom at 12.8% and Switzerland at 10.4%.
Is EFAX completely fossil fuel free?
Not entirely. The index excludes energy, utility and diversified mining companies that own coal, oil or gas reserves. It also excludes other reserve owners that earn revenue from energy uses of fossil fuels. A company can own reserves and still qualify if it earns no such revenue. Coal used for steelmaking isn't counted at all. The fund must keep at least 80% of its net assets in companies that own no fossil fuel reserves.
How has EFAX performed over the long term?
As of December 31, 2025, EFAX returned 30.87% over one year, 8.39% a year over five years and 8.75% a year since its October 2016 launch. Calendar-year results ranged from a 16.87% loss in 2022 to a 30.87% gain in 2025. Its weakest quarter was a 22.06% drop in early 2020. In 2026 the fund returned 7.08% year to date through October 27, which is not a full year.