At a glance
CIL charges 0.45% a year, above the 0.08% average of the 8 funds most like it (the most expensive of 9). It has $62.4M in assets, the 9th largest of that group; it paid 0.23% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, semiannual. Over the past year it returned +8.5% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), the weakest of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +19.1% a year. At its worst it fell 34.2% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 28.8% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 8 months and 17 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 3.8% of the fund, out of 511 in all.
The short version
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) tracks the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. The index holds about 500 large, profitable companies in developed countries outside the US. The biggest companies don't get the most weight. The steadiest stocks get more, and the jumpiest get less. That approach costs 0.45% a year, far more than the 0.03% to 0.07% charged by most broad international index funds it overlaps with.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
CIL +8.5% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIL official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2024 | — | +4.32% | — | +3.87% | — | +4.65% |
| CIL price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +5.4% | +8.5% | +19.1% | +7.3% | +8.2% | +7.2% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, CIL returned +8.5%, 9th of 9 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was +7.3% and its 10-year +8.2%.
- In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 34.2% and regained its old high 7.8 months after the low.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2022 (-16.0%); its best was 2025 (+33.0%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 36.3% (Jan 26, 2018 to Mar 18, 2020), recovered by Dec 3, 2020.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +5.4% | — |
| 2025 | +33.0% | — |
| 2024 | +3.8% | +4.32% |
| 2023 | +16.3% | +15.54% |
| 2022 | -16.0% | -15.80% |
| 2021 | +11.1% | +12.28% |
| 2020 | +7.2% | +6.09% |
| 2019 | +19.1% | +20.02% |
| 2018 | -13.3% | -13.28% |
| 2017 | +27.6% | +26.90% |
| 2016 | -1.1% | -0.82% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Lost 32.7% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 34.2%, back to its old high 7.8 months after the low |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 27.4% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 28.8%, back to its old high 17 months after the low |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.4747 | +1.0% |
| 2024 | $1.4600 | +19.7% |
| 2023 | $1.2200 | +39.7% |
| 2022 | $0.8734 | -36.2% |
| 2021 | $1.3700 | +93.0% |
| 2020 | $0.7100 | -33.0% |
| 2019 | $1.0600 | +7.0% |
| 2018 | $0.9908 | +13.7% |
| 2017 | $0.8716 | +14.7% |
| 2016 | $0.7600 |
What's inside
As of Dec 31, 2025, the fund held 511 securities; the ten largest made up 3.79% of assets, and 2.5% sat in cash and money-market holdings.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| CLP HOLDINGS LIMITED | 0.46% | |
| TELSTRA GROUP LIMITED | 0.40% | |
| LA BANQUE TORONTO-DOMINION | 0.39% | |
| THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA | 0.38% | |
| EMERA INCORPORATED | 0.37% | |
| BANQUE CANADIENNE IMPERIALE DE COMMERCE | 0.37% | |
| HYDRO ONE LIMITED | 0.36% | |
| Fortis Inc. | 0.36% | |
| POWER CORPORATION DU CANADA | 0.35% | |
| TELUS CORPORATION | 0.35% | |
| THE HONG KONG AND CHINA GAS COMPANY LIMITED | 0.34% | |
| Swisscom AG | 0.34% | |
| BANQUE ROYALE DU CANADA | 0.33% | |
| BANQUE NATIONALE DU CANADA | 0.33% | |
| Kirin Holdings Company, Limited | 0.32% |
By country
Japan 17.6%Canada 12.78%United Kingdom 9.03%France 7.31%Switzerland 6.49%By asset type
Stocks 98.74%Other 0.03%What changed recently
- Over the three months to Dec 31, 2025, investors withdrew a net $34.2M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +0.63%, +1.74%, +2.70%.
How it works
CIL follows an index run by Nasdaq, which is not affiliated with Victory Capital. The index starts with publicly traded companies based in developed countries outside the US, such as Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Hong Kong and Australia. Emerging markets are excluded. It keeps only companies with positive earnings over the past twelve months, then picks the 500 largest by market capitalization (share price times shares outstanding).
Next comes the weighting. Volatility means how much a stock's price swings. For each stock, the index measures the swings in its daily price changes over the last 180 trading days. Calmer stocks get larger weights and jumpier ones get smaller weights. No single country can exceed 20% and no sector 25%. The index is rebuilt every March and September. The result is spread very evenly. As of December 31, 2025, the largest holding, CLP Holdings, was 0.46% of assets, and the top 10 together made up just 3.79%. Telstra, Toronto-Dominion Bank, Bank of Nova Scotia and Emera came next.
The fund doesn't have to own every stock in the index. Its managers use a statistical process to pick a representative sample, which held 511 stocks as of December 31, 2025. This means returns can drift from the index. The fund is passive: it doesn't take defensive positions when markets fall. Portfolio turnover was 27%.
What it really costs
- CIL charges 0.45% a year, versus an average of 0.08% for the similar funds below (9th of 9, cheapest first).
- Of that, 0.4% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
- The fee includes a 0.15% waiver from the adviser, which may end.
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $46 in the first year and $736 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIL | $46 | $177 | $320 | $736 |
In a retirement portfolio
It adds about 500 developed-market companies outside the US, tilted toward steadier stocks, to a portfolio that may be mostly US-focused.
CIL could spread a stock portfolio beyond US companies. As of December 31, 2025, its largest country weights were Japan at 17.6% and Canada at 12.8%. The tilt toward steadier stocks did not prevent deep drops. The fund launched in 2015, so it has no record from 2008. In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 34.2% and took about eight months to recover. In the 2022 bear market it fell 28.8% and needed 17 months to recover. Its worst calendar year was 2022, at -15.80%. Anyone drawing cash in a year like that would be cashing out shares at low prices.
Income is small: the trailing yield was 0.23% as of October 27, 2026, paid twice a year. Costs are 0.45% a year. On the SEC's standard $10,000 example, that is $46 after one year and $736 over ten. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors wanting developed-market stocks outside the US, weighted toward steadier names rather than the largest companies.
- People who like very wide diversification: 511 holdings, with the top 10 at just 3.79% of assets as of December 31, 2025.
- Those willing to pay 0.45% a year for a rules-based tilt that caps any country at 20% and any sector at 25%.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-focused investors: similar broad funds such as VEA and SPDW charge 0.03% a year, against CIL's 0.45%.
- Investors seeking income: the trailing yield was 0.23% as of October 27, 2026, paid only twice a year.
- Anyone expecting the steadier tilt to prevent big losses: CIL fell 34.2% in early 2020 and 28.8% in 2022.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIL this fund | — | 0.45% | $62.4M | +8.5% | +19.1% |
| SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 50% | 0.06% | $69.68B | +17.7% | +20.4% |
| IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed M… | 48% | 0.04% | $31.64B | +14.6% | +19.2% |
| EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 48% | 0.32% | $77.98B | +13.5% | +18.2% |
| SPDW SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | 47% | 0.03% | $40.29B | +17.3% | +20.5% |
| VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 46% | 0.03% | $316.42B | +16.8% | +21.7% |
| IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 44% | 0.07% | $190.11B | +13.7% | +18.5% |
| VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Index Fund | 39% | 0.04% | $95.84B | +13.4% | +20.6% |
Questions investors ask
Is CIL good for retirement?
It may suit a supporting role rather than the center of a plan. CIL spreads money across about 500 developed-market companies outside the US, which can diversify a portfolio heavy in US stocks. But it costs 0.45% a year and pays little income, with a 0.23% trailing yield as of October 27, 2026. It also fell 34.2% in the 2020 crash despite its tilt toward steadier stocks. Past results don't predict future ones.
What does volatility weighted mean in CIL?
It means CIL's index gives more weight to stocks whose prices have moved less. Nasdaq measures each stock's volatility from the swings in its daily price changes over the last 180 trading days. Calmer stocks get bigger weights and jumpier ones get smaller weights. Traditional index funds weight by company size, so the largest firms dominate. In CIL, no holding topped 0.46% of assets as of December 31, 2025.
What's the difference between CIL and SCHF?
Both own developed-market stocks outside the US, and about half their holdings overlap, based on the latest N-PORT reports. SCHF is a broad international index fund charging 0.06% a year. CIL tilts toward steadier stocks and charges 0.45%. SCHF is far larger, at about $69.7 billion as of August 31, 2026, against CIL's $62.4 million as of December 31, 2025. Over one year, SCHF returned 17.3% (as of October 30, 2026) and CIL returned 8.5% (as of October 27, 2026).
Does CIL pay dividends?
Yes. CIL pays dividends twice a year, but they are small. Over the twelve months to October 27, 2026, it paid about $0.13 per share, a yield of 0.23%. That makes it a weak fit for someone who wants steady income from a fund. Its main appeal is spreading money across many companies outside the US with a tilt toward steadier stocks, not its payouts.
How has CIL performed over the long term?
Results have been mixed. The SEC-standard figures in its prospectus run to December 31, 2024. CIL returned 4.32% in 2024, averaged 3.87% a year over five years, and averaged 4.65% a year since its 2015 launch. Based on price, it gained 33.03% in 2025 and averaged 8.2% a year over ten years as of October 27, 2026. Over one and three years, it trailed all eight similar funds it was compared with.