VanEck Social Sentiment ETF

BUZZVanEckEquity
Expense ratio0.76%
Net assets$104.5M
Holdings75
Yield (TTM)0%
1 week0.0%
1 month-10.0%
3 months+6.1%
6 months+3.4%
YTD+8.9%
1 year-8.3%
3 years*+36.3%
5 years*+7.1%

Total returns with distributions reinvested; * a year. Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 · filings through Jun 30, 2026 · page updated Nov 3, 2026

At a glance

BUZZ charges 0.76% a year, above the 0.13% average of the 8 funds most like it (the most expensive of 9). It has $104.5M in assets, the 8th largest of that group. Over the past year it returned −8.3% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), the weakest of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +36.3% a year. At its worst it fell 47.1% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 29 months after the low. Its ten largest positions make up 33.2% of the fund, out of 75 in all.

The short version

VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) is an index fund that holds 75 stocks of U.S. companies with the most positive online chatter, as ranked by the BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index. Few funds pick stocks this way, using social media, news and blog posts. It is also costly: its expense ratio is 0.76%, against an average of 0.13% for similar funds, and its swings have been much larger than the broad market's.

Price history

The interactive chart needs JavaScript.

BUZZ -8.3% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.

Prices through Oct 27, 2026. Total return: the price with distributions reinvested.

How it has behaved

Volatility (1 year)35.6%annualized; the S&P 500 is usually 15–20%
Worst drop (1 year)-29.5%3 years: -30.5% · all history: -56.9%
Beta vs S&P 5002.37moves more than the market
Sharpe ratio (1 year)-0.35return above cash per unit of risk
Since launch+8.1%a year over 5.6 years
Total over 5 years+41%
52-week range$27.22 – $40.80
Last price $35.38 on Oct 27, 2026, 13.3% below the 52-week high · above its 200-day average ($34.78).
YTD1 yr3 yr5 yr10 yrSince start
BUZZ official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025—+30.59%———+5.86%
BUZZ Next Gen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) index, same period—+31.10%———+6.18%
S&P 500® Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) index, same period—+17.88%———+14.19%
BUZZ price data to Oct 27, 2026+8.9%-8.3%+36.3%+7.1%—+8.1%
Multi-year figures are annualized total returns with distributions reinvested. "Official" figures are the SEC-standard returns from the fund's prospectus; the price-data row is computed from daily prices.
  • Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, BUZZ returned -8.3%, 9th of 9 among similar funds.
  • Its 5-year annualized return was +7.1%.
  • Its worst full calendar year was 2022 (-47.7%); its best was 2023 (+54.7%).
  • The deepest fall in its price history was 56.9% (Nov 8, 2021 to Dec 28, 2022), recovered by Feb 13, 2025.
-48%202255%202334%202431%20259%2026*
-48%202255%202334%202431%20259%2026*
Calendar-year total returns from price data, distributions reinvested. * 2026 is year to date. From the prospectus: best quarter +35.66% (Jun 30, 2025), worst -33.34% (Jun 30, 2022).
Show as a table
YearPrice dataProspectus (official)
2026 (to date)+8.9%—
2025+30.6%+30.59%
2024+33.7%+33.76%
2023+54.7%+54.48%
2022-47.7%-47.67%
2008 financial crisis
stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009
Before this security existed
2020 COVID crash
stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020
Before this security existed
2022 bear market
stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022
Lost 46.8% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 47.1%, back to its old high 28.7 months after the low

Dividends and income

Yield (last 12 months)0%distributions ÷ price
Paid in the last 12 months$0.00per share, split-adjusted
How oftennone in the last year 
Latest payment$0.1200Dec 23, 2024
$0.052022$0.102023$0.122024
$0.052022$0.102023$0.122024
Distributions per share by calendar year, adjusted for a share split. * 2026 to Oct 27, 2026.
Show as a table
YearPer shareChange
2024$0.1200+20.0%
2023$0.1000+100.0%
2022$0.0500
Distributions through Oct 27, 2026.

What's inside

As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 75 securities; the ten largest made up 33.18% of assets. It also reported 6.12% in a money-market fund, most likely cash collateral from lending out shares rather than uninvested money.

HoldingWeight
Nebius Group NV3.73%
ImmunityBio Inc3.65%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc3.57%
Micron Technology Inc3.48%
SoFi Technologies Inc3.23%
Intel Corp3.21%
Marvell Technology Inc3.19%
Tesla Inc3.16%
GameStop Corp2.99%
Meta Platforms Inc2.98%
NVIDIA Corp2.93%
ServiceNow Inc2.89%
Microsoft Corp2.87%
Super Micro Computer Inc2.75%
AST SpaceMobile Inc2.73%

By country

United States 93.35%Netherlands 3.73%Australia 2.42%Cayman Islands 0.38%

By asset type

Stocks 99.88%

By sector

Technology42.0%
Communication services6.8%
Consumer discretionary6.3%
Financials5.6%
Industrials1.0%
Consumer staples0.9%
Health care0.9%
Materials0.8%
Not classified35.7%
Sectors of the companies held, for the 64.3% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jun 30, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.

What changed recently

  • Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors withdrew a net $7.6M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
  • Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +17.29%, +20.14%, -8.77%.

How it works

BUZZ tracks the BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index. The index provider, BUZZ Holdings ULC, built it with fixed rules applied by computer. The rules scan social media, news articles, blog posts and other online data for "positive insights." This score combines how favorably people talk about a company with how widely it is discussed. The 75 highest-scoring companies that also meet minimums for market value and daily trading volume make the index. As of December 31, 2025, those companies ranged from about $4.2 billion to $4.5 trillion in market value. Mid-size companies can qualify.

The fund is passive, or index-tracking. It doesn't try to beat its index. It generally holds the same stocks and keeps at least 80% of its assets in them. The index is rebuilt and rebalanced every month, so holdings change often. The prospectus reports portfolio turnover of 202%, which means the fund replaced the equivalent of its whole portfolio about twice in a year. That trading creates costs not counted in the expense ratio, and it can produce taxable gains.

The fund uses no leverage, options or swaps. As of June 30, 2026, it held no derivatives. Its 10 largest positions made up about 33% of assets, and technology stocks made up a large share of the portfolio.

What it really costs

  • BUZZ charges 0.76% a year, versus an average of 0.13% for the similar funds below (9th of 9, cheapest first).
  • Of that, 0.75% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
  • Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $78 in the first year and $942 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
Cost of $10,000 (SEC example)1 yr3 yrs5 yrs10 yrs
BUZZ$78$243$422$942
SEC standard example: $10,000 invested, 5% annual return, shares sold at the end of each period.

In a retirement portfolio

RoleSatellite (higher risk)

BUZZ holds a concentrated, fast-changing basket of popular stocks. It has fallen far more than the market, pays no income and charges a high fee, so it fits best as a small side position, not a foundation.

BUZZ launched in March 2021, so it has no record in the 2008 crisis or the 2020 COVID crash. In the 2022 bear market, it fell 47.1% between January 3 and June 16, 2022. It took about 29 months after that low to recover, finally doing so on November 7, 2024. Its worst calendar year was 2022, at -47.7%. Its deepest drop was 56.9%, from November 2021 to December 2022. Anyone selling shares to cover spending in 2022 would have locked in steep losses. It made no distributions in the year through October 27, 2026, so it adds no income. Costs are high: on the SEC's standard $10,000 example, fees total $78 after one year and $942 after 10 years. Past results don't predict future returns, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.

Planning to live on your savings? See whether your whole plan holds up, with your real accounts, taxes and Social Security, in ReadyAimRetire.
Run my plan →

Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere

May suit

  • Investors who want a small, rules-based bet on stocks with the most positive social media and news sentiment, such as Nebius, AMD and Micron.
  • Investors who can stomach big swings, like BUZZ's 47.7% loss in 2022 and its 54.5% gain in 2023.
  • Investors who don't need income from this holding, since it made no distributions in the year through October 27, 2026.

Look elsewhere if

  • Cost-conscious investors: its 0.76% expense ratio ranks last of nine similar funds, whose average is 0.13%.
  • Retirees who may need to sell in a downturn: after its 56.9% drop, it took until February 2025 to recover.
  • Investors who want a steady core holding: monthly rebuilds and 202% turnover mean holdings, and taxable gains, can change quickly.

Close alternatives

Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.

FundOverlapCostNet assets1 yr3 yr
BUZZ this fund—0.76%$104.5M-8.3%+36.3%
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF43%0.29%$42.5M+12.7%+38.8%
QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust Series I37%0.2%$490.10B+8.8%+24.0%
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF32%0.19%$128.90B-3.7%+20.3%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF30%0.04%$379.29B+3.8%+25.1%
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF30%0.15%$2.19B+12.5%+25.5%
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF29%0.07%$10.90B+13.5%+26.0%
VV Vanguard Large Cap ETF29%0.04%$73.83B+12.0%+23.8%
Net assets from each fund's latest N-PORT or annual report where available. Returns through Oct 27, 2026.

Questions investors ask

Does BUZZ ETF pay a dividend?

No. BUZZ made no distributions in the 12 months through October 27, 2026, so its trailing yield was 0%. The fund is built around online sentiment, not income, and many of its holdings are fast-growing companies that pay little or nothing to shareholders. Investors who need regular cash flow from a holding would have to sell shares to get it.

What's the difference between BUZZ and SFYF?

Both pick stocks based on social media popularity, and about 43% of their holdings overlap. The biggest difference is cost: SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) charges 0.29% a year, while BUZZ charges 0.76%. As of October 27, 2026, SFYF returned 12.7% over one year, while BUZZ lost 8.3%. Over three years, SFYF averaged 38.8% a year and BUZZ averaged 36.3%. Both are small funds.

What is the BUZZ ETF expense ratio?

BUZZ's expense ratio is 0.76% a year, according to its prospectus filed January 27, 2026. That includes a 0.75% management fee. In the SEC's standard example, someone who invested $10,000 and earned 5% a year would pay about $78 in fees after one year and $942 after 10 years. Among nine similar funds, BUZZ is the most expensive. The group's average is 0.13%.

What stocks are in the VanEck Social Sentiment ETF?

As of June 30, 2026, BUZZ held 75 stocks. The largest were Nebius Group, ImmunityBio, Advanced Micro Devices, Micron Technology, SoFi Technologies, Intel, Marvell Technology, Tesla, GameStop and Meta Platforms. Each made up about 3% to 4% of the fund, and together the top 10 came to about 33%. Technology was the biggest sector. The index is rebuilt every month, so this list can change quickly.

How has BUZZ performed compared with the S&P 500?

Since launch, it has trailed. As of December 31, 2025, BUZZ returned an average of 5.86% a year since its March 2021 launch, compared with 14.19% for the S&P 500. It was far more volatile along the way: it lost 47.67% in 2022, then gained 54.48% in 2023, 33.76% in 2024 and 30.59% in 2025. Its one-year return through October 27, 2026, was -8.3%.

Sources

  • 485BPOS prospectus (risk/return XBRL), filed Jan 27, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • N-PORT holdings report, filed Aug 26, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • Prices: daily prices and distributions through Oct 27, 2026

For education only, not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.