At a glance
SQLV charges 0.6% a year, above the 0.43% average of the 8 funds most like it (the 7th cheapest of 9). It has $28.7M in assets, the 9th largest of that group; it paid 0.99% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned +26.7% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 5th of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +18.1% a year. At its worst it fell 42.8% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 22.4% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 8 months and 15 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 7.1% of the fund, out of 321 in all.
The short version
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) is an actively managed fund that uses Royce Investment Partners' rules-based scoring model to pick cheap, profitable small US companies. It weights its 321 holdings (as of June 30, 2026) by business measures such as revenue, book value and free cash flow rather than company size. Its 0.60% fee tops the 0.43% average of similar funds, and it is the smallest of them by assets.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
SQLV +26.7% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQLV official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +2.46% | — | +9.02% | — | +7.90% |
| Russell3000Index index, same period | — | +17.15% | — | +13.15% | — | +14.15% |
| Russell2000Index index, same period | — | +12.81% | — | +6.09% | — | +8.22% |
| SQLV price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +24.4% | +26.7% | +18.1% | +8.1% | — | +9.7% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, SQLV returned +26.7%, 5th of 9 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was +8.1%.
- In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 42.8% and regained its old high 8.2 months after the low.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2022 (-12.9%); its best was 2021 (+37.2%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 48.3% (Aug 21, 2018 to Mar 18, 2020), recovered by Dec 23, 2020.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +24.4% | — |
| 2025 | +2.5% | +2.46% |
| 2024 | +4.8% | +4.83% |
| 2023 | +21.2% | +21.13% |
| 2022 | -12.9% | -12.85% |
| 2021 | +37.2% | +35.84% |
| 2020 | +7.2% | +7.97% |
| 2019 | +17.4% | +16.54% |
| 2018 | -10.5% | -9.15% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Lost 41.4% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 42.8%, back to its old high 8.2 months after the low |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 19.3% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 22.4%, back to its old high 14.6 months after the low |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.3800 | |
| 2025 | $0.5000 | +4.2% |
| 2024 | $0.4800 | +6.7% |
| 2023 | $0.4500 | +7.1% |
| 2022 | $0.4200 | -6.7% |
| 2021 | $0.4500 | +25.0% |
| 2020 | $0.3600 | +5.9% |
| 2019 | $0.3400 | +30.8% |
| 2018 | $0.2600 |
What's inside
As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 321 securities; the ten largest made up 7.07% of assets.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| VICTORY CAPITAL HOLDINGS INC | 0.92% | |
| DXC TECHNOLOGY COMPANY | 0.74% | |
| FEDERATED HERMES INC | 0.72% | |
| CABLE ONE INC | 0.70% | |
| CABOT CORP | 0.68% | |
| INTERNATIONAL BANCSHARES CORP | 0.68% | |
| BATH & BODY WORKS INC | 0.67% | |
| KYNDRYL HOLDINGS INC | 0.67% | |
| IRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS INC | 0.66% | |
| MONARCH CASINO & RESORT INC | 0.64% | |
| H & R BLOCK INC | 0.62% | |
| EVERFORTH INC | 0.62% | |
| AVANOS MEDICAL INC | 0.62% | |
| BELLRING BRANDS INC | 0.58% | |
| F&G ANNUITIES & LIFE INC | 0.58% |
By country
United States 97.43%United Kingdom 0.63%Cayman Islands 0.49%Israel 0.43%Bermuda 0.43%By asset type
Stocks 99.88%What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors added a net $0.00 (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +8.94%, +2.12%, +6.50%.
How it works
Instead of tracking an index, SQLV relies on subadviser Royce Investment Partners' quantitative process: computer models applying set rules. It starts with US-headquartered companies on US exchanges, minus real estate investment trusts, stocks priced at $1 or less and thinly traded shares. “Small” means no bigger than the largest company in the Russell 2000, a small-company index ($9.586 billion as of May 31, 2026).
At least 80% of net assets go to what Royce calls “quality value” companies, which beat the Russell 2000 median on at least one measure of cheapness (free cash flow or earnings relative to share price) or profitability (return on invested capital or assets). Royce ranks stocks within each sector and holds the top scorers. Thirty-day price momentum sets timing: Royce may wait to add a stock that has surged, but exits a surging stock slated for removal quickly.
Weights reflect book value (assets minus liabilities), revenue, free cash flow and dividends, not market value, to limit exposure to overpriced stocks. Royce generally caps each stock at 3% and each sector at 25% when added. As of June 30, 2026, the 10 largest of 321 holdings made up 7.07% of assets. Turnover, the share of holdings replaced in a year, was 57%; trading costs come on top of the expense ratio.
What it really costs
- SQLV charges 0.6% a year, versus an average of 0.43% for the similar funds below (7th of 9, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $61 in the first year and $750 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQLV | $61 | $192 | $335 | $750 |
In a retirement portfolio
It offers a focused tilt toward small, cheap, profitable US companies but has fallen as much as 48.3%, so it fits better as a smaller add-on than a foundation.
SQLV could add a tilt toward cheap, profitable small US companies beside a broad core fund. Launched in 2017, it has no 2008 record. In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 42.8% in under a month and then needed about eight months to regain its high. In 2022 it dropped 22.4% and took about 15 months from its low to recover. Its worst calendar year was 2022, a 12.85% loss. Its deepest drop, 48.3% from August 2018 to March 2020, wasn't made up until December 2020. Anyone cashing out shares for spending in stretches like these would lock in losses.
Income is modest: the yield over the prior 12 months was 0.99% as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly. The 0.60% expense ratio is above the 0.43% average of similar funds. Past results don't predict future ones, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors seeking a small-cap value tilt spread across 321 stocks, with the largest holding, Victory Capital, at about 0.92% as of June 30, 2026.
- People who like holdings weighted by revenue, book value, free cash flow and dividends instead of company size, chosen by Royce's rules-based model.
- Long-term holders with a broad core fund elsewhere who could sit through drops like its 42.8% fall in early 2020.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-focused investors: the 0.60% expense ratio is higher than six of eight similar funds, including SVAL at 0.20% and AVUV at 0.25%.
- Income seekers: the yield was 0.99% as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly, which provides little cash for spending.
- Those wary of tiny funds: net assets were about $28.7 million as of June 30, 2026, the smallest of nine comparable funds.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQLV this fund | — | 0.6% | $28.7M | +26.7% | +18.1% |
| EES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund | 25% | 0.38% | $724.3M | +19.4% | +19.9% |
| AFSM First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF | 25% | 0.75% | $128.2M | +22.2% | +22.0% |
| SVAL iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 24% | 0.2% | $198.4M | +30.9% | +22.5% |
| ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 24% | 0.34% | $61.5M | +24.4% | +19.9% |
| AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | 24% | 0.25% | $31.17B | +28.4% | +19.2% |
| JPSE JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap … | 22% | 0.29% | $591.2M | +15.9% | +18.0% |
| FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 22% | 0.72% | $194.5M | +27.4% | +18.4% |
Questions investors ask
Is SQLV an index fund?
No. SQLV is actively managed, though by a rules-based model rather than case-by-case judgment. Franklin Templeton offers the fund, and its subadviser, Royce Investment Partners, scores small US companies on value and profitability and weights them by fundamentals such as revenue and book value instead of size. Its prospectus measures results against the Russell 2000 and Russell 3000 indexes, but it doesn't try to copy either. As of June 30, 2026, it held 321 stocks, led by Victory Capital Holdings, DXC Technology and Federated Hermes.
What is SQLV's expense ratio?
SQLV's expense ratio is 0.60% a year, all of it management fee, per its prospectus filed July 24, 2026. In the SEC's standard example, $10,000 invested with a 5% yearly return and shares cashed out at the end would incur about $61 in costs over one year, $335 over five and $750 over ten. That is above the 0.43% average for similar funds; iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) charges 0.20% and Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) 0.25%.
Does SQLV pay monthly dividends?
No. SQLV pays dividends quarterly, and the amounts are small. Over the 12 months to October 27, 2026, it paid about $0.53 per share, a yield of 0.99%. Its stated objective is long-term growth of capital, not income. Dividends paid are one of the factors Royce uses to size positions, alongside book value, revenue and free cash flow, but the strategy does not target a particular yield.
What's the difference between SQLV and EES?
The main differences are cost and size: WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund (EES) charges 0.38% a year versus SQLV's 0.60%, and held about $724 million in net assets versus SQLV's $28.7 million, both as of June 30, 2026. The two share about 25% of their holdings, based on each fund's latest SEC holdings filing. As of October 27, 2026, SQLV returned 26.7% over one year versus 19.4% for EES, while EES led over three years, 19.9% a year versus 18.1%.
How has SQLV performed compared with the Russell 2000?
SQLV beat the Russell 2000 over five years but trailed it in 2025 and since launch. Through December 31, 2025, it averaged 9.02% a year over five years versus 6.09% for the index, and 7.9% a year since its July 2017 launch versus 8.22%. In 2025 alone it returned 2.46% versus 12.81%. The Russell 3000 Index, which spans the broad US market, beat both in every period. Based on price, SQLV gained 24.4% in 2026 through October 27, a partial-year figure.