At a glance
RWX charges 0.59% a year, above the 0.32% average of the 4 funds most like it (the most expensive of 5). It has $273.0M in assets, the 4th largest of that group; it paid 4.18% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 2nd of those 5 funds; over three years it returned +8.6% a year. At its worst it fell 43.0% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 32.6% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 15 months and 41 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 28.7% of the fund, out of 126 in all.
The short version
SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF (RWX), from State Street, tracks the Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Select Real Estate Securities Index. The index holds about 120 property owners and REITs outside the United States, and Japan is its largest country. The fund paid a trailing yield of 4.18% as of October 27, 2026. Its 0.59% expense ratio is the highest among similar funds, several of which charge 0.12% or less.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
RWX -4.8% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RWX official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +26.51% | — | +0.21% | +1.53% | — |
| RWX price data to Oct 27, 2026 | -4.8% | -4.8% | +8.6% | -2.7% | +0.9% | +0.5% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, RWX returned -4.8%, 2nd of 5 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was -2.7% and its 10-year +0.9%.
- In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 43% and regained its old high 14.5 months after the low.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2008 (-50.6%); its best was 2012 (+39.1%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 73.6% (May 7, 2007 to Mar 9, 2009), recovered by Jan 17, 2018.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | -4.8% | — |
| 2025 | +26.3% | +26.51% |
| 2024 | -12.2% | -12.03% |
| 2023 | +6.3% | +6.57% |
| 2022 | -21.9% | -21.85% |
| 2021 | +9.4% | +9.02% |
| 2020 | -9.0% | -9.08% |
| 2019 | +19.9% | +19.79% |
| 2018 | -8.2% | -8.37% |
| 2017 | +15.5% | +15.30% |
| 2016 | +0.3% | +0.15% |
| 2015 | -3.2% | — |
| 2014 | +4.3% | — |
| 2013 | +4.4% | — |
| 2012 | +39.1% | — |
| 2011 | -15.1% | — |
| 2010 | +22.1% | — |
| 2009 | +36.5% | — |
| 2008 | -50.6% | — |
| 2007 | -7.3% | — |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Lost 71.9% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 72%, back to its old high 73 months after the low |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Lost 41.4% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 43%, back to its old high 14.5 months after the low |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 32.6% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 32.6%, back to its old high 40.5 months after the low |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.8100 | |
| 2025 | $1.0300 | +3.0% |
| 2024 | $1.0000 | -6.5% |
| 2023 | $1.0700 | -0.9% |
| 2022 | $1.0800 | -34.5% |
| 2021 | $1.6500 | +65.0% |
| 2020 | $1.0000 | -71.1% |
| 2019 | $3.4600 | +85.0% |
| 2018 | $1.8700 | +65.5% |
| 2017 | $1.1300 | -64.2% |
| 2016 | $3.1600 | +174.8% |
| 2015 | $1.1500 | -19.6% |
| 2014 | $1.4300 | -23.5% |
| 2013 | $1.8700 | -31.3% |
| 2012 | $2.7200 | +101.5% |
| 2011 | $1.3500 | -60.2% |
| 2010 | $3.3900 | +101.8% |
| 2009 | $1.6800 | +6.0% |
| 2008 | $1.5850 | -12.0% |
| 2007 | $1.8010 |
What's inside
As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 126 securities; the ten largest made up 28.7% of assets. It also reported 3.64% in a money-market fund, most likely cash collateral from lending out shares rather than uninvested money.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd | 5.56% | |
| Segro PLC | 3.44% | |
| Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield | 3.12% | |
| Scentre Group | 3.06% | |
| Swiss Prime Site AG | 2.87% | |
| Link REIT | 2.65% | |
| CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust | 2.42% | |
| Klepierre SA | 2.02% | |
| PSP Swiss Property AG | 1.79% | |
| CapitaLand Ascendas REIT | 1.77% | |
| Merlin Properties Socimi SA | 1.67% | |
| Hulic Co Ltd | 1.54% | |
| Vicinity Ltd | 1.54% | |
| Nippon Building Fund Inc | 1.49% | |
| Aedifica SA | 1.47% |
By country
Japan 25.57%United Kingdom 13.56%Singapore 9.53%Australia 8.47%Switzerland 4.66%By asset type
Stocks 99.02%What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors added a net $2.3M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +7.13%, -1.47%, -2.05%.
How it works
RWX follows an index from S&P Dow Jones Indices that tracks publicly traded real estate companies outside the US. To qualify, a company must own and operate commercial or residential property. Most of its revenue must come from that property: at least 75% for new members. New members also need a float-adjusted market value of at least $200 million and enough daily trading. The index leaves out mortgage REITs, home builders, real estate brokers and specialty REITs such as tower and timber owners. It weights companies by float-adjusted market value, which counts only shares available to trade, so bigger companies get bigger weights. The index is reviewed and rebalanced every quarter, after the third Friday of March, June, September and December.
State Street uses a sampling approach. The fund doesn't have to buy every stock in the index, but it keeps at least 80% of its assets in index stocks or depositary receipts, which are certificates that trade in place of foreign shares. It may use futures and cash to manage money coming in and going out. Portfolio turnover was 9%, which is low.
As of June 30, 2026, the fund held 126 stocks. Japan made up 25.6% of the fund, the UK 13.6% and Singapore 9.5%. The largest holdings were Mitsui Fudosan (5.6%), Segro (3.4%), Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield (3.1%) and Scentre Group (3.1%). Returns also move with foreign currencies against the dollar.
What it really costs
- RWX charges 0.59% a year, versus an average of 0.32% for the similar funds below (5th of 5, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $60 in the first year and $738 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RWX | $60 | $189 | $329 | $738 |
In a retirement portfolio
It adds non-US property owners and REIT income to portfolios that are mostly US-focused, but its losses in downturns have been deep.
RWX could add exposure to landlords in Japan, the UK, Singapore and Australia to a portfolio built mostly from US stocks and bonds. Its trailing yield was 4.18% as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly. The trade-off is steep losses that took years to recover. The fund fell 73.6% from May 2007 to March 2009 and didn't regain its peak until January 2018. Its worst calendar year was 2008, a loss of 50.6%. It dropped 43% in the 2020 COVID crash. In the 2022 bear market it fell 32.6% and needed about 40 months, until February 2026, to recover. Anyone who has to sell shares or draw income in a year like those would be locking in losses. Costs are high for the category. The SEC's standard example puts them at $738 over 10 years on $10,000. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors with mostly US holdings who want non-US property owners, led by Japan at about 26% of the fund as of June 30, 2026.
- Income-focused holders comfortable with quarterly payouts that vary; the trailing yield was 4.18% as of October 27, 2026.
- Long-term holders who can ride out deep falls like the 73.6% drop in 2007–2009 without needing to sell.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-conscious investors: the 0.59% expense ratio is well above HAUZ at 0.10% and VNQI at 0.12%.
- Anyone who may need the money soon; the 2022 drop of 32.6% took about 40 months to recover.
- Investors wanting US REITs too, since this fund excludes the United States entirely and carries foreign-currency risk.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RWX this fund | — | 0.59% | $273.0M | -4.8% | +8.6% |
| IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate… | 57% | 0.54% | $83.0M | -6.7% | +9.5% |
| HAUZ DBX ETF Trust - Xtrackers International Rea… | 48% | 0.1% | $1.06B | -6.9% | +9.6% |
| VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF | 44% | 0.12% | $3.86B | -7.3% | +10.1% |
| RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 27% | 0.5% | $1.25B | +5.2% | +13.8% |
Questions investors ask
Does RWX pay monthly dividends?
No. RWX pays distributions quarterly, not monthly. Over the 12 months to October 27, 2026, it paid $1.08 per share, a trailing yield of 4.18%. The income comes from the rents its property companies and REITs collect and pay out. Payments can change from quarter to quarter because of company earnings and currency moves. Taxes withheld by foreign countries can also reduce them.
What's the difference between RWX and VNQI?
Both funds hold non-US real estate stocks, but VNQI costs much less: 0.12% a year against 0.59% for RWX. VNQI is also far bigger, at about $3.9 billion in net assets as of July 31, 2026, compared with $273 million for RWX as of June 30, 2026. Their holdings overlap by about 44%. As of October 27, 2026, RWX returned 8.6% a year over three years, and VNQI returned 10.1%.
What is the expense ratio of RWX?
RWX's expense ratio is 0.59%, according to its prospectus filed January 23, 2026. There is no fee waiver. The SEC's standard example assumes $10,000 invested with a 5% yearly return. On that basis, costs come to about $60 after one year, $329 after five years and $738 after ten. The average for similar funds is 0.32%, which makes RWX the most expensive of the five funds compared.
How has RWX performed over the long term?
Long-term returns have been weak. According to the prospectus, RWX returned 1.53% a year over the 10 years and 0.21% a year over the 5 years ending December 31, 2025. Results have swung widely from year to year. The fund lost 21.85% in 2022 and 12.03% in 2024, then gained 26.51% in 2025. Its worst quarter was a 30.58% drop in early 2020.
Is RWX good for retirement?
RWX could play a diversifying role in a retirement portfolio, but it carries real risks. It offers quarterly income and holds property companies outside the US, which most US-focused portfolios lack. However, it lost 50.6% in 2008. After its 2007–2009 fall, it needed until January 2018 to fully recover. Its cost is also high compared with similar funds. Past results don't predict future returns.