HCM Defender 100 Index ETF

QQHHoward Capital Management Inc.Equity
Expense ratio1%
Net assets$766.5M
Holdings99
Yield (TTM)0.19%
1 week+0.6%
1 month-4.1%
3 months+7.8%
6 months+10.5%
YTD+9.9%
1 year+5.5%
3 years*+25.2%
5 years*+10.2%

Total returns with distributions reinvested; * a year. Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 · filings through Jun 30, 2026 · page updated Nov 3, 2026

At a glance

QQH charges 1.0% a year, above the 0.26% average of the 8 funds most like it (the most expensive of 9). It has $766.5M in assets, the 9th largest of that group; it paid 0.19% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, annual. Over the past year it returned +5.5% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), the weakest of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +25.2% a year. At its worst it fell 28.7% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 39.2% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 4 months and 19 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 62.8% of the fund, out of 99 in all.

The short version

HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) tracks an index that its own adviser, Howard Capital Management, built and maintains. The index holds large US technology stocks while a trend signal is positive and moves partly or fully into cash when the market trend turns down. QQH charges 1.00% a year, far above the 0.26% average for similar funds. Part of its stock exposure comes through a leveraged ETF, which has made it swing more than the market.

Price history

The interactive chart needs JavaScript.

QQH +5.5% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.

Prices through Oct 27, 2026. Total return: the price with distributions reinvested.

How it has behaved

Volatility (1 year)24.9%annualized; the S&P 500 is usually 15–20%
Worst drop (1 year)-16.2%3 years: -24.8% · all history: -41.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.80moves more than the market
Sharpe ratio (1 year)0.06return above cash per unit of risk
Since launch+19.0%a year over 7 years
Total over 5 years+62%
52-week range$68.78 – $90.60
Last price $85.02 on Oct 27, 2026, 6.2% below the 52-week high · above its 200-day average ($80.57).
YTD1 yr3 yr5 yr10 yrSince start
QQH official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025—+15.65%—+13.74%—+20.06%
HCM Defender 100 Index index, same period—+16.34%—+15.28%—+20.76%
Nasdaq 100 Total Return Index index, same period—+21.02%—+15.30%—+22.02%
QQH price data to Oct 27, 2026+9.9%+5.5%+25.2%+10.2%—+19.0%
Multi-year figures are annualized total returns with distributions reinvested. "Official" figures are the SEC-standard returns from the fund's prospectus; the price-data row is computed from daily prices.
  • Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, QQH returned +5.5%, 9th of 9 among similar funds.
  • Its 5-year annualized return was +10.2%.
  • In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 28.7% and regained its old high 4.1 months after the low.
  • Its worst full calendar year was 2022 (-39.6%); its best was 2023 (+48.1%).
  • The deepest fall in its price history was 41.9% (Dec 28, 2021 to Dec 28, 2022), recovered by Jun 5, 2024.
42%202038%2021-40%202248%202334%202416%202510%2026*
42%202038%2021-40%202248%202334%202416%202510%2026*
Calendar-year total returns from price data, distributions reinvested. * 2026 is year to date. From the prospectus: best quarter +19.83% (Jun 30, 2020), worst -22.25% (Jun 30, 2022).
Show as a table
YearPrice dataProspectus (official)
2026 (to date)+9.9%—
2025+15.7%+15.65%
2024+33.6%+33.52%
2023+48.1%+48.00%
2022-39.6%-39.56%
2021+37.5%+37.84%
2020+41.7%+41.61%
2008 financial crisis
stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009
Before this security existed
2020 COVID crash
stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020
Lost 23.2% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 28.7%, back to its old high 4.1 months after the low
2022 bear market
stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022
Lost 39.2% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 39.2%, back to its old high 19.3 months after the low

Dividends and income

Yield (last 12 months)0.19%distributions ÷ price
Paid in the last 12 months$0.16per share, split-adjusted
How oftenannual 
Latest payment$0.1600Dec 16, 2025
$0.142023$0.162024$0.162025
$0.142023$0.162024$0.162025
Distributions per share by calendar year, adjusted for a share split. * 2026 to Oct 27, 2026.
Show as a table
YearPer shareChange
2025$0.16000.0%
2024$0.1600+14.3%
2023$0.1400
Distributions through Oct 27, 2026.

What's inside

As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 99 securities; the ten largest made up 62.75% of assets.

HoldingWeight
PROSHARES UL QQQ19.63%
APPLE INC8.97%
NVIDIA CORP7.25%
MICROSOFT CORP5.75%
AMAZON.COM INC4.22%
TESLA INC4.05%
META PLATFORMS INC3.68%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC3.39%
BROADCOM INC3.32%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC2.49%
ALPHABET INC Class A2.15%
ALPHABET INC Class C2.14%
INTEL CORP1.64%
WALMART INC1.62%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC1.56%

By country

United States 98.08%Ireland 1.39%Netherlands 0.23%Cayman Islands 0.18%United Kingdom 0.06%

By asset type

Stocks 99.95%

By sector

Technology45.5%
Consumer discretionary11.1%
Communication services10.0%
Consumer staples4.2%
Health care1.4%
Industrials1.3%
Utilities0.8%
Other companies0.6%
Financials0.2%
Energy0.1%
Not classified24.7%
Sectors of the companies held, for the 75.3% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jun 30, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.

What changed recently

  • Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors withdrew a net $9.0M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
  • Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +10.12%, +14.55%, -2.97%.

How it works

QQH aims to match the HCM Defender 100 Index before fees. Howard Capital Management, the fund's adviser, created the index and maintains it. Its stocks come from the Solactive US Technology 100 Index, which holds the largest and most liquid companies classified as technology under the TRBC sector system. The fund keeps at least 80% of its net assets in the index's securities. It uses representative sampling, which means it can hold a sample of the index rather than every stock.

A proprietary trend model called the BuyLine decides how much is in stocks. It watches the Solactive US Large Cap Index. If that index closes 3.5% below the BuyLine, the index shifts to 70% stocks and 30% cash. At 6.5% below, it shifts to 40% stocks and 60% cash. At 12% below, it goes all cash. It moves back into stocks after five straight closes above the BuyLine.

To match its index, the fund can use derivatives and leveraged ETFs. It can also put up to 20% of its assets in futures, options, swaps and other instruments. As of June 30, 2026, its largest holding was ProShares Ultra QQQ, a leveraged fund, at 19.6% of assets, and cash was 0.12%. Most leveraged ETFs reset daily, so over longer periods their returns can drift well away from a simple multiple of their index. Portfolio turnover was 75%.

What it really costs

  • QQH charges 1% a year, versus an average of 0.26% for the similar funds below (9th of 9, cheapest first).
  • Of that, 0.77% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
  • Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $102 in the first year and $1,225 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
Cost of $10,000 (SEC example)1 yr3 yrs5 yrs10 yrs
QQH$102$318$552$1,225
SEC standard example: $10,000 invested, 5% annual return, shares sold at the end of each period.

In a retirement portfolio

RoleSatellite (higher risk)

QQH is concentrated in large US tech stocks, holds a leveraged ETF and costs 1.00% a year, so it fits best as a small, higher-risk slice rather than a foundation.

QQH's trend model is meant to cut stock exposure in downturns, but the fund has still taken deep losses. In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 28.7% between February 19 and March 16, 2020, then recovered by July 2020. In 2022 it lost 39.6%, its worst calendar year. Its deepest drop was 41.9%, from December 2021 to December 2022, and it did not recover until June 2024. The fund launched in October 2019, so it has no 2008 record. Anyone who had to sell shares for spending money in those stretches would have locked in large losses. The fund pays little income: its yield was 0.19% as of October 27, 2026, paid once a year. Costs add up too. In the SEC's standard example, $10,000 invested would pay $1,225 in expenses over 10 years. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.

Planning to live on your savings? See whether your whole plan holds up, with your real accounts, taxes and Social Security, in ReadyAimRetire.
Run my plan →

Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere

May suit

  • Investors who want a rules-based trend signal that can move a tech-stock portfolio partly or fully into cash when the US market falls.
  • Investors comfortable with heavy concentration: as of June 30, 2026, ProShares Ultra QQQ, Apple, Nvidia and Microsoft made up about 42% of assets.
  • Investors using a small satellite slice who accept swings of about 1.8 times the market's over the year to October 27, 2026.

Look elsewhere if

  • Cost-focused investors: QQH's 1.00% expense ratio compares with 0.15% for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM), which shares 76% of its holdings.
  • Investors who need income: the yield was 0.19% as of October 27, 2026, paid once a year.
  • Anyone expecting the trend model to prevent deep losses: QQH lost 39.6% in 2022 and did not regain its peak until June 2024.

Close alternatives

Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.

FundOverlapCostNet assets1 yr3 yr
QQH this fund—1%$766.5M+5.5%+25.2%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF76%0.15%$104.38B+8.8%+24.1%
QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust Series I74%0.2%$490.10B+8.8%+24.0%
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF67%0.21%$10.75B+13.3%+28.9%
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF56%0.41%$10.71B+21.3%+38.6%
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF54%0.39%$23.58B+13.9%+30.4%
SPYX SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF53%0.2%$2.74B+12.6%+24.8%
XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund48%0.08%$123.91B+20.1%+4.0%
Net assets from each fund's latest N-PORT or annual report where available. Returns through Oct 27, 2026.

Questions investors ask

Is QQH good for retirement?

QQH fits better as a small, higher-risk satellite than as a core retirement holding. It is concentrated in large US tech stocks, holds part of its exposure through a leveraged ETF and charges 1.00% a year. Its trend model can move into cash, but the fund still lost 39.6% in 2022 and took until June 2024 to recover from its deepest drop. Its yield of 0.19% as of October 27, 2026, provides very little income.

What's the difference between QQH and QQQM?

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 and stays fully invested. QQH follows an index of large tech stocks, built by its own adviser, that can shift into cash on a trend signal, and it holds a leveraged ETF. The two funds share 76% of their holdings. QQQM charges 0.15% a year and QQH charges 1.00%. Over the five years to December 31, 2025, QQH returned 13.74% a year, compared with 15.30% for the Nasdaq 100 Total Return Index.

How does the HCM BuyLine work?

The BuyLine is a proprietary trend model from Howard Capital Management that it applies to the Solactive US Large Cap Index. If that index closes 3.5% below the BuyLine, QQH's index moves to 70% stocks and 30% cash. At 6.5% below, it moves to 40% stocks. At 12% below, it goes all cash. It moves back into stocks after five straight closes above the BuyLine. As of June 30, 2026, the fund was almost fully invested, with 0.12% in cash.

Does QQH use leverage?

Yes, indirectly. QQH is not a leveraged fund itself, but it can hold leveraged ETFs to help match its index. As of June 30, 2026, its largest position was ProShares Ultra QQQ, at 19.6% of assets. Leveraged ETFs magnify both gains and losses, and most reset daily, so their long-term returns can drift from their benchmark. This helps explain why QQH's beta was 1.8 over the year to October 27, 2026, meaning it moved more than the market.

Does QQH pay dividends?

Yes, but very little. QQH pays a distribution once a year. Over the 12 months to October 27, 2026, it paid about $0.16 per share, a yield of 0.19%. Large technology companies tend to pay small dividends compared with their share prices, and the fund keeps part of its assets in another ETF. Investors looking for steady income from a portfolio would get little from this fund.

Sources

  • 485BPOS prospectus (risk/return XBRL), filed Oct 28, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • N-PORT holdings report, filed Aug 27, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • Prices: daily prices and distributions through Oct 27, 2026

For education only, not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.