At a glance
IWO charges 0.24% a year, above the 0.11% average of the 8 funds most like it (the most expensive of 9). It has $15.43B in assets, the 3rd largest of that group; it paid 0.48% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned +6.0% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), the weakest of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +18.8% a year. At its worst it fell 39.8% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 34.4% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 5 months and 28 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 6.0% of the fund, out of 1,133 in all.
The short version
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) is a BlackRock index fund that tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Index. It holds more than 1,100 small US companies with faster sales growth and higher growth forecasts. It is large and spread thin, with $15.4 billion in net assets as of June 30, 2026. Its main drawback is cost. It charges 0.24% a year, the highest of the nine similar funds compared and more than double the 0.10% charged by Vanguard's VTWG, which follows the same strategy.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
IWO +6.0% over the year to Nov 2, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWO official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +12.92% | — | +3.11% | +9.54% | — |
| Russell 3000 Index index, same period | — | +17.15% | — | +13.15% | +14.29% | — |
| IWO price data to Nov 2, 2026 | +8.3% | +6.0% | +18.8% | +2.7% | +10.6% | +8.8% |
- Over the year to Nov 2, 2026, IWO returned +6.0%, 9th of 9 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was +2.7% and its 10-year +10.6%.
- In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 39.8% and regained its old high 4.8 months after the low.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2008 (-38.5%); its best was 2013 (+43.3%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 57.6% (Oct 10, 2007 to Mar 9, 2009), recovered by Dec 21, 2010.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +8.3% | — |
| 2025 | +12.9% | +12.92% |
| 2024 | +15.0% | +15.04% |
| 2023 | +18.5% | +18.58% |
| 2022 | -26.3% | -26.33% |
| 2021 | +2.5% | +2.71% |
| 2020 | +34.7% | +34.52% |
| 2019 | +28.5% | +28.46% |
| 2018 | -9.4% | -9.33% |
| 2017 | +22.3% | +22.24% |
| 2016 | +11.7% | +11.47% |
| 2015 | -1.3% | — |
| 2014 | +5.8% | — |
| 2013 | +43.3% | — |
| 2012 | +14.8% | — |
| 2011 | -3.0% | — |
| 2010 | +29.4% | — |
| 2009 | +34.6% | — |
| 2008 | -38.5% | — |
| 2007 | +6.9% | — |
| 2006 | +13.2% | — |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Lost 57.5% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 57.6%, back to its old high 21.4 months after the low |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Lost 38.5% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 39.8%, back to its old high 4.8 months after the low |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 29.6% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 34.4%, back to its old high 28 months after the low |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.9500 | |
| 2025 | $1.8000 | -21.7% |
| 2024 | $2.3000 | +25.0% |
| 2023 | $1.8400 | +17.2% |
| 2022 | $1.5700 | +68.8% |
| 2021 | $0.9300 | -27.3% |
| 2020 | $1.2800 | -15.2% |
| 2019 | $1.5100 | +18.9% |
| 2018 | $1.2700 | -7.3% |
| 2017 | $1.3700 | -8.1% |
| 2016 | $1.4900 | +19.2% |
| 2015 | $1.2500 | +21.4% |
| 2014 | $1.0300 | +6.2% |
| 2013 | $0.9700 | -29.7% |
| 2012 | $1.3800 | +137.9% |
| 2011 | $0.5800 | 0.0% |
| 2010 | $0.5800 | +70.6% |
| 2009 | $0.3400 | -39.3% |
| 2008 | $0.5600 | +12.0% |
| 2007 | $0.5000 | +100.0% |
| 2006 | $0.2500 |
What's inside
As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 1,133 securities; the ten largest made up 6.04% of assets. It also reported 14.76% in a money-market fund, most likely cash collateral from lending out shares rather than uninvested money.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Moog, Inc. | 0.73% | |
| BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. | 0.68% | |
| MaxLinear, Inc. | 0.66% | |
| Argan, Inc. | 0.66% | |
| JFrog Ltd. | 0.59% | |
| Krystal Biotech, Inc. | 0.58% | |
| ESCO Technologies, Inc. | 0.56% | |
| FirstCash Holdings, Inc. | 0.53% | |
| D-Wave Quantum, Inc. | 0.53% | |
| StoneX Group, Inc. | 0.52% | |
| Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. | 0.51% | |
| Cipher Digital, Inc. | 0.50% | |
| Plexus Corp. | 0.49% | |
| EnerSys | 0.49% | |
| Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. | 0.48% |
By country
United States 92.38%Canada 2.27%Cayman Islands 1.07%Israel 0.72%United Kingdom 0.68%By asset type
Stocks 99.62%Other 0.01%What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors added a net $166.7M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +14.67%, +5.83%, +3.53%.
How it works
IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Index from FTSE Russell, part of the London Stock Exchange Group. The index starts with the Russell 2000, a measure of small US companies. It keeps the ones that look more growth-oriented: higher price-to-book ratios (share price compared with the company's accounting net worth), faster past sales growth per share and higher forecast growth. As of March 31, 2026, this group made up about 66% of the Russell 2000's total market value. Healthcare, industrials and technology companies made up a significant portion.
The index rebalances every quarter, after the market closes on the third Friday of March, June, September and December. At each rebalance, no single company can be more than 22.5% of the index. Companies above 4.5% can't total more than 45% combined. In practice the fund is very spread out. It had 1,133 holdings as of June 30, 2026, and its top 10 made up about 6% of assets.
BlackRock uses representative sampling. This means it buys a sample of stocks chosen to match the index's overall traits, so it may not own every stock in the index. It must keep at least 80% of net assets in index stocks. It may use derivatives such as Russell 2000 stock index futures, and it may lend out securities worth up to one-third of its total assets. The prospectus lists portfolio turnover of 32%.
What it really costs
- IWO charges 0.24% a year, versus an average of 0.11% for the similar funds below (9th of 9, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $25 in the first year and $306 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWO | $25 | $77 | $135 | $306 |
In a retirement portfolio
IWO adds small-company growth stocks that large-company funds barely hold, but it has fallen much further than the broad market in past downturns.
IWO adds small, fast-growing US companies to a portfolio, and that comes with sharp swings. It fell 57.6% from October 2007 to March 2009 and took about 21 months to get back to its old peak. It dropped 39.8% in the 2020 COVID crash and recovered in about five months. It lost 34.4% in 2022 and took 28 months to recover, by October 2024. Its worst calendar year was 2008, with a 38.5% loss. Someone who had to sell shares or draw income in a year like that would lock in deep losses.
It pays little income: the trailing yield was 0.47% as of October 29, 2026, paid quarterly. It costs 0.24% a year, which is $306 over 10 years in the SEC's standard $10,000 example and more than similar funds charge. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors wanting a small slice of US small-company growth stocks, spread across 1,133 holdings with no stock above 1% as of June 30, 2026.
- Long-term holders who can sit through deep drops, like the 34.4% fall in 2022 that took 28 months to recover.
- Those who prefer a large, long-running fund: launched in 2000, with $15.4 billion in net assets as of June 30, 2026.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-focused investors: the 0.24% expense ratio is the highest of nine similar funds, and VTWG charges 0.10% for the same strategy.
- Anyone seeking income: the trailing yield was 0.47% as of October 29, 2026, paid quarterly.
- Those wanting steadier returns: the 5-year average annual return was 3.11% through December 31, 2025, against 13.15% for the Russell 3000 Index.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWO this fund | — | 0.24% | $15.43B | +6.0% | +18.8% |
| VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 83% | 0.1% | $1.73B | +6.6% | +21.0% |
| IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 44% | 0.19% | $82.97B | +14.5% | +19.3% |
| VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 43% | 0.07% | $17.95B | +15.4% | +21.2% |
| RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | 42% | 0.08% | $1.49B | +13.2% | — |
| BKSE BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF | 41% | 0.04% | $87.3M | +14.9% | +21.3% |
| XJR iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Small-Cap E… | 39% | 0.12% | $160.7M | +15.1% | +18.5% |
| BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity… | 39% | 0.09% | $696.0M | +13.5% | +22.6% |
Questions investors ask
Is IWO good for retirement?
IWO may suit a small, higher-risk part of a retirement portfolio rather than its core. It is volatile. It fell 57.6% in the 2008 financial crisis, 39.8% in the 2020 COVID crash and 34.4% in 2022, when it took 28 months to recover. Its yield was just 0.47% as of October 29, 2026, so it offers little income. Someone drawing from savings during a downturn could be forced to sell shares at low prices.
What's the difference between IWO and VTWG?
Mostly cost and size. Both follow the same small-company US growth strategy, and their holdings overlap by 83%. Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) charges 0.10% a year, compared with 0.24% for IWO. IWO is much larger. It had $15.4 billion in net assets as of June 30, 2026, against about $1.7 billion for VTWG as of August 31, 2026. Larger funds often trade with tighter spreads, the gap between buying and selling prices.
Does IWO pay dividends?
Yes, IWO pays dividends every quarter, but they are small. Over the 12 months to October 29, 2026, it paid $1.68 per share, a yield of 0.47%. The yield is low because fast-growing small companies tend to reinvest their profits in the business instead of paying them out to shareholders. Investors who need regular income from their savings often rely on other kinds of funds for it.
What are IWO's top holdings?
As of June 30, 2026, IWO's largest holdings were Moog (0.73%), BrightSpring Health Services (0.68%), MaxLinear (0.66%), Argan (0.66%) and JFrog (0.59%). No single stock dominates. The fund had 1,133 holdings, and the top 10 made up only about 6% of assets. As of March 31, 2026, healthcare, industrials and technology made up a significant portion of the index. The list changes as companies grow, shrink or lose their growth traits.
What's the difference between IWO and IWM?
IWM, also from iShares, covers the whole Russell 2000 Index of small US companies. IWO holds only the growth-oriented part, which was about 66% of the Russell 2000's market value as of March 31, 2026. IWM costs 0.19% a year, compared with 0.24% for IWO. In the year to October 29, 2026, IWM's price return was 16.2%, against 9.3% for IWO. Their holdings overlap by 44%.