At a glance
GXDW charges 0.5% a year, below the 0.86% average of the 7 funds most like it (the cheapest of 8). It has $6.4M in assets, the 8th largest of that group; it paid 1.45% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, semiannual. Over the past year it returned −10.8% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), the weakest of those 8 funds. Its ten largest positions make up 124.5% of the fund, out of 11 in all.
The short version
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW) is a fund of funds that tracks the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Thematic Rotation Total Return Index. It holds the five Global X thematic ETFs with the strongest relative performance and reviews them monthly. Instead of one theme, it shifts toward whichever themes are leading, and it charges 0.50% a year. It is tiny, with about $6.4 million in net assets as of August 31, 2026, and it lost 48.03% in 2022.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
GXDW -10.8% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXDW official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +3.58% | — | -10.06% | — | +0.47% |
| Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Thematic Rotation TM Total Return Index (TR) index, same period | — | -4.47% | — | -1.93% | — | -0.37% |
| GXDW price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +3.9% | -10.8% | — | — | — | +7.1% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, GXDW returned -10.8%, 8th of 8 among similar funds.
- The deepest fall in its price history was 26.3% (May 11, 2026 to Jul 29, 2026), not yet recovered.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +3.9% | — |
| 2025 | — | +3.58% |
| 2024 | — | -4.10% |
| 2023 | — | +10.34% |
| 2022 | — | -48.03% |
| 2021 | — | +3.30% |
| 2020 | — | +61.74% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Not in the price data, which starts Apr 1, 2025 |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Not in the price data, which starts Apr 1, 2025 |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.0800 |
What's inside
As of Aug 31, 2026, the fund held 11 securities; the ten largest made up 124.46% of assets.
| Fund held | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| GLOBAL X CYBERSECURITY ETF MUTUAL FUND | 21.19% | |
| GLOBAL X LITHIUM & BATTERY T MUTUAL FUND | 20.36% | |
| GLOBAL X ART INTEL & TECH MUTUAL FUND | 20.15% | |
| GLOBAL X HYDROGEN ETF MUTUAL FUND | 19.58% | |
| GLOBAL X INTERNET OF THINGS MUTUAL FUND | 18.70% | |
| CITADEL SECURITIES LLC RA | 6.00% | |
| DAIWA CAPITAL MARKETS AMERICA INC RA | 5.64% | |
| NOMURA SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL INC RA | 5.64% | |
| RBC DOMINION SECURITIES INC RA | 5.64% | |
| DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC RA | 1.54% | |
| NATWEST MARKETS SECURITIES INC RA | 1.07% |
By country
United States 125.53%By asset type
Stocks 99.98%RA 25.54%What changed recently
- Over the three months to Aug 31, 2026, investors withdrew a net $1.7M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +6.11%, -13.36%, -12.12%.
How it works
GXDW tracks the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Thematic Rotation Total Return Index. The index is built by Nasdaq, Inc., which is independent of the fund's adviser, Global X Management Company LLC. The index picks only from Global X thematic ETFs, ranging from cybersecurity and cloud computing to hydrogen and video games. Nasdaq ranks them with its Dorsey Wright Relative Strength Matrix. This is a momentum method: it compares how each fund's price has done against the others over various time periods.
At each month-end, the index picks the five top-ranked ETFs and weights them equally. Whenever one drops out and another joins, all five are reset to equal weights. The mix can change quickly. As of January 31, 2026, the index leaned toward the communication services and consumer discretionary sectors. On August 31, 2026, the fund held the Global X Cybersecurity, Lithium & Battery Tech, Artificial Intelligence & Technology, Hydrogen and Internet of Things ETFs, at roughly a fifth each.
The fund generally copies the index, holding the same ETFs in the same proportions. That means owners carry the risks of every company inside those funds. Portfolio turnover was 191.21%, according to its March 27, 2026 prospectus. In other words, it traded holdings worth nearly twice its average assets in a year, and those trading costs are not part of the expense ratio. The fund may also lend out up to one-third of its total assets.
What it really costs
- GXDW charges 0.5% a year, versus an average of 0.86% for the similar funds below (1st of 8, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $51 in the first year and $628 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXDW | $51 | $160 | $280 | $628 |
Structure and tax notes
- Invests in other funds rather than directly in stocks or bonds, so its holdings are those funds.
In a retirement portfolio
It holds just five thematic ETFs picked by momentum, and it swung from a 61.74% gain in 2020 to a 48.03% loss in 2022.
GXDW could add a rules-based tilt toward leading growth themes, but it comes with large swings. It launched in October 2019, so it has no 2008 record. Its prospectus shows a 61.74% gain in 2020, the year of the COVID crash. It lost 48.03% in 2022, its worst calendar year. Since April 1, 2025, its deepest drop was 26.3%, from May 11 to July 29, 2026, and it had not regained that high by October 27, 2026. Anyone drawing money in a year like 2022 would be cashing out shares at much lower prices.
Income is modest: the trailing 12-month yield was 1.45% as of October 27, 2026, paid twice a year. In the SEC's standard example, the 0.50% expense ratio adds up to $628 over 10 years on $10,000. Past results don't predict future returns, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors who want a rules-based, momentum-driven rotation among Global X thematic ETFs, such as cybersecurity, lithium and hydrogen, instead of picking themes themselves.
- Those who can live with big swings: it gained 61.74% in 2020, lost 48.03% in 2022, and fell 26.3% from May to July 2026.
- Investors using it as a small add-on to broad index funds who accept a 0.50% expense ratio plus trading costs from 191.21% turnover.
Look elsewhere if
- Retirees seeking steady income: the trailing 12-month yield was 1.45% as of October 27, 2026, paid only twice a year.
- Anyone wanting a steadier record: through December 31, 2025, it averaged 0.47% a year since launch and lost 10.06% a year over five years.
- Investors wary of tiny funds: net assets were about $6.4 million on August 31, 2026, with $1.7 million in net outflows over three months.
Close alternatives
Matched by other buffer (defined-outcome) funds, largest first.
| Fund | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXDW this fund | 0.5% | $6.4M | -10.8% | — |
| BUFR FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF | 0.95% | $10.49B | +11.6% | +16.8% |
| BUFD FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF | 0.95% | $2.04B | +9.5% | +13.9% |
| PJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - Ja… | 0.79% | $1.44B | +10.5% | +14.8% |
| PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - De… | 0.79% | $984.1M | +11.6% | +14.9% |
| FDEC FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - December | 0.85% | $1.31B | +12.9% | +18.5% |
| FJAN FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - January | 0.85% | $1.47B | +12.3% | +17.4% |
| FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer Fund - February | 0.85% | $1.42B | +12.9% | +18.6% |
Questions investors ask
What does GXDW invest in?
GXDW invests in other ETFs, not individual stocks. It tracks the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Thematic Rotation Total Return Index. That index holds the five Global X thematic ETFs with the strongest price performance compared with the others, weighted equally and reviewed monthly. As of August 31, 2026, they were the Global X Cybersecurity, Lithium & Battery Tech, Artificial Intelligence & Technology, Hydrogen and Internet of Things ETFs, each roughly 19% to 21% of net assets. The lineup changes when the rankings change.
Is GXDW good for retirement?
GXDW is built more as a small, higher-risk add-on than as a core retirement holding. It lost 48.03% in 2022. It also fell 26.3% from May 11 to July 29, 2026, and had not regained that high by October 27, 2026. Income is light: the trailing 12-month yield was 1.45% as of that date, paid twice a year. Anyone drawing cash during a slump like 2022 would be cashing out shares at much lower prices.
Does GXDW pay dividends?
Yes, GXDW pays distributions twice a year. In the 12 months to October 27, 2026, it paid about $0.36 per share, a trailing yield of 1.45%. Its payouts largely pass through income from the ETFs it holds. Those ETFs focus on growth themes such as cybersecurity, artificial intelligence and hydrogen, not high-dividend stocks. The fund can switch ETFs at each monthly review, so the amount it pays can vary from one payment to the next.
How has GXDW performed since it launched?
Through December 31, 2025, GXDW had roughly broken even since its October 25, 2019 launch, with big swings along the way. Its prospectus shows an average annual return of 0.47% since launch. Over five years it lost 10.06% a year, well behind its index's -1.93%. Calendar years ranged from a 61.74% gain in 2020 to a 48.03% loss in 2022. Based on price alone, it lost 10.8% in the 12 months to October 27, 2026.
What's the difference between GXDW and owning Global X thematic ETFs directly?
The main difference is who picks the themes. GXDW holds five Global X thematic ETFs and lets Nasdaq's monthly relative strength rankings decide which ones. It resets them to equal weights whenever the lineup changes. Owning the ETFs directly means choosing and rebalancing them yourself. GXDW charges a 0.50% expense ratio for this, or $51 in the first year on $10,000 in the SEC's standard example. Its rotation also led to portfolio turnover of 191.21%.