FDVV vs SCHD

FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETFvsSCHDSchwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Expense ratioNet assetsYield (TTM)Overlap1 yr5 yr*
FDVV0.15%$10.16B2.73%16%+13.6%+13.7%
SCHD0.06%$112.34B2.95%+38.9%+10.5%

Total returns with distributions reinvested; * a year. Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 · holdings and costs from SEC filings · page updated Nov 3, 2026

At a glance

16% of FDVV’s and SCHD’s holdings overlap by weight, with 23 securities in common out of 96 and 99. SCHD costs less: 0.06% a year against 0.15% for FDVV, or $60 against $150 on every $100,000. FDVV has $10.16B in assets and SCHD $112.34B; over the past 12 months FDVV paid out 2.73% of its price and SCHD 2.95%, both quarterly. Over the past year FDVV returned +13.6% and SCHD +38.9% with distributions reinvested; over five years, +13.7% and +10.5% a year. In the 2022 bear market FDVV fell 20.2% at its worst and SCHD 16.8%; FDVV was back at its earlier high 9 months after the low, SCHD 15 months.

Key differences

FDVVSCHD
FundFidelity High Dividend ETFSchwab US Dividend Equity ETF
IssuerFidelitySchwab
StructureOpen-end ETFOpen-end ETF
TypeHigh dividendDividend
LaunchedSep 12, 2016Oct 20, 2011
Expense ratio0.15%0.06%
Cost a year on $100,000$150$60
Net assets$10.16B$112.34B
Holdings9699
Ten largest positions33.8%41.7%
Yield (12 months)2.73%2.95%
Paysquarterlyquarterly
Portfolio turnover39% a year30% a year
Price data fromSep 15, 2016Oct 20, 2011

Holdings and overlap

Overlap by weight16%the share of each fund in holdings both own
Securities in common23FDVV 96 · SCHD 99 in all
Ten largest positions33.8% / 41.7%of assets, FDVV / SCHD

Overlap adds up, for every security both funds own, the smaller of its two weights: 100% would mean identical portfolios.

Largest holdings

HoldingFDVVSCHD
NVIDIA CORP6.57%—
APPLE INC6.18%—
MICROSOFT CORP4.89%—
Merck & Co Inc0.39%4.76%
Amgen Inc—4.70%
Abbott Laboratories—4.68%
COCA COLA CO1.96%4.16%
Chevron Corp—4.01%
Verizon Communications Inc0.13%3.96%
ConocoPhillips—3.93%
Home Depot Inc1.59%3.87%
Procter & Gamble Co1.69%3.82%

The biggest differences in weight: NVIDIA CORP (6.6% in FDVV, 0.0% in SCHD); APPLE INC (6.2% in FDVV, 0.0% in SCHD); MICROSOFT CORP (4.9% in FDVV, 0.0% in SCHD).

By sector

SectorFDVVSCHDDifference
Technology26.5%5.6%FDVV +20.9
Health care3.1%21.3%SCHD +18.2
Consumer staples9.7%17.7%SCHD +8.0
Financials13.5%5.2%FDVV +8.3
Energy0.0%12.7%SCHD +12.7
Industrials2.5%9.0%SCHD +6.5
Consumer discretionary8.9%7.2%FDVV +1.7
Utilities7.7%0.0%FDVV +7.7
Real estate6.0%0.0%FDVV +6.0
Communication services3.0%2.3%FDVV +0.7
Materials0.9%0.9%—
Sectors of the companies each fund holds that have a stock page here (81.9% of FDVV, 81.7% of SCHD). Source: N-PORT holdings reports as of Jul 31, 2026 (FDVV) and Aug 31, 2026 (SCHD).

Returns

$0$20K$40K20172019202120232025
FDVV SCHD · $10,000 in each on Sep 30, 2016, distributions reinvested.

$10,000 put into FDVV on Sep 30, 2016 was worth $35,053 on Oct 27, 2026, and in SCHD $35,544 (+13.3% and +13.4% a year). That is as far back as the price data for both goes.

1 yr3 yr5 yr10 yr
FDVV price data to Oct 27, 2026+13.6%+22.8%+13.7%+13.6%
FDVV official prospectus, to Nov 29, 2025+21.71%—+12.85%—
SCHD price data to Nov 2, 2026+38.9%+19.9%+10.5%+13.9%
SCHD official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2024+11.60%—+11.03%+11.03%
Multi-year figures are annualized total returns with distributions reinvested. "Official" rows are the SEC-standard returns from each fund's prospectus, to the end of the last calendar year; they reach back further where the price data starts late.

Calendar years

YearFDVVSCHDDifference
2026+12.8% *+34.1% *SCHD +21.3
2025+17.1%+4.3%FDVV +12.8
2024+21.8%+11.6%FDVV +10.2
2023+18.0%+4.6%FDVV +13.5
2022-4.2%-3.2%SCHD +0.9
2021+29.3%+29.9%SCHD +0.6
2020+2.9%+15.1%SCHD +12.2
2019+24.1%+27.3%SCHD +3.2
2018-1.2%-5.5%FDVV +4.3
2017+14.0%+20.9%SCHD +6.9
Total returns from price data; * year to Oct 27, 2026.

Downturns and recovery

FDVVSCHD
2008 financial crisis
stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009
Before it launchedBefore it launched
2020 COVID crash
stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020
−40.2% at the worst; back at its high 10 months after the low−32.8% at the worst; back at its high 5 months after the low
2022 bear market
stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022
−20.2% at the worst; back at its high 9 months after the low−16.8% at the worst; back at its high 15 months after the low
Worst fall in the price data−40.2% (Feb 14, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020)−33.4% (Jan 23, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020)
The deepest drop from a high to a low during each stretch when stocks fell, and how long the fund took to get back to its earlier high, with distributions reinvested. The price data starts Sep 15, 2016 for FDVV and Oct 20, 2011 for SCHD.

Income

FDVV yield (12 months)2.73%paid quarterly
SCHD yield (12 months)2.95%paid quarterly
YearFDVVSCHD
2025$328$384
2024$348$389
2023$426$351
2022$320$317
2021$343$351
2020$314$349
2019$469$368
2018$387$283
Distributions paid during each calendar year on $10,000 of shares bought at the previous year-end close, adjusted for share splits. Before taxes.

Costs

SCHD charges 0.06% a year and FDVV 0.15%: on $100,000 that is $90 a year less with SCHD ($450 on $500,000). The fee comes out of each fund's assets, so it is already in the returns above.

Cost of $10,000 (SEC example)1 yr3 yrs5 yrs10 yrs
FDVV$15$48$85$192
SCHD$6$19$34$77
From each fund's prospectus: the total costs on $10,000 invested, at a 5% yearly return, with the shares sold at the end of each period.
Picked a fund? Check the plan around it. ReadyAimRetire shows whether your savings, Social Security and spending hold up year by year, whichever funds you hold.
Test my plan →

Sources

  • FDVV: 485BPOS prospectus (risk/return XBRL), filed Nov 24, 2025 — SEC EDGAR
  • FDVV: N-PORT holdings report, filed Sep 23, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • SCHD: 485BPOS prospectus (risk/return XBRL), filed Dec 22, 2025 — SEC EDGAR
  • SCHD: N-PORT holdings report, filed Oct 27, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • Prices: daily prices and distributions through Oct 27, 2026

For education only, not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell either fund. Past performance does not predict future results.