At a glance
QLD charges 0.89% a year. It has $14.10B in assets; it paid 0.15% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%); over three years it returned +10.1% a year. At its worst it fell 51.7% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 61.2% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 3 months and 19 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 31.6% of the fund, out of 107 in all.
The short version
ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) aims to deliver twice the daily return of the Nasdaq-100 Index, before fees. It uses stocks plus derivatives such as swaps and futures to do this. It resets that leverage every day, so returns over months or years can stray far from 2x the index. Losses can be severe: it fell 83.2% from October 2007 to March 2009. It is less aggressive than its 3x sibling, TQQQ, and charges a 0.89% expense ratio.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
QLD +7.6% over the year to Nov 2, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +30.36% | — | +19.77% | +30.73% | — |
| QLD price data to Nov 2, 2026 | +14.2% | +7.6% | +10.1% | -1.2% | +23.1% | +20.0% |
- Over the year to Nov 2, 2026, QLD returned +7.6%.
- Its 5-year annualized return was -1.2% and its 10-year +23.1%.
- In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 51.7% and regained its old high 3.4 months after the low.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2008 (-72.9%); its best was 2009 (+121.2%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 83.2% (Oct 31, 2007 to Mar 9, 2009), recovered by Mar 19, 2012.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +14.2% | — |
| 2025 | -34.8% | +30.36% |
| 2024 | +42.6% | +42.82% |
| 2023 | +117.3% | +117.08% |
| 2022 | -60.6% | -60.49% |
| 2021 | +54.7% | +54.32% |
| 2020 | +88.9% | +89.03% |
| 2019 | +81.7% | +82.07% |
| 2018 | -8.3% | -8.39% |
| 2017 | +70.3% | +70.55% |
| 2016 | +10.2% | +10.01% |
| 2015 | +14.8% | — |
| 2014 | +37.6% | — |
| 2013 | +82.1% | — |
| 2012 | +34.8% | — |
| 2011 | +0.0% | — |
| 2010 | +36.9% | — |
| 2009 | +121.2% | — |
| 2008 | -72.9% | — |
| 2007 | +28.8% | — |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Lost 82.3% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 83.2%, back to its old high 36.3 months after the low |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Lost 51.5% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 51.7%, back to its old high 3.4 months after the low |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 61.2% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 61.2%, back to its old high 19.3 months after the low |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.1000 | |
| 2025 | $0.1150 | -17.9% |
| 2024 | $0.1400 | +7.7% |
| 2023 | $0.1300 | +136.4% |
| 2022 | $0.0550 | +2100.0% |
| 2020 | $0.0025 | -93.3% |
| 2019 | $0.0375 | +275.0% |
| 2018 | $0.0100 | +170.3% |
| 2017 | $0.0037 | -83.6% |
| 2016 | $0.0225 | +100.9% |
| 2015 | $0.0112 | -31.3% |
| 2014 | $0.0163 | +101.2% |
| 2013 | $0.0081 | +62.0% |
| 2012 | $0.0050 | +455.6% |
| 2008 | $0.0009 | -99.4% |
| 2007 | $0.1594 |
What's inside
As of Aug 31, 2026, most of the fund sat in cash, Treasury bills and money-market holdings (13.4% of net assets), with its exposure coming from 13 swap and futures positions rather than from owning the stocks outright.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. | 5.82% | |
| Apple, Inc. | 5.07% | |
| Microsoft Corp. | 4.10% | |
| Micron Technology, Inc. | 3.25% | |
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 3.04% | |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 2.31% | |
| Alphabet, Inc. Class A | 2.15% | |
| Tesla, Inc. | 2.00% | |
| Alphabet, Inc. Class C | 1.99% | |
| Broadcom, Inc. | 1.91% | |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 1.85% | |
| Walmart, Inc. | 1.54% | |
| Intel Corp. | 1.35% | |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | 1.31% | |
| Palantir Technologies, Inc. | 1.29% |
By country
United States 66.42%Ireland 1.24%Netherlands 0.9%Canada 0.66%United Kingdom 0.45%By asset type
Stocks 68.23%RA 1.61%What changed recently
- Over the three months to Aug 31, 2026, investors added a net $833.8M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: -1.58%, -13.60%, +7.87%.
How it works
QLD uses leverage, which means its market exposure is larger than the money investors put in. It aims for twice the daily move of the Nasdaq-100 Index. Nasdaq Inc. builds the index from the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq, including some based outside the US, and weights them by market value. The index's members are reviewed each December, and weights are adjusted in March, June and September. As of August 31, 2026, the fund's largest direct stock holdings were NVIDIA (5.8% of net assets), Apple (5.1%), Microsoft (4.1%), Micron Technology (3.2%) and Amazon (3.0%).
To reach 2x, ProShare Advisors pairs those stocks with derivatives, which are contracts whose value is tied to the index. Most are total return swaps, which are deals with large banks to exchange the index's return. The fund also uses futures. Spare cash goes into Treasury bills, repurchase agreements and a ProShares money market ETF. If a swap partner fails to pay, the fund could lose money.
The key mechanic is the daily reset. After the index rises, the fund adds exposure, and after it falls, the fund cuts back. Over longer periods, compounding (returns building on returns) pulls results away from 2x, often for the worse in choppy markets. The prospectus shows that if the index fell 20% over a year with 50% volatility (day-to-day swings), the fund could lose about 50%, not 40%. A one-day index drop near 50% could wipe out the investment.
What it really costs
- QLD charges 0.89% a year.
- Of that, 0.75% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
- The fee includes a 0.07% waiver from the adviser, which may end.
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $91 in the first year and $1,172 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | $91 | $299 | $524 | $1,172 |
Structure and tax notes
- Resets its exposure every day. Over periods longer than a day, compounding means returns can differ sharply from 2× the index — usually worse in choppy markets. Built for short-term trading, not buy-and-hold.
In a retirement portfolio
Its 2x leverage resets every day, so long-term results can stray far from twice the index, and its past losses have gone beyond 80%.
QLD magnifies Nasdaq-100 gains, and it magnifies the losses just as much. It lost 83.2% from October 2007 to March 2009 and did not recover until March 2012. Its worst calendar year was 2008, at -72.9%. It fell 51.7% in the 2020 COVID crash and recovered in about 3.4 months. In the 2022 bear market it fell 61.2% and did not regain its peak until May 2024. Anyone who has to draw cash from it in a year like that would lock in heavy losses. It offers little income: the trailing yield was 0.14% as of October 29, 2026, paid quarterly. Costs are high. In the SEC's standard example, a $10,000 investment costs $91 over one year and $1,172 over 10 years. Past results don't predict future returns, and a retirement plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Experienced traders who want twice the Nasdaq-100's daily move for short periods, check their positions often and understand the daily reset.
- Investors comfortable with a tech-heavy mix led by NVIDIA, Apple and Microsoft, and with drops like the 61.2% fall in 2022.
- Traders who want leveraged Nasdaq-100 exposure that is less extreme than the 3x ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ).
Look elsewhere if
- Retirees who may need cash in a downturn. QLD fell 83.2% from 2007 to 2009 and took three more years to recover.
- Income seekers. The trailing yield was just 0.14% as of October 29, 2026.
- Long-term investors focused on cost. The expense ratio is 0.89%, and the daily reset can erode returns in choppy markets.
Close alternatives
Matched by leveraged/inverse funds on the same index (nasdaq-100), same direction.
| Fund | Exposure | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD this fund | 2× | 0.89% | $14.10B | +7.6% | +10.1% |
| TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 3× | — | $19.60B | +2.7% | +19.3% |
Questions investors ask
Is QLD good for long-term investing?
It isn't built for it. QLD aims for twice the Nasdaq-100's return over a single day, and its prospectus warns that results over longer periods can differ significantly from 2x. Some long stretches have still paid off: the fund's average annual return was 30.73% over the 10 years to December 31, 2025. But it also fell 83.2% from October 2007 to March 2009 and 61.2% in 2022. Holding it for years means accepting swings like those.
What's the difference between QLD and TQQQ?
Both are ProShares funds that reset daily against the Nasdaq-100 Index. QLD targets 2x the daily return, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) targets 3x. More leverage magnifies both gains and losses. As of October 29, 2026, TQQQ returned 15.7% over one year versus 16.3% for QLD. Over three years, TQQQ returned 31.9% a year versus 17.7% for QLD. Neither is designed for steady long-term holding.
Does QLD pay dividends?
Yes, but very little. QLD pays distributions quarterly. They totaled $0.12 per share over the 12 months to October 29, 2026, a yield of 0.14%. Income is not the point of this fund. Its return depends on the Nasdaq-100's price moves, doubled each day, minus fees and financing costs. Anyone looking for steady retirement income would get little from it.
What is QLD's expense ratio?
QLD's expense ratio is 0.89%, according to its prospectus filed September 25, 2026. That includes a 0.75% management fee. In the SEC's standard example, $10,000 invested with a 5% annual return would cost about $91 over one year, $299 over three years, $524 over five years and $1,172 over 10 years. The fund also pays trading and financing costs on its swaps and futures. The prospectus says these costs make it harder to hit the 2x target.
Can you lose all your money in QLD?
Yes. The prospectus warns that if the Nasdaq-100 approaches a 50% loss at any point in a day, you could lose your entire investment, because 2x leverage doubles that loss. Losses over longer periods have already been severe. The fund fell 83.2% from its October 2007 peak to March 2009 and did not recover until March 2012. Leverage also exposes the fund to swap counterparties, the banks on the other side of its contracts, which could fail to pay.