At a glance
QID charges 0.95% a year, the same as the average of the 2 funds most like it. It has $272.4M in assets, the 3rd largest of that group; it paid 6.06% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned −26.0% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 2nd of those 3 funds; over three years it returned −39.8% a year. At its worst it fell 18.9% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 35.8% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high within a month and 2 months after the lows.
The short version
ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) aims to return twice the opposite of the Nasdaq-100 Index's move each day. It uses swaps and futures instead of owning stocks. It is built for short-term bets against large, tech-heavy Nasdaq companies, not for holding. Because its exposure resets daily, its price fell about 99% over the 10 years to October 27, 2026. Its 0.95% expense ratio matches the average of similar funds.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
QID -26.0% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QID official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | -35.00% | — | -30.00% | -36.64% | — |
| QID price data to Oct 27, 2026 | -29.3% | -26.0% | -39.8% | -28.1% | -37.5% | -34.6% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, QID returned -26.0%, 2nd of 3 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was -28.1% and its 10-year -37.5%.
- In the 2020 COVID crash, while stocks fell, it gained 59.8%.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2020 (-69.7%); its best was 2008 (+77.0%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 100% (Nov 20, 2008 to Oct 6, 2026), not yet recovered.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | -29.3% | — |
| 2025 | -35.0% | -35.00% |
| 2024 | -34.0% | -34.02% |
| 2023 | -57.2% | -57.25% |
| 2022 | +66.3% | +66.17% |
| 2021 | -44.9% | -44.84% |
| 2020 | -69.7% | -69.68% |
| 2019 | -49.6% | -49.68% |
| 2018 | -9.2% | -9.91% |
| 2017 | -43.8% | -44.03% |
| 2016 | -19.4% | -19.36% |
| 2015 | -24.8% | — |
| 2014 | -34.2% | — |
| 2013 | -49.4% | — |
| 2012 | -34.3% | — |
| 2011 | -22.4% | — |
| 2010 | -38.9% | — |
| 2009 | -66.8% | — |
| 2008 | +77.0% | — |
| 2007 | -27.3% | — |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Gained 133.7% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 42.5%, not recovered by the end of the data |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Gained 59.8% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 18.9%, back to its old high 0.1 months after the low |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Gained 83.8% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 35.8%, back to its old high 2 months after the low |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.4700 | |
| 2025 | $1.2700 | -51.5% |
| 2024 | $2.6200 | -12.7% |
| 2023 | $3.0000 | +1400.0% |
| 2022 | $0.2000 | -85.7% |
| 2020 | $1.4000 | -88.3% |
| 2019 | $12.0000 | -38.8% |
| 2018 | $19.6000 | +390.0% |
| 2017 | $4.0000 | -100.0% |
| 2008 | $16112.0000 | +465.7% |
| 2007 | $2848.0000 |
What's inside
As of Aug 31, 2026, most of the fund sat in cash, Treasury bills and money-market holdings (119.59% of net assets), with its inverse exposure coming from 11 swap and futures positions rather than from owning the stocks outright.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Repurchase Agreement RA | 5.67% | |
| Repurchase Agreement RA | 3.77% | |
| Repurchase Agreement RA | 2.26% | |
| Repurchase Agreement RA | 1.21% | |
| Repurchase Agreement RA | 0.75% |
By country
United States 13.67%By asset type
RA 13.67%What changed recently
- Over the three months to Aug 31, 2026, investors added a net $17.7M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: -1.37%, +14.08%, -7.88%.
How it works
QID follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, which Nasdaq Inc. builds and maintains. The index holds the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq-affiliated exchanges, including some non-US companies, and weights them by market value (market capitalization). Nasdaq reviews the list every December and adjusts weights in March, June and September. The fund does not own these stocks. Instead, it uses derivatives, which are contracts whose value comes from something else. These are mainly swap agreements with major global financial institutions and Nasdaq-100 futures contracts. Spare cash goes into Treasury bills, repurchase agreements and a ProShares money market ETF. As of August 31, 2026, its reported holdings were repurchase agreements, total return swaps and Nasdaq-100 E-mini futures.
The target is -2x the index for a single day only, measured from one net asset value calculation to the next. Each day ProShare Advisors rebalances. When the index rises, the fund shrinks its short exposure. When the index falls, it adds more. Because of this daily reset, returns over weeks or years can drift far from -2x the index, and they are often worse when markets swing back and forth. The prospectus warns that if the index nears a 50% gain within one day, holders could lose their entire investment. Swap partners that fail to pay can also cause losses.
What it really costs
- QID charges 0.95% a year, versus an average of 0.95% for the similar funds below.
- Of that, 0.75% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
- The fee includes a 0.04% waiver from the adviser, which may end.
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $97 in the first year and $1,209 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QID | $97 | $311 | $543 | $1,209 |
Structure and tax notes
- Resets its inverse exposure every day. Over periods longer than a day, compounding means returns can differ sharply from -2× the index — usually worse in choppy markets. Built for short-term trading, not buy-and-hold.
In a retirement portfolio
Its daily reset and -2x inverse exposure have wiped out almost all of its value over long periods, which makes it a tool for short bets rather than long holding.
QID has jumped during market crashes. It gained 133.7% from the market's October 2007 peak to its March 2009 low, 59.8% in the 2020 COVID crash and 83.8% in the 2022 bear market. But those gains came in short bursts. In rising markets the losses were deep. Its worst calendar year was 2020, when it fell 69.7%. From a November 2008 peak through October 6, 2026, its price lost nearly 100% and never recovered. A retiree holding it as a long-term hedge who needed to sell shares would most likely have sold at a small fraction of the purchase price. The trailing yield was 6.06% as of October 27, 2026, paid quarterly, but that has not made up for the price losses. Annual costs are 0.95%. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Active traders who want a one-day bet, at twice the size, that the Nasdaq-100 will fall, and who check their positions daily.
- Experienced investors who want a brief hedge against a sharp drop in large Nasdaq tech stocks without shorting shares or using margin themselves.
- Traders who find SQQQ's -3x exposure too aggressive but want more than PSQ's -1x, at PSQ's same 0.95% expense ratio.
Look elsewhere if
- Long-term holders and retirees: QID's price fell about 99% over the 10 years to October 27, 2026, because of the daily reset.
- Income seekers: the 6.06% trailing yield as of October 27, 2026, came alongside a 29.3% price drop over the year to that date.
- Anyone uncomfortable with swap counterparty risk, or with possibly losing everything if the Nasdaq-100 nears a 50% gain in one day.
Close alternatives
Matched by leveraged/inverse funds on the same index (nasdaq-100), same direction.
Net assets from each fund's latest N-PORT or annual report where available. Returns through Oct 27, 2026.Questions investors ask
Can you hold QID long term?
It isn't designed for that. QID targets -2x the Nasdaq-100 for one day at a time, and the daily reset compounds over longer periods. Its average annual return was -36.64% over the 10 years to December 31, 2025. Its price fell about 99% over the 10 years to October 27, 2026. Even with strong years like 2022, when it gained 66.17%, a long-term holder lost nearly everything.
What's the difference between QID and SQQQ?
Both are ProShares funds that bet against the Nasdaq-100, but SQQQ targets -3x the index's daily move while QID targets -2x. SQQQ is much larger, with about $2.5 billion in assets compared with QID's $272.4 million as of August 31, 2026. Over the year to October 27, 2026, SQQQ returned -40.6% and QID -26%. PSQ, the -1x version, returned -10.9% over the same period.
Does QID pay dividends?
Yes. QID pays distributions quarterly. Over the 12 months to October 27, 2026, it paid $0.84 per share, a trailing yield of 6.06%. The fund holds no stocks, so these payouts generally reflect interest earned on its cash, Treasury bills and repurchase agreements. The income has been small compared with the price losses. The share price fell 29.3% over the year to October 27, 2026.
What is QID's expense ratio?
QID's expense ratio is 0.95%, which includes a 0.75% management fee, according to the prospectus filed September 25, 2026. That matches PSQ and the average of similar funds. Under the SEC's standard example, $10,000 earning 5% a year would cost about $97 in one year, $311 over three years, $543 over five and $1,209 over ten. Financing and trading costs for swaps and futures reduce returns further.
Can QID go to zero?
Yes, it can. The prospectus warns that if the Nasdaq-100 nears a 50% gain at any point in a single day, investors could lose their entire investment. Over longer periods, steady losses have nearly done the same thing. From a November 2008 peak through October 6, 2026, QID's price lost close to 100% and never recovered. Its worst calendar year was 2020, when it fell 69.68%.