At a glance
QABA charges 0.6% a year, above the 0.38% average of the 5 funds most like it (the 5th cheapest of 6). It has $87.5M in assets, the 6th largest of that group; it paid 2.3% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned +24.9% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 2nd of those 6 funds; over three years it returned +24.1% a year. At its worst it fell 42.8% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 23.1% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 10 months and 29 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 25.9% of the fund, out of 161 in all.
The short version
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) tracks an index of smaller US community banks listed on Nasdaq. Nasdaq and the American Bankers Association built the index, and it leaves out the 50 largest banks. That makes QABA a narrower bet on local lenders than broad bank funds. It also costs more: 0.60% a year, compared with 0.35% for SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE).
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
QABA +24.9% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QABA official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +4.52% | — | +7.41% | +6.13% | +8.55% |
| QABA price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +20.1% | +24.9% | +24.1% | +5.7% | +7.3% | +9.3% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, QABA returned +24.9%, 2nd of 6 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was +5.7% and its 10-year +7.3%.
- In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 42.8% and regained its old high 9.5 months after the low.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2018 (-16.5%); its best was 2013 (+43.5%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 49.3% (Jun 8, 2018 to Mar 23, 2020), recovered by Feb 24, 2021.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +20.1% | — |
| 2025 | +4.6% | +4.52% |
| 2024 | +14.5% | +14.51% |
| 2023 | -2.2% | -2.44% |
| 2022 | -9.0% | -8.70% |
| 2021 | +34.2% | +34.08% |
| 2020 | -10.8% | -11.00% |
| 2019 | +22.8% | +22.80% |
| 2018 | -16.5% | -16.14% |
| 2017 | +0.8% | +0.55% |
| 2016 | +37.4% | +37.57% |
| 2015 | +7.6% | — |
| 2014 | +2.8% | — |
| 2013 | +43.5% | — |
| 2012 | +13.5% | — |
| 2011 | -6.8% | — |
| 2010 | +13.1% | — |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Lost 42.4% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 42.8%, back to its old high 9.5 months after the low |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 12% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 23.1%, back to its old high 28.7 months after the low |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $1.0500 | |
| 2025 | $1.4300 | +8.3% |
| 2024 | $1.3200 | -2.9% |
| 2023 | $1.3600 | +22.5% |
| 2022 | $1.1100 | +12.1% |
| 2021 | $0.9900 | -13.9% |
| 2020 | $1.1500 | +15.0% |
| 2019 | $1.0000 | +22.0% |
| 2018 | $0.8200 | +9.3% |
| 2017 | $0.7500 | +27.1% |
| 2016 | $0.5900 | +9.3% |
| 2015 | $0.5400 | +14.9% |
| 2014 | $0.4700 | +27.0% |
| 2013 | $0.3700 | -27.5% |
| 2012 | $0.5100 | +34.2% |
| 2011 | $0.3800 | +26.7% |
| 2010 | $0.3000 |
What's inside
As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 161 securities; the ten largest made up 25.94% of assets.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORP | 4.37% | |
| COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (MO) | 3.39% | |
| CENTRAL BANCOMPANY INC | 2.93% | |
| UNITED BANKSHARES INC | 2.54% | |
| HANCOCK WHITNEY CORP | 2.44% | |
| BANK OZK | 2.29% | |
| EASTERN BANKSHARES INC | 2.07% | |
| TFS FINANCIAL CORP | 2.00% | |
| FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES INC (TEXAS) | 2.00% | |
| INTERNATIONAL BANCSHARES CORP | 1.90% | |
| FULTON FINANCIAL CORP | 1.86% | |
| TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC | 1.82% | |
| CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP | 1.67% | |
| INDEPENDENT BANK CORP (MASSACHUSETTS) | 1.63% | |
| WSFS FINANCIAL CORP | 1.61% |
By country
United States 99.85%Canada 0.3%By asset type
Stocks 99.91%RA 0.25%What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors added a net $3.2M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +5.92%, +1.10%, +8.48%.
How it works
QABA aims to match the Nasdaq OMX ABA Community Bank Index, before fees. Nasdaq and the American Bankers Association (ABA) developed the index and own it jointly. The fund normally keeps at least 90% of its net assets in the index's stocks. The starting pool is banks, thrifts (savings institutions) and their holding companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market. The index then removes the 50 largest banks by asset size, using FDIC call reports, which are the financial filings banks send to regulators. It also removes banks that focus on international business or credit cards. The stocks that remain must pass size and trading tests. As of March 31, 2026, the index held 149 securities.
Holdings are weighted by market capitalization, meaning a company's total stock market value, with caps on the largest. If one stock goes above 25%, or stocks above 5% together go above 50%, the biggest are trimmed to 8% and the rest to 4%. The extra weight is spread across the other stocks. As of June 30, 2026, the largest holding, Wintrust Financial, was about 4.4%.
The index is rebalanced every quarter and fully reviewed twice a year, and the fund makes the same changes shortly after. The April 30, 2026 prospectus lists portfolio turnover of 20%. The fund simply owns the shares. It uses no leverage, options or swaps.
What it really costs
- QABA charges 0.6% a year, versus an average of 0.38% for the similar funds below (5th of 6, cheapest first).
- Of that, 0.4% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
- The fee includes a 0.03% waiver from the adviser, which may end.
In a retirement portfolio
QABA holds a single industry, small community banks, and has had steep, slow-to-recover losses, so it fits better as a small side position than as a foundation.
QABA gives a targeted position in small and midsize US banks. As of October 27, 2026, its trailing yield was 2.3%, paid quarterly. Its 0.60% cost is well above the 0.38% average of similar funds. Downturns have been harsh. The fund fell 42.8% in the 2020 COVID crash and took about 9.5 months to recover. In 2022 it dropped 23.1% and needed about 29 months to recover. Its deepest decline was 49.3%, from June 2018 to March 2020, and it didn't fully recover until February 2021. Its worst calendar year was 2018, at −16.1%. Someone who has to sell shares for spending money in a bad year could lock in large losses. The fund launched in 2009, so it has no 2008 record. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors wanting a targeted position in smaller Nasdaq-listed community banks, with the 50 largest US banks left out by design.
- People who like quarterly dividends from bank stocks; the trailing yield was 2.3% as of October 27, 2026.
- Holders who can sit through deep drops without selling, such as the 42.8% fall in early 2020.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-focused investors: the 0.60% expense ratio compares with 0.35% for KRE and KBE and 0.40% for IAT.
- Anyone seeking diversification: almost every holding is a US bank, so trouble in one industry hits the whole fund.
- Investors who prefer large funds: with $87.5 million in net assets as of June 30, 2026, it is the smallest of its peers.
Close alternatives
Matched by closest holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports (no similar fund shares 20% or more of its holdings).
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QABA this fund | — | 0.6% | $87.5M | +24.9% | +24.1% |
| KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 45% | 0.35% | $4.74B | +21.5% | +26.5% |
| KBE SPDR S&P Bank ETF | 33% | 0.35% | $1.48B | +17.1% | +27.2% |
| SVAL iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 11% | 0.2% | $198.4M | +30.9% | +22.5% |
| FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF | 8% | 0.6% | $301.8M | +16.8% | +30.8% |
| IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 6% | 0.4% | $656.0M | +22.9% | +28.5% |
Questions investors ask
What's the difference between QABA and KRE?
Both own US bank stocks, but they track different indexes. QABA follows the Nasdaq OMX ABA Community Bank Index, which covers Nasdaq-listed banks and leaves out the 50 largest. KRE, the SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF, focuses on regional banks more broadly. KRE costs 0.35% a year, compared with 0.60% for QABA. It is also far larger, with about $4.7 billion in net assets as of June 30, 2026, against $87.5 million for QABA. Over the year to October 27, 2026, QABA returned 24.9% and KRE returned 21.5%.
Does QABA pay monthly dividends?
No. QABA pays dividends quarterly. In the 12 months to October 27, 2026, it paid $1.54 per share, a trailing yield of 2.3%. The payouts come from the dividends of the banks the fund owns. They can go up or down as those banks' profits and dividend decisions change, so the income isn't fixed.
What is QABA's expense ratio?
QABA's expense ratio is 0.60% a year, according to its prospectus filed April 30, 2026. That is above the 0.38% average of similar funds. KRE and KBE charge 0.35%, IAT charges 0.40% and SVAL charges 0.20%. Only First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO), from the same issuer, also charges 0.60%. Among six comparable funds, QABA ranks fifth on cost.
What are QABA's top holdings?
As of June 30, 2026, QABA's largest holdings were Wintrust Financial (4.4%), Commerce Bancshares (3.4%), Central Bancompany (2.9%), United Bankshares (2.5%) and Hancock Whitney (2.4%). The fund held 161 stocks. The top 10 made up about 26% of assets, so no single bank dominates. Nearly all holdings were US companies, and cash was less than 0.1%.
Is QABA a risky ETF?
Yes, it can be. QABA holds a single industry, so problems in banking affect the whole fund. Its worst quarter was a 36.3% loss in the first three months of 2020. Its deepest decline was 49.3%, from June 2018 to March 2020. In 2022 it fell 23.1% and took about 29 months to recover. As of October 27, 2026, its three-year volatility, a measure of how much returns swing, was 25.6%.