At a glance
PSIL charges 1.0% a year, above the 0.27% average of the 6 funds most like it (the most expensive of 7). It has $44.4M in assets, the 7th largest of that group; it paid 7.99% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, annual. Over the past year it returned +14.2% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), the weakest of those 7 funds; over three years it returned +19.1% a year. At its worst it fell 58.5% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and is still below its earlier high. Its ten largest positions make up 69.2% of the fund, out of 30 in all.
The short version
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) is a stock-picking fund rather than an index tracker. It holds mostly smaller companies working on psychedelic medicines, and as of June 30, 2026, its largest holdings were Definium Therapeutics, Compass Pathways and AtaiBeckley. Its 1.00% expense ratio is well above the 0.27% average of six broad health care ETFs, and its swings have been extreme: it fell 92.6% from September 2021 to October 2024.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
PSIL +14.2% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSIL official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +73.43% | — | — | — | -31.25% |
| S&P 500 Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes) index, same period | — | +17.88% | — | — | — | +12.01% |
| PSIL price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +22.4% | +14.2% | +19.1% | -22.6% | — | -23.8% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, PSIL returned +14.2%, 7th of 7 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was -22.6%.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2022 (-67.3%); its best was 2025 (+74.0%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 92.6% (Sep 22, 2021 to Oct 11, 2024), not yet recovered.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +22.4% | — |
| 2025 | +74.0% | +73.43% |
| 2024 | -19.5% | -19.44% |
| 2023 | -24.0% | -24.49% |
| 2022 | -67.3% | -66.01% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Before this security existed |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 54.5% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 58.5%, not recovered by the end of the data |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.8700 | +1068.8% |
| 2024 | $0.1600 | -46.7% |
| 2023 | $0.3000 | -40.0% |
| 2022 | $0.5000 |
What's inside
As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 30 securities; the ten largest made up 69.23% of assets, and 7.07% sat in cash and money-market holdings.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| DEFINIUM THERAPEUTICS INC | 12.85% | |
| COMPASS PATHWAYS PLC | 11.45% | |
| ATAIBECKLEY INC | 10.47% | |
| RELMADA THERAPEUTICS INC | 6.84% | |
| NRX PHARMACEUTICALS INC | 6.07% | |
| NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES INC | 4.38% | |
| CYBIN INC | 4.35% | |
| GH RESEARCH PLC | 4.31% | |
| ALKERMES PLC | 4.30% | |
| ALTO NEUROSCIENCE INC | 4.20% | |
| ABBVIE INC | 4.14% | |
| BRIGHT MINDS BIOSCIENCES INC | 3.84% | |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 3.61% | |
| SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS INC | 2.89% | |
| NEUPHORIA THERAPEUTICS INC | 2.49% |
By country
United States 50.67%Canada 25.2%United Kingdom 11.45%Ireland 8.61%By asset type
Stocks 95.93%What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors added a net $14.5M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +16.74%, +8.20%, +9.78%.
How it works
PSIL does not track an index. Its adviser, AdvisorShares, picks the stocks. Under normal conditions, at least 80% of net assets go to companies that earn at least half their net revenue from psychedelic drugs or devote at least half their assets to them. Derivatives that behave like those stocks also count toward the 80%. Eligible companies include drug developers, distributors and clinics offering psychedelic-assisted therapy. Cannabis does not count. The fund owns these companies only where national and local laws allow.
The prospectus gives the manager wide latitude. It looks for companies with dominant market positions or unusual room to grow. It uses outside analyst ratings and stock-rating tools, and it may own lesser-known or out-of-favor stocks it sees as underpriced. It sells when a stock looks overvalued, when a better opportunity appears, or to keep a position from growing too large. The prospectus describes no fixed weighting formula or rebalancing schedule. Portfolio turnover was 64%.
The fund is non-diversified, so it can put more money into a single company than a diversified fund can. It also concentrates more than 25% of assets in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. It may use total return swaps, which are contracts in which a bank pays the fund a stock's return. Swaps add the risk that the bank fails to pay. The fund held no derivatives as of June 30, 2026.
What it really costs
- PSIL charges 1% a year, versus an average of 0.27% for the similar funds below (7th of 7, cheapest first).
- Of that, 0.6% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
- The fee includes a 0.28% waiver from the adviser, which may end.
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $102 in the first year and $1,521 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSIL | $102 | $378 | $675 | $1,521 |
In a retirement portfolio
It is a narrow, actively managed bet on psychedelic drug developers that has lost as much as 92.6% from a peak, so it can play only a small, high-risk side role next to broader holdings.
PSIL launched in September 2021, so it missed the 2008 and 2020 crashes. In the 2022 bear market it fell 58.5% from January 3 to May 11, and it lost 66.01% over calendar 2022, its worst year. Its deepest drop was 92.6%, from September 2021 to October 2024, and it had not regained that peak as of October 27, 2026. Anyone who must sell shares or draw income in a bad year could lock in losses of that size.
Its yield over the past year was 7.99% as of October 27, 2026, paid in a single annual distribution, and one year's payout may not repeat. Costs are high: under the SEC's standard example, the 1.00% expense ratio comes to $102 in the first year and $1,521 over 10 years on $10,000. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors who want a small, deliberate stake in psychedelic drug research, with Definium Therapeutics, Compass Pathways and AtaiBeckley as the largest positions.
- People who can hold through drops like its 92.6% fall from 2021 to 2024 without needing to sell.
- Those who prefer a manager picking niche stocks, with about half in US companies and a quarter in Canadian ones, over a fixed index.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-focused investors: its 1.00% expense ratio compares with 0.08% for XLV and 0.09% for VHT.
- Anyone seeking steady income: it pays once a year, and its objective is growth, not income.
- Retirees who may need to sell in a downturn: it lost 66.01% in 2022 and had not regained its 2021 peak by October 27, 2026.
Close alternatives
Matched by closest holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports (no similar fund shares 20% or more of its holdings).
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSIL this fund | — | 1% | $44.4M | +14.2% | +19.1% |
| FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 8% | 0.084% | $3.29B | +23.8% | +16.0% |
| VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 8% | 0.09% | $22.04B | +28.9% | +16.9% |
| IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 8% | 0.39% | $3.56B | +23.8% | +15.0% |
| FBT First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index F… | 8% | 0.56% | $2.81B | +43.6% | +27.7% |
| XLV Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund | 8% | 0.08% | $40.60B | +30.2% | +16.2% |
| IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF | 8% | 0.41% | $3.84B | +19.5% | +13.4% |
Questions investors ask
What stocks are in PSIL?
As of June 30, 2026, PSIL's largest holdings were Definium Therapeutics (12.9%), Compass Pathways (11.5%), AtaiBeckley (10.5%), Relmada Therapeutics (6.8%) and NRx Pharmaceuticals (6.1%). The fund held 30 companies, and the top 10 made up 69.2% of assets. It also owned larger drugmakers such as Neurocrine Biosciences, AbbVie and Johnson & Johnson, each at about 4% or less. About half the portfolio was in US companies and a quarter in Canadian ones.
Is PSIL a good long-term investment?
Its long-term record has been poor so far, with sharp swings in both directions. From its September 2021 launch through December 31, 2025, the fund returned an average of -31.25% a year, versus 12.01% a year for the S&P 500. It lost 66.01% in 2022 and gained 73.43% in 2025. Its deepest drop was 92.6%. Results depend heavily on a small group of drug developers whose trial results and regulatory approvals are uncertain.
Does PSIL pay a dividend?
Yes, PSIL makes one payment a year. It paid $1.68 per share over the 12 months to October 27, 2026, a trailing yield of 7.99%. The fund's goal is long-term growth, not income, so that payout may not repeat and could vary widely. Most of its holdings are growth-stage drug companies. As the prospectus notes, growth stocks often pay little in dividends, so they have less of the cushion dividends can give in a falling market.
PSIL vs XLV: what's the difference?
They are very different funds. XLV, the Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund, holds large US health care companies, costs 0.08% a year and had about $40.6 billion in assets as of June 30, 2026. PSIL is actively managed, focuses on psychedelic drug developers, costs 1.00% and had about $44.4 million. The two shared only about 8% of their holdings. PSIL's one-year price return was 14.2% as of October 27, 2026, versus 30.2% for XLV as of October 30, 2026.
What is PSIL's expense ratio?
PSIL's expense ratio is 1.00%, according to its prospectus filed October 28, 2026. That figure includes a 0.60% management fee and reflects a 0.28% fee waiver. It was the most expensive of the seven funds compared, whose average was 0.27%. The SEC's standard example assumes $10,000 invested and a 5% annual return. On that basis, costs total about $102 after one year, $378 after three, $675 after five and $1,521 after 10 years.