At a glance
MEDX charges 0.85% a year, above the 0.33% average of the 8 funds most like it (the most expensive of 9). It has $19.1M in assets, the 8th largest of that group; it paid 1.11% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, annual. Over the past year it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 8th of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +13.9% a year. Its ten largest positions make up 67.1% of the fund, out of 32 in all.
The short version
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) is an actively managed fund for investors who want a manager, not an index, to pick drug, biotech and medical technology stocks, with an emphasis on cancer research. It is concentrated, with Eli Lilly at about 18% of assets as of June 30, 2026. Its 0.85% annual expense ratio is higher than all eight similar health care funds we compared, which average 0.33%.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
MEDX +19.1% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDX official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +28.45% | — | +5.80% | +5.67% | +8.47% |
| MEDX price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +11.1% | +19.1% | +13.9% | — | — | +6.8% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, MEDX returned +19.1%, 8th of 9 among similar funds.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2024 (-4.7%); its best was 2025 (+28.6%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 23.1% (Aug 30, 2024 to Apr 10, 2025), recovered by Oct 1, 2025.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +11.1% | — |
| 2025 | +28.6% | +28.45% |
| 2024 | -4.7% | -4.72% |
| 2023 | — | -6.03% |
| 2022 | — | +4.21% |
| 2021 | — | +10.59% |
| 2020 | — | +9.04% |
| 2019 | — | +16.04% |
| 2018 | — | +1.67% |
| 2017 | — | +10.71% |
| 2016 | — | -8.01% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Before this security existed |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Before this security existed |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $0.4100 | -18.0% |
| 2024 | $0.5000 |
What's inside
As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 32 securities; the ten largest made up 67.13% of assets, and 9.19% sat in cash and money-market holdings.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Eli Lilly & Co | 18.46% | |
| AbbVie Inc | 8.85% | |
| Novartis AG | 6.89% | |
| Johnson & Johnson | 5.59% | |
| Alkermes PLC | 5.53% | |
| AstraZeneca PLC | 4.98% | |
| Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc | 4.53% | |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co | 4.42% | |
| Merck & Co Inc | 3.96% | |
| Amgen Inc | 3.91% | |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc | 3.42% | |
| Biogen Inc | 3.09% | |
| Pfizer Inc | 2.86% | |
| GSK PLC | 2.71% | |
| CRISPR Therapeutics AG | 2.64% |
By country
United States 68.21%Switzerland 10.33%United Kingdom 8.57%Ireland 5.53%By asset type
Stocks 92.64%By sector
Sectors of the companies held, for the 53.8% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jun 30, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors withdrew a net $862K (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: -1.99%, +5.00%, +7.01%.
How it works
MEDX does not track an index. Its adviser, Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC, normally keeps at least 80% of net assets in stocks and similar securities of US and foreign companies in medical research, pharmaceuticals and medical technology. Qualifying firms earn at least half their revenue from that work. The manager looks for heavy investment in research on cancer and other diseases, then reviews balance sheets, revenue, earnings and dividends. Firms of any size qualify.
The prospectus sets no weighting formula or rebalancing schedule, so position sizes are the manager's call. The adviser generally exits a holding once it reaches adequate value, the business deteriorates or a more attractive opportunity appears. As of June 30, 2026, the fund had 32 holdings. The top 10 made up 67% of assets, and Eli Lilly alone was 18.5%. Reported portfolio turnover was 0%, a sign of very little trading.
Being non-diversified, MEDX can hold large stakes in a few companies. The prospectus allows up to 20% in junk bonds (debt rated below investment grade). It may use options, take long or short positions in leveraged or inverse ETFs, lend up to a third of its securities to earn extra return, and move up to 100% into cash-like holdings in adverse markets. As of June 30, 2026, it held no derivatives and about 9% cash.
What it really costs
- MEDX charges 0.85% a year, versus an average of 0.33% for the similar funds below (9th of 9, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $87 in the first year and $1,049 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDX | $87 | $271 | $471 | $1,049 |
In a retirement portfolio
It is a concentrated, actively managed fund of drug and biotech stocks, with about 18% in Eli Lilly as of June 30, 2026, so it fits better as a small side position than as a foundation.
MEDX could add a manager-picked drug and biotech tilt. Its prospectus record goes back before the ETF's January 2023 launch. It shows full-year gains of 9.04% in 2020, the COVID crash year, and 4.21% in the 2022 bear market, but no 2008 figure. Its worst year in that record was 2016, down 8.01%. Since launch, its deepest drop was 23.1%, from August 30, 2024 to April 10, 2025. It recovered by October 1, 2025, about six months after the low. Anyone forced to cash out near the low would have locked in losses.
Income is modest: the yield was 1.11% as of October 27, 2026, paid once a year. Costs run high: 0.85% a year, about $87 in the first year and $1,049 over 10 years on $10,000 in the SEC's standard example. Past results don't predict future ones, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors who want a manager, not an index, choosing drug and biotech stocks, with an emphasis on companies spending heavily on cancer research.
- Those comfortable with concentration: 32 holdings, with Eli Lilly at about 18% and the top 10 at 67% of assets as of June 30, 2026.
- Long-term holders who can keep it as a small side position and wait out drops like its 23.1% fall from August 2024 to April 2025.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-conscious investors: its 0.85% fee tops all eight similar funds compared, and its three-year return ranked 7th of 8 as of October 27, 2026.
- Retirees seeking regular income: the yield was 1.11% as of October 27, 2026, and distributions arrive only once a year.
- Those wary of small funds: net assets were about $19.1 million as of June 30, 2026, and shares could trade below their underlying value.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDX this fund | — | 0.85% | $19.1M | +19.1% | +13.9% |
| PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 53% | 0.36% | $879.5M | +26.4% | +17.9% |
| XLV Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund | 44% | 0.08% | $40.60B | +30.2% | +16.2% |
| IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 43% | 0.39% | $3.56B | +23.8% | +15.0% |
| FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 43% | 0.6% | $36.2M | +46.9% | +23.4% |
| FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 39% | 0.084% | $3.29B | +23.8% | +16.0% |
| VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 39% | 0.09% | $22.04B | +28.9% | +16.9% |
| IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF | 37% | 0.41% | $3.84B | +19.5% | +13.4% |
Questions investors ask
What are MEDX's top holdings?
As of June 30, 2026, MEDX's largest holding was Eli Lilly at about 18.5% of assets, followed by AbbVie (8.9%), Novartis (6.9%), Johnson & Johnson (5.6%) and Alkermes (5.5%). AstraZeneca, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck and Amgen made up the rest of the top 10, which together held 67% of the fund. It had 32 holdings in all. About 68% of assets were in US companies, with other stakes in Switzerland, the UK and Ireland.
What is the MEDX expense ratio?
MEDX's expense ratio is 0.85% a year, according to its prospectus filed April 27, 2026. That is higher than all eight similar funds compared here, which average 0.33%. Much larger health care funds such as the Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV), at 0.08%, and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT), at 0.09%, cost far less. The SEC's standard example assumes $10,000 invested and a 5% annual return. On that basis, costs would total about $87 after one year and $1,049 after 10 years.
Does MEDX pay a dividend?
Yes, but the payout is small and arrives once a year. MEDX's trailing 12-month yield, meaning the past year's distributions divided by the share price, was 1.11% as of October 27, 2026, based on about $0.41 per share. The fund's stated objective is long-term growth of capital, not income, and the amount can change from year to year. Anyone drawing regular income would have to rely on other holdings or on cashing out shares.
What's the difference between MEDX and PPH?
MEDX costs more, is far smaller and has trailed over one and three years. The VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) is the closest match by holdings, with about 53% overlap. PPH charges 0.36% a year versus 0.85% for MEDX. It held about $879 million versus about $19.1 million for MEDX as of June 30, 2026. As of October 27, 2026, PPH returned 26.4% over one year and 17.9% a year over three years, against 19.1% and 13.9% for MEDX. MEDX is actively managed, with an emphasis on cancer research.
How has MEDX performed over the long term?
MEDX returned an average of 5.67% a year over the 10 years to December 31, 2025, and 5.8% a year over five years, according to its prospectus. That record goes back before the ETF's January 30, 2023 launch. Results were uneven: losses of 6.03% in 2023 and 4.72% in 2024 were followed by a 28.45% gain in 2025. Its worst quarter, ending December 31, 2024, lost 12.89%. Past results don't predict future returns.