At a glance
IWP charges 0.23% a year, above the 0.13% average of the 8 funds most like it (the 8th cheapest of 9). It has $21.57B in assets, the 4th largest of that group; it paid 0.4% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned −8.0% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), the weakest of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +14.0% a year. At its worst it fell 35.9% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 33.7% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 4 months and 21 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 19.7% of the fund, out of 266 in all.
The short version
The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) is a BlackRock index fund that tracks the Russell Midcap Growth Index. It gives one-trade access to about 266 faster-growing US mid-sized companies, such as Datadog, Snowflake and Cloudflare (as of June 30, 2026). Its 0.23% yearly fee is well above the 0.13% average of similar funds, and its growth tilt has brought sharp swings, including a 57% fall in the 2008 financial crisis.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
IWP -8.0% over the year to Nov 2, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +8.46% | — | +6.44% | +12.26% | — |
| Russell 3000 Index index, same period | — | +17.15% | — | +13.15% | +14.29% | — |
| IWP price data to Nov 2, 2026 | -4.7% | -8.0% | +14.0% | +2.0% | +11.6% | +9.4% |
- Over the year to Nov 2, 2026, IWP returned -8.0%, 9th of 9 among similar funds.
- Its 5-year annualized return was +2.0% and its 10-year +11.6%.
- In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 35.9% and regained its old high 3.5 months after the low.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2008 (-44.6%); its best was 2009 (+46.5%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 57% (Oct 9, 2007 to Nov 20, 2008), recovered by Jan 14, 2011.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | -4.8% | — |
| 2025 | +8.4% | +8.46% |
| 2024 | +21.9% | +21.83% |
| 2023 | +25.7% | +25.63% |
| 2022 | -26.9% | -26.84% |
| 2021 | +12.6% | +12.50% |
| 2020 | +35.2% | +35.29% |
| 2019 | +35.0% | +35.14% |
| 2018 | -5.0% | -4.95% |
| 2017 | +24.9% | +24.98% |
| 2016 | +7.2% | +7.14% |
| 2015 | -0.5% | — |
| 2014 | +11.7% | — |
| 2013 | +35.5% | — |
| 2012 | +15.6% | — |
| 2011 | -1.9% | — |
| 2010 | +26.0% | — |
| 2009 | +46.5% | — |
| 2008 | -44.6% | — |
| 2007 | +10.6% | — |
| 2006 | +10.0% | — |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Lost 56.9% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 57%, back to its old high 25.8 months after the low |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Lost 35.9% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 35.9%, back to its old high 3.5 months after the low |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Lost 30.8% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 33.7%, back to its old high 20.7 months after the low |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.3600 | |
| 2025 | $0.5100 | -1.9% |
| 2024 | $0.5200 | -7.1% |
| 2023 | $0.5600 | -12.5% |
| 2022 | $0.6400 | +82.9% |
| 2021 | $0.3500 | -10.3% |
| 2020 | $0.3900 | -13.3% |
| 2019 | $0.4500 | -4.8% |
| 2018 | $0.4725 | +1.6% |
| 2017 | $0.4650 | -18.4% |
| 2016 | $0.5700 | +26.7% |
| 2015 | $0.4500 | -5.3% |
| 2014 | $0.4750 | +39.7% |
| 2013 | $0.3400 | -18.1% |
| 2012 | $0.4150 | +62.7% |
| 2011 | $0.2550 | +8.5% |
| 2010 | $0.2350 | +17.5% |
| 2009 | $0.2000 | +2.6% |
| 2008 | $0.1950 | +332.4% |
| 2007 | $0.0451 | +0.4% |
| 2006 | $0.0449 |
What's inside
As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 266 securities; the ten largest made up 19.71% of assets. It also reported 3.81% in a money-market fund, most likely cash collateral from lending out shares rather than uninvested money.
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Datadog, Inc. | 2.34% | |
| Snowflake, Inc. | 2.33% | |
| Cloudflare, Inc. | 2.12% | |
| Teradyne, Inc. | 2.07% | |
| Astera Labs, Inc. | 2.02% | |
| Simon Property Group, Inc. | 1.96% | |
| Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 1.89% | |
| Robinhood Markets, Inc. | 1.75% | |
| Lumentum Holdings, Inc. | 1.67% | |
| Targa Resources Corp. | 1.56% | |
| Rocket Lab Corp. | 1.49% | |
| Vistra Corp. | 1.46% | |
| Cencora, Inc. | 1.45% | |
| WW Grainger, Inc. | 1.39% | |
| Microchip Technology, Inc. | 1.33% |
By country
United States 92.66%Cayman Islands 2.61%United Kingdom 1.29%Liberia 1.24%Bermuda 0.51%By asset type
Stocks 99.87%By sector
Sectors of the companies held, for the 44% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jun 30, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors added a net $244.8M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +6.45%, +4.74%, +2.68%.
How it works
IWP tracks the Russell Midcap Growth Index from FTSE Russell. The index starts with the Russell Midcap Index of mid-sized US companies and picks those with growth traits: higher price-to-book ratios (share price relative to accounting net worth), faster past sales growth per share and higher forecast growth. As of March 31, 2026, the growth index covered about 41% of the Russell Midcap Index's market value, with a significant share in consumer goods and services, industrials and technology.
The index rebalances (resets its members and weights) quarterly, after the close on the third Friday of March, June, September and December. No company can exceed 22.5%, and companies above 4.5% each are capped at 45% combined. As of June 30, 2026, the fund held 266 stocks; the top 10, led by Datadog and Snowflake at about 2.3% each, made up about 20% of assets.
BlackRock uses representative sampling: instead of owning every index stock, the fund may hold a sample chosen to match the index's overall traits. It normally keeps at least 80% of net assets in index stocks and may use futures (contracts tied to an index), cash and money market funds to help track it. It may lend up to one-third of its assets. It does not try to beat the index or turn defensive when markets fall.
What it really costs
- IWP charges 0.23% a year, versus an average of 0.13% for the similar funds below (8th of 9, cheapest first).
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $24 in the first year and $293 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | $24 | $74 | $130 | $293 |
In a retirement portfolio
Its focus on mid-sized growth stocks, larger-than-market swings and a 57% drop in the 2008 crisis suit a smaller slice of a portfolio better than a foundation.
IWP could add faster-growing mid-sized companies to a portfolio built around large companies, but its falls have been steep. It dropped 57% from October 2007 to November 2008, then took about 26 months to recover. It lost 36% in the 2020 COVID crash and recovered in about 3.5 months. It fell 34% in the 2022 bear market and took about 21 months to recover. Its worst calendar year was 2008, at -44.6%. Anyone drawing money in a year like that would be cashing in shares at depressed prices.
Income is minimal: a 0.38% trailing 12-month yield as of October 29, 2026, paid quarterly. It costs 0.23% a year, above the 0.13% average for similar funds; the SEC's standard example puts that at $293 over 10 years on $10,000. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors wanting a smaller add-on holding of about 266 US mid-sized growth companies, led by Datadog, Snowflake and Cloudflare as of June 30, 2026.
- Long-horizon savers who can hold through drops like the 34% slide in 2022, which took about 21 months to recover from the low.
- Investors who want the Russell Midcap Growth Index specifically, in a large, long-running fund launched in 2001 with $21.6 billion as of June 30, 2026.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-focused investors: the 0.23% fee was the second-highest of nine similar funds, versus 0.07% for Vanguard's VOT and 0.06% for iShares' own IMCG.
- Retirees seeking income: the trailing yield was 0.38% as of October 29, 2026, paid quarterly, so it contributes little cash flow.
- Anyone who may need the money within a few years: IWP fell 57% from 2007 to 2008 and lost 26.84% in 2022.
Close alternatives
Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.
| Fund | Overlap | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP this fund | — | 0.23% | $21.57B | -8.0% | +14.0% |
| JMID Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 40% | 0.3% | $23.6M | +2.9% | — |
| VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 38% | 0.07% | $34.82B | -0.4% | +17.4% |
| IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 37% | 0.06% | $3.92B | +14.6% | +22.3% |
| IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 33% | 0.19% | $56.98B | +16.6% | +19.3% |
| CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index E… | 26% | 0.15% | $102.8M | +18.6% | +21.1% |
| IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 24% | 0.04% | $1.66B | +18.7% | +22.2% |
| AVMC Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 24% | 0.18% | $495.9M | +13.5% | — |
Questions investors ask
What are IWP's top 10 holdings?
As of June 30, 2026, IWP's five largest holdings were Datadog (2.3%), Snowflake (2.3%), Cloudflare (2.1%), Teradyne (2.1%) and Astera Labs (2.0%). The rest of the top 10 were Simon Property Group, Comfort Systems USA, Robinhood Markets, Lumentum Holdings and Targa Resources. Together they made up about 20% of a fund with 266 holdings, so no single company dominated. As of March 31, 2026, the index leaned toward consumer goods and services, industrials and technology.
Does IWP pay dividends?
Yes, but very little. IWP pays dividends quarterly, and its payouts over the 12 months to October 29, 2026, totaled about $0.52 per share, a yield of 0.38%. The yield is low largely because growth companies, which make up the index, tend to reinvest earnings rather than pay them out. Investors who rely on portfolio income would get little cash flow from this fund on its own.
What's the difference between IWP and VOT?
The biggest differences are cost and holdings. IWP, from BlackRock's iShares, tracks the Russell Midcap Growth Index and charges 0.23% a year. Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) charges 0.07%. Both hold mid-sized growth stocks, but their holdings overlapped by only about 38%. As of October 29, 2026, VOT returned 1.3% over one year versus -4.1% for IWP, and 18.5% a year over three years versus 17.2%. VOT was also larger, with $34.8 billion in net assets against $21.6 billion as of June 30, 2026.
How has IWP performed compared with the stock market?
It has trailed the broad US market over the periods shown in its prospectus. As of December 31, 2025, IWP returned 8.46% over one year, 6.44% a year over five years and 12.26% a year over 10 years. Over the same periods the Russell 3000 Index, a broad measure of US stocks, returned 17.15%, 13.15% and 14.29%. Over the year to October 29, 2026, IWP's price-based return was -4.1%, behind all eight similar funds compared.
What is IWP's expense ratio?
IWP's expense ratio, the yearly fee taken from fund assets, is 0.23%, according to its prospectus filed July 27, 2026. In the SEC's standard example of $10,000 invested with a 5% yearly return, that comes to about $24 in costs over one year and $293 over 10 years. Similar funds averaged 0.13%, and IWP had the second-highest cost of nine. Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) charges 0.07% and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) charges 0.06%.