iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF

IWPiSharesEquity
Expense ratio0.23%
Net assets$21.57B
Holdings266
Yield (TTM)0.4%
1 week-3.2%
1 month-7.9%
3 months-5.0%
6 months-4.2%
YTD-4.7%
1 year-8.0%
3 years*+14.0%
5 years*+2.0%
10 years*+11.6%

Total returns with distributions reinvested; * a year. Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 · filings through Jun 30, 2026 · page updated Nov 3, 2026

At a glance

IWP charges 0.23% a year, above the 0.13% average of the 8 funds most like it (the 8th cheapest of 9). It has $21.57B in assets, the 4th largest of that group; it paid 0.4% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, quarterly. Over the past year it returned −8.0% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), the weakest of those 9 funds; over three years it returned +14.0% a year. At its worst it fell 35.9% in the 2020 crash (S&P 500: 33.7%) and 33.7% in the 2022 bear market (S&P 500: 24.5%), and was back at its earlier high 4 months and 21 months after the lows. Its ten largest positions make up 19.7% of the fund, out of 266 in all.

The short version

The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) is a BlackRock index fund that tracks the Russell Midcap Growth Index. It gives one-trade access to about 266 faster-growing US mid-sized companies, such as Datadog, Snowflake and Cloudflare (as of June 30, 2026). Its 0.23% yearly fee is well above the 0.13% average of similar funds, and its growth tilt has brought sharp swings, including a 57% fall in the 2008 financial crisis.

Price history

The interactive chart needs JavaScript.

IWP -8.0% over the year to Nov 2, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.

Prices through Nov 2, 2026. Total return: the price with distributions reinvested.

How it has behaved

Volatility (1 year)18.3%annualized; the S&P 500 is usually 15–20%
Worst drop (1 year)-14.8%3 years: -25.2% · all history: -57.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.20moves about with the market
Sharpe ratio (1 year)-0.66return above cash per unit of risk
Since price data starts+9.4%a year over 21.3 years
Total over 5 years+10%10 years: +200%
52-week range$123.62 – $147.70
Last price $130.10 on Nov 2, 2026, 11.9% below the 52-week high · below its 200-day average ($137.81).
YTD1 yr3 yr5 yr10 yrSince start
IWP official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025—+8.46%—+6.44%+12.26%—
Russell 3000 Index index, same period—+17.15%—+13.15%+14.29%—
IWP price data to Nov 2, 2026-4.7%-8.0%+14.0%+2.0%+11.6%+9.4%
Multi-year figures are annualized total returns with distributions reinvested. "Official" figures are the SEC-standard returns from the fund's prospectus; the price-data row is computed from daily prices. Price data starts 2005-07-18, after the fund's launch on 2001-07-17; figures "since start" cover the available history only.
  • Over the year to Nov 2, 2026, IWP returned -8.0%, 9th of 9 among similar funds.
  • Its 5-year annualized return was +2.0% and its 10-year +11.6%.
  • In the 2020 COVID crash it fell 35.9% and regained its old high 3.5 months after the low.
  • Its worst full calendar year was 2008 (-44.6%); its best was 2009 (+46.5%).
  • The deepest fall in its price history was 57% (Oct 9, 2007 to Nov 20, 2008), recovered by Jan 14, 2011.
11%2007-45%200846%200926%2010-2%201116%201236%201312%2014-0.5%20157%201625%2017-5%201835%201935%202013%2021-27%202226%202322%20248%2025-5%2026*
25%2017-5%201835%201935%202013%2021-27%202226%202322%20248%2025-5%2026*
Calendar-year total returns from price data, distributions reinvested (last 20 years; all in the table). * 2026 is year to date. From the prospectus: best quarter +30.20% (Jun 30, 2020), worst -21.10% (Jun 30, 2022).
Show as a table
YearPrice dataProspectus (official)
2026 (to date)-4.8%—
2025+8.4%+8.46%
2024+21.9%+21.83%
2023+25.7%+25.63%
2022-26.9%-26.84%
2021+12.6%+12.50%
2020+35.2%+35.29%
2019+35.0%+35.14%
2018-5.0%-4.95%
2017+24.9%+24.98%
2016+7.2%+7.14%
2015-0.5%—
2014+11.7%—
2013+35.5%—
2012+15.6%—
2011-1.9%—
2010+26.0%—
2009+46.5%—
2008-44.6%—
2007+10.6%—
2006+10.0%—
2008 financial crisis
stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009
Lost 56.9% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 57%, back to its old high 25.8 months after the low
2020 COVID crash
stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020
Lost 35.9% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 35.9%, back to its old high 3.5 months after the low
2022 bear market
stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022
Lost 30.8% over that stretch · deepest drop along the way 33.7%, back to its old high 20.7 months after the low

Dividends and income

Yield (last 12 months)0.4%distributions ÷ price
Paid in the last 12 months$0.52per share, split-adjusted
How oftenquarterly 
Latest payment$0.1500Sep 15, 2026
$0.0520072008$0.2020092010$0.2620112012$0.3420132014$0.4520152016$0.4720172018$0.4520192020$0.3520212022$0.5620232024$0.5120252026*
$0.472017$0.472018$0.452019$0.392020$0.352021$0.642022$0.562023$0.522024$0.512025$0.362026*
Distributions per share by calendar year, adjusted for a share split. * 2026 to Nov 2, 2026.
Show as a table
YearPer shareChange
2026 (to date)$0.3600
2025$0.5100-1.9%
2024$0.5200-7.1%
2023$0.5600-12.5%
2022$0.6400+82.9%
2021$0.3500-10.3%
2020$0.3900-13.3%
2019$0.4500-4.8%
2018$0.4725+1.6%
2017$0.4650-18.4%
2016$0.5700+26.7%
2015$0.4500-5.3%
2014$0.4750+39.7%
2013$0.3400-18.1%
2012$0.4150+62.7%
2011$0.2550+8.5%
2010$0.2350+17.5%
2009$0.2000+2.6%
2008$0.1950+332.4%
2007$0.0451+0.4%
2006$0.0449
Distributions through Nov 2, 2026.

What's inside

As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 266 securities; the ten largest made up 19.71% of assets. It also reported 3.81% in a money-market fund, most likely cash collateral from lending out shares rather than uninvested money.

HoldingWeight
Datadog, Inc.2.34%
Snowflake, Inc.2.33%
Cloudflare, Inc.2.12%
Teradyne, Inc.2.07%
Astera Labs, Inc.2.02%
Simon Property Group, Inc.1.96%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.1.89%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.1.75%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.1.67%
Targa Resources Corp.1.56%
Rocket Lab Corp.1.49%
Vistra Corp.1.46%
Cencora, Inc.1.45%
WW Grainger, Inc.1.39%
Microchip Technology, Inc.1.33%

By country

United States 92.66%Cayman Islands 2.61%United Kingdom 1.29%Liberia 1.24%Bermuda 0.51%

By asset type

Stocks 99.87%

By sector

Technology12.8%
Industrials6.0%
Consumer discretionary4.3%
Financials4.0%
Health care4.0%
Communication services3.8%
Energy2.8%
Utilities2.3%
Real estate2.1%
Other companies1.0%
Consumer staples0.6%
Materials0.3%
Not classified56.0%
Sectors of the companies held, for the 44% of the fund in companies that have a stock page here; other holdings and cash aren't classified. Source: N-PORT holdings report as of Jun 30, 2026. Cash, money-market funds and derivatives are shown separately from the securities list.

What changed recently

  • Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors added a net $244.8M (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
  • Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +6.45%, +4.74%, +2.68%.

How it works

IWP tracks the Russell Midcap Growth Index from FTSE Russell. The index starts with the Russell Midcap Index of mid-sized US companies and picks those with growth traits: higher price-to-book ratios (share price relative to accounting net worth), faster past sales growth per share and higher forecast growth. As of March 31, 2026, the growth index covered about 41% of the Russell Midcap Index's market value, with a significant share in consumer goods and services, industrials and technology.

The index rebalances (resets its members and weights) quarterly, after the close on the third Friday of March, June, September and December. No company can exceed 22.5%, and companies above 4.5% each are capped at 45% combined. As of June 30, 2026, the fund held 266 stocks; the top 10, led by Datadog and Snowflake at about 2.3% each, made up about 20% of assets.

BlackRock uses representative sampling: instead of owning every index stock, the fund may hold a sample chosen to match the index's overall traits. It normally keeps at least 80% of net assets in index stocks and may use futures (contracts tied to an index), cash and money market funds to help track it. It may lend up to one-third of its assets. It does not try to beat the index or turn defensive when markets fall.

What it really costs

  • IWP charges 0.23% a year, versus an average of 0.13% for the similar funds below (8th of 9, cheapest first).
  • Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $24 in the first year and $293 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
Cost of $10,000 (SEC example)1 yr3 yrs5 yrs10 yrs
IWP$24$74$130$293
SEC standard example: $10,000 invested, 5% annual return, shares sold at the end of each period.

In a retirement portfolio

RoleSatellite (higher risk)

Its focus on mid-sized growth stocks, larger-than-market swings and a 57% drop in the 2008 crisis suit a smaller slice of a portfolio better than a foundation.

IWP could add faster-growing mid-sized companies to a portfolio built around large companies, but its falls have been steep. It dropped 57% from October 2007 to November 2008, then took about 26 months to recover. It lost 36% in the 2020 COVID crash and recovered in about 3.5 months. It fell 34% in the 2022 bear market and took about 21 months to recover. Its worst calendar year was 2008, at -44.6%. Anyone drawing money in a year like that would be cashing in shares at depressed prices.

Income is minimal: a 0.38% trailing 12-month yield as of October 29, 2026, paid quarterly. It costs 0.23% a year, above the 0.13% average for similar funds; the SEC's standard example puts that at $293 over 10 years on $10,000. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.

Planning to live on your savings? See whether your whole plan holds up, with your real accounts, taxes and Social Security, in ReadyAimRetire.
Run my plan →

Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere

May suit

  • Investors wanting a smaller add-on holding of about 266 US mid-sized growth companies, led by Datadog, Snowflake and Cloudflare as of June 30, 2026.
  • Long-horizon savers who can hold through drops like the 34% slide in 2022, which took about 21 months to recover from the low.
  • Investors who want the Russell Midcap Growth Index specifically, in a large, long-running fund launched in 2001 with $21.6 billion as of June 30, 2026.

Look elsewhere if

  • Cost-focused investors: the 0.23% fee was the second-highest of nine similar funds, versus 0.07% for Vanguard's VOT and 0.06% for iShares' own IMCG.
  • Retirees seeking income: the trailing yield was 0.38% as of October 29, 2026, paid quarterly, so it contributes little cash flow.
  • Anyone who may need the money within a few years: IWP fell 57% from 2007 to 2008 and lost 26.84% in 2022.

Close alternatives

Matched by holdings overlap from the latest N-PORT reports.

FundOverlapCostNet assets1 yr3 yr
IWP this fund—0.23%$21.57B-8.0%+14.0%
JMID Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF40%0.3%$23.6M+2.9%—
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF38%0.07%$34.82B-0.4%+17.4%
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF37%0.06%$3.92B+14.6%+22.3%
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF33%0.19%$56.98B+16.6%+19.3%
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index E…26%0.15%$102.8M+18.6%+21.1%
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF24%0.04%$1.66B+18.7%+22.2%
AVMC Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF24%0.18%$495.9M+13.5%—
Net assets from each fund's latest N-PORT or annual report where available. Returns through Nov 2, 2026.

Questions investors ask

What are IWP's top 10 holdings?

As of June 30, 2026, IWP's five largest holdings were Datadog (2.3%), Snowflake (2.3%), Cloudflare (2.1%), Teradyne (2.1%) and Astera Labs (2.0%). The rest of the top 10 were Simon Property Group, Comfort Systems USA, Robinhood Markets, Lumentum Holdings and Targa Resources. Together they made up about 20% of a fund with 266 holdings, so no single company dominated. As of March 31, 2026, the index leaned toward consumer goods and services, industrials and technology.

Does IWP pay dividends?

Yes, but very little. IWP pays dividends quarterly, and its payouts over the 12 months to October 29, 2026, totaled about $0.52 per share, a yield of 0.38%. The yield is low largely because growth companies, which make up the index, tend to reinvest earnings rather than pay them out. Investors who rely on portfolio income would get little cash flow from this fund on its own.

What's the difference between IWP and VOT?

The biggest differences are cost and holdings. IWP, from BlackRock's iShares, tracks the Russell Midcap Growth Index and charges 0.23% a year. Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) charges 0.07%. Both hold mid-sized growth stocks, but their holdings overlapped by only about 38%. As of October 29, 2026, VOT returned 1.3% over one year versus -4.1% for IWP, and 18.5% a year over three years versus 17.2%. VOT was also larger, with $34.8 billion in net assets against $21.6 billion as of June 30, 2026.

How has IWP performed compared with the stock market?

It has trailed the broad US market over the periods shown in its prospectus. As of December 31, 2025, IWP returned 8.46% over one year, 6.44% a year over five years and 12.26% a year over 10 years. Over the same periods the Russell 3000 Index, a broad measure of US stocks, returned 17.15%, 13.15% and 14.29%. Over the year to October 29, 2026, IWP's price-based return was -4.1%, behind all eight similar funds compared.

What is IWP's expense ratio?

IWP's expense ratio, the yearly fee taken from fund assets, is 0.23%, according to its prospectus filed July 27, 2026. In the SEC's standard example of $10,000 invested with a 5% yearly return, that comes to about $24 in costs over one year and $293 over 10 years. Similar funds averaged 0.13%, and IWP had the second-highest cost of nine. Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) charges 0.07% and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) charges 0.06%.

Sources

  • 485BPOS prospectus (risk/return XBRL), filed Jul 27, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • N-PORT holdings report, filed Aug 25, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • Prices: daily prices and distributions through Nov 2, 2026

For education only, not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.