At a glance
DUKQ charges 0.99% a year, above the 0.86% average of the 7 funds most like it (the most expensive of 8). It has $13.7M in assets, the 8th largest of that group; it paid 0.29% of its price in distributions over the past 12 months, semiannual. Over the past year it returned +12.5% with distributions reinvested (S&P 500: +11.5%), 3rd of those 8 funds. Its ten largest positions make up 94.5% of the fund, out of 12 in all.
The short version
Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) is an actively managed fund of funds: it holds other US stock ETFs and aims for total return while limiting losses. Unlike buffer funds, which use options to cushion losses, it follows price trends, dropping ETFs as they turn down and at times moving into cash equivalents such as Treasury bills. It is small ($13.7 million as of June 30, 2026) and charges a relatively high 0.99% a year.
Price history
The interactive chart needs JavaScript.
DUKQ +12.5% over the year to Oct 27, 2026, total return with distributions reinvested.
How it has behaved
| YTD | 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 10 yr | Since start | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUKQ official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2025 | — | +5.56% | — | — | — | +7.61% |
| Morningstar US Market TR USD (reflects no deduction for fees, expense or taxes) index, same period | — | +17.35% | — | — | — | +15.71% |
| DUKQ price data to Oct 27, 2026 | +13.3% | +12.5% | — | — | — | +10.6% |
- Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, DUKQ returned +12.5%, 3rd of 8 among similar funds.
- Its worst full calendar year was 2025 (+5.7%); its best was 2025 (+5.7%).
- The deepest fall in its price history was 18.4% (Dec 4, 2024 to Apr 7, 2025), recovered by Oct 24, 2025.
Show as a table
| Year | Price data | Prospectus (official) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | +13.3% | — |
| 2025 | +5.7% | +5.56% |
| 2008 financial crisis stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009 | Before this security existed |
|---|---|
| 2020 COVID crash stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020 | Before this security existed |
| 2022 bear market stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022 | Before this security existed |
Dividends and income
Show as a table
| Year | Per share | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to date) | $0.0300 | |
| 2025 | $0.1900 |
What's inside
As of Jun 30, 2026, the fund held 12 securities; the ten largest made up 94.5% of assets.
| Fund held | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| SCHWAB US LARGE | 24.03% | |
| INVES NASDAQ 100 | 19.66% | |
| SCHWAB US MID CAP ETF | 10.27% | |
| INVESCO S&P 500 | 9.93% | |
| INVESCO S&P 500 | 5.36% | |
| SCHWAB US SMALL | 5.25% | |
| VANGUARD M/C GRW | 5.09% | |
| VICTORYSHARES CF | 5.06% | |
| ISHARES RUSSELL MID-CAP V | 5.01% | |
| ISHARES SELECT D | 4.85% | |
| ISHARES RUSSELL | 2.58% | |
| ISHARES RUSSELL | 2.52% |
By country
United States 99.61%By asset type
Stocks 99.61%What changed recently
- Over the three months to Jun 30, 2026, investors withdrew a net $66K (creations minus redemptions, per the N-PORT report).
- Monthly total returns reported for that quarter: +9.24%, +5.53%, +1.53%.
How it works
DUKQ does not track an index. Its adviser, Ocean Park Asset Management, chooses among US stock ETFs from other fund companies, with no limit on their number or type. They can be passive or active and focus on any company size, style, sector or industry. As of June 30, 2026, it held 12 funds, led by a Schwab US large-cap ETF (24.0%), an Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (19.7%), the Schwab US Mid Cap ETF (10.3%) and two Invesco S&P 500 funds (9.9% and 5.4%).
Trades follow trend signals meant to limit losses. For each ETF, the adviser sets an upper and a lower band around a short-term exponential moving average, a recent-price average weighted toward the latest days. An entry signal comes when the price rises above both the recent low of the upper band and a second moving average. An exit signal comes when it falls below the recent high of the lower band. Proceeds may go into another ETF or, for a time, into cash equivalents such as Treasury bills, and the fund can sit partly or fully in them.
Trading is frequent. Turnover was 129%, roughly like replacing the whole portfolio more than once a year, which can add costs. Because the rules react after prices move, the fund can fall before an exit signal arrives.
What it really costs
- DUKQ charges 0.99% a year, versus an average of 0.86% for the similar funds below (8th of 8, cheapest first).
- Of that, 0.75% is the management fee; the rest covers other fund expenses.
- The fee includes a 1.07% waiver from the adviser, which may end.
- Using the prospectus's standard example, $10,000 invested would cost about $101 in the first year and $2,304 over 10 years (assuming a 5% annual return).
| Cost of $10,000 (SEC example) | 1 yr | 3 yrs | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUKQ | $101 | $542 | $1,010 | $2,304 |
Structure and tax notes
- Invests in other funds rather than directly in stocks or bonds, so its holdings are those funds.
In a retirement portfolio
It's a small, high-cost tactical stock fund whose loss-limiting system has a record dating only to July 2024, so it may fit better as a smaller position than as a core holding.
DUKQ could add a rules-based attempt to sidestep part of a stock-market decline. Its record is short: it launched in July 2024, so it has no history through the 2008 crisis, the 2020 COVID crash or the 2022 bear market. Its only full calendar year, 2025, returned 5.56%, versus 17.35% for the Morningstar US Market index. Its deepest drop was 18.4%, from December 4, 2024 to April 7, 2025, and it took about 6.6 months to recover. Someone who had to cash out near that low would have locked in a loss despite the fund's loss-limiting goal.
Income is minimal: the yield was 0.29% as of October 27, 2026, paid twice a year. Its 0.99% expense ratio is above the 0.86% average of seven buffer funds it was compared with. Past results don't predict the future, and a plan should look at the whole portfolio, not one fund.
Who it may suit — and who should look elsewhere
May suit
- Investors wanting US stock exposure managed by trend signals that can shift part or all of the fund into Treasury bills and similar cash equivalents.
- Those wanting an adviser to rotate among large-, mid- and small-cap US stock ETFs, led by Schwab large-cap and Invesco Nasdaq 100 funds.
- Investors who want a downside-limiting aim without the capped upside of options-based buffer funds, and accept a track record starting in July 2024.
Look elsewhere if
- Cost-conscious investors: its 0.99% expense ratio reflects a fee waiver and still tops the 0.86% average of seven buffer funds it's compared with.
- Anyone needing income: the yield was 0.29% as of October 27, 2026, paid twice a year.
- Those wanting proven downside protection: it fell 18.4% from December 2024 to April 2025 and trailed its benchmark index in 2025, 5.56% versus 17.35%.
Close alternatives
Matched by other buffer (defined-outcome) funds, largest first.
| Fund | Cost | Net assets | 1 yr | 3 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUKQ this fund | 0.99% | $13.7M | +12.5% | — |
| BUFR FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF | 0.95% | $10.49B | +11.6% | +16.8% |
| BUFD FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF | 0.95% | $2.04B | +9.5% | +13.9% |
| PJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - Ja… | 0.79% | $1.44B | +10.5% | +14.8% |
| PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - De… | 0.79% | $984.1M | +11.6% | +14.9% |
| FDEC FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - December | 0.85% | $1.31B | +12.9% | +18.5% |
| FJAN FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - January | 0.85% | $1.47B | +12.3% | +17.4% |
| FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer Fund - February | 0.85% | $1.42B | +12.9% | +18.6% |
Questions investors ask
What does DUKQ invest in?
DUKQ invests in other US stock ETFs, and at times in cash equivalents such as Treasury bills. As of June 30, 2026, it held 12 funds, led by a Schwab US large-cap ETF (24.0%), an Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (19.7%) and the Schwab US Mid Cap ETF (10.3%). Its 10 largest holdings made up 94.5% of assets, and cash was 0.5%. The mix can change often: the fund's turnover was 129%.
What is DUKQ's expense ratio?
DUKQ's expense ratio is 0.99% a year, per its prospectus filed October 27, 2026, which reflects a fee waiver of 1.07%. The SEC's standard example, $10,000 earning 5% a year, puts total costs at $101 after one year, $542 after three, $1,010 after five and $2,304 after ten. Those later figures rise faster than 0.99% a year would, a sign the example assumes the waiver doesn't continue. The seven buffer funds it's compared with average 0.86%.
Does DUKQ pay dividends?
Yes, but very little. DUKQ's yield was 0.29% as of October 27, 2026, based on $0.09 per share paid over the prior year. It pays semiannually, meaning twice a year. The fund's stated goals are total return and limiting downside risk, not income, so its payout does little for retirees who want steady cash from their investments.
Does DUKQ protect against stock market losses?
Its short record shows no clear protection so far. DUKQ fell 18.4% from December 4, 2024 to April 7, 2025, then took about 6.6 months to recover. Its beta, a measure of how closely it moves with the market, was 1.01 for the year to October 27, 2026, meaning it moved roughly in step with stocks. It launched in July 2024, so it has no record in the 2008, 2020 or 2022 downturns. Trend rules react only after prices move.
DUKQ vs BUFR: what's the difference?
They share a goal, softening losses, but use different tools, so BUFR isn't a close substitute. BUFR, the FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF, is a buffer fund: it relies on options to cushion part of a loss in exchange for capped gains. DUKQ holds no options; it shifts among US stock ETFs and cash equivalents on trend signals. BUFR is cheaper at 0.95% and far larger, with $10.5 billion in assets as of August 31, 2026. In the year to October 27, 2026, DUKQ returned 12.5% and BUFR 11.6%.