QQQ vs QQQM

QQQInvesco QQQ Trust Series IvsQQQMInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Expense ratioNet assetsYield (TTM)Overlap1 yr5 yr*
QQQ0.18%$490.10B0.45%91%+8.8%+12.5%
QQQM0.15%$104.38B0.47%+8.8%+12.6%

Total returns with distributions reinvested; * a year. Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 · holdings and costs from SEC filings · page updated Nov 3, 2026

At a glance

QQQ and QQQM hold almost the same stocks in almost the same amounts: 91% of their holdings overlap by weight. QQQM costs less: 0.15% a year against 0.18% for QQQ, or $150 against $180 on every $100,000. QQQ has $490.10B in assets and QQQM $104.38B; over the past 12 months QQQ paid out 0.45% of its price and QQQM 0.47%, both quarterly. Over the past year QQQ returned +8.8% and QQQM +8.8% with distributions reinvested; over five years, +12.5% and +12.6% a year. In the 2022 bear market QQQ fell 34.3% at its worst and QQQM 34.2%; both were back at their earlier highs 14 months after the low.

Key differences

QQQQQQM
FundInvesco QQQ Trust Series IInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
IssuerInvescoInvesco
StructureOpen-end ETFOpen-end ETF
TypeNasdaq-100Nasdaq-100
LaunchedMar 10, 1999Oct 13, 2020
Expense ratio0.18%0.15%
Cost a year on $100,000$180$150
Net assets$490.10B$104.38B
Holdings102102
Ten largest positions45.0%46.3%
Yield (12 months)0.45%0.47%
Paysquarterlyquarterly
Portfolio turnover7.98% a year6% a year
Price data fromJun 6, 2005Feb 22, 2021

Holdings and overlap

Overlap by weight91%the share of each fund in holdings both own
Securities in common101QQQ 102 · QQQM 102 in all
Ten largest positions45.0% / 46.3%of assets, QQQ / QQQM

Overlap adds up, for every security both funds own, the smaller of its two weights: 100% would mean identical portfolios.

Largest holdings

HoldingQQQQQQM
NVIDIA Corp.7.60%8.51%
Apple Inc.6.67%7.41%
Microsoft Corp.4.35%6.00%
Micron Technology, Inc.5.64%4.76%
Amazon.com, Inc.4.02%4.45%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.4.10%3.38%
Tesla, Inc.3.30%2.93%
Alphabet Inc. Class A3.27%3.15%
Intel Corp.3.04%1.98%
Alphabet Inc. Class C3.02%2.92%
Broadcom Inc.2.81%2.80%

The biggest differences in weight: Microsoft Corp. (4.3% in QQQ, 6.0% in QQQM); Intel Corp. (3.0% in QQQ, 2.0% in QQQM); NVIDIA Corp. (7.6% in QQQ, 8.5% in QQQM).

By sector

SectorQQQQQQMDifference
Technology53.9%52.8%QQQ +1.1
Communication services12.1%12.0%QQQ +0.1
Consumer discretionary11.0%11.4%QQQM +0.4
Consumer staples6.0%6.0%—
Health care2.0%2.3%QQQM +0.3
Industrials1.9%2.1%QQQM +0.2
Utilities1.1%1.1%—
Financials0.3%0.4%QQQM +0.1
Energy0.2%0.2%—
Sectors of the companies each fund holds that have a stock page here (89.3% of QQQ, 89.3% of QQQM). Source: N-PORT holdings reports as of Jun 30, 2026 (QQQ) and Aug 31, 2026 (QQQM).

Returns

$0$13K$25K20222023202420252026
QQQ QQQM · $10,000 in each on Feb 26, 2021, distributions reinvested.

$10,000 put into QQQ on Feb 26, 2021 was worth $22,414 on Nov 2, 2026, and in QQQM $22,395 (+15.3% and +15.2% a year). That is as far back as the price data for both goes.

1 yr3 yr5 yr10 yr
QQQ price data to Nov 2, 2026+8.8%+24.0%+12.5%+20.3%
QQQ official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2024+25.58%—+19.94%+18.28%
QQQM price data to Nov 2, 2026+8.8%+24.1%+12.6%—
QQQM official prospectus, to Dec 31, 2024+25.70%———
Multi-year figures are annualized total returns with distributions reinvested. "Official" rows are the SEC-standard returns from each fund's prospectus, to the end of the last calendar year; they reach back further where the price data starts late. QQQ: Price data starts 2005-06-06, after the fund's launch on 1999-03-10; figures "since start" cover the available history only. QQQM: Price data starts 2021-02-22, after the fund's launch on 2020-10-13; figures "since start" cover the available history only.

Calendar years

YearQQQQQQMDifference
2026+11.2% *+11.3% *—
2025+20.8%+20.8%QQQM +0.1
2024+25.6%+25.7%QQQM +0.1
2023+54.9%+55.0%QQQM +0.1
2022-32.6%-32.5%QQQM +0.1
2021+27.4%+27.33% †
2020+48.6%—
2019+39.0%—
2018-0.1%—
2017+32.7%—
Total returns from price data; † from the fund’s prospectus where the price data starts later; * year to Nov 2, 2026.

Downturns and recovery

QQQQQQM
2008 financial crisis
stocks fell Oct 9, 2007 – Mar 9, 2009
−53.4% at the worst; back at its high 25 months after the lowBefore it launched
2020 COVID crash
stocks fell Feb 19, 2020 – Mar 23, 2020
−28.6% at the worst; back at its high 3 months after the lowBefore it launched
2022 bear market
stocks fell Jan 3, 2022 – Oct 12, 2022
−34.3% at the worst; back at its high 14 months after the low−34.2% at the worst; back at its high 14 months after the low
Worst fall in the price data−53.4% (Oct 31, 2007 – Nov 20, 2008)−35% (Nov 19, 2021 – Nov 3, 2022)
The deepest drop from a high to a low during each stretch when stocks fell, and how long the fund took to get back to its earlier high, with distributions reinvested. The price data starts Jun 6, 2005 for QQQ and Feb 22, 2021 for QQQM.

Income

QQQ yield (12 months)0.45%paid quarterly
QQQM yield (12 months)0.47%paid quarterly
YearQQQQQQM
2025$55$60
2024$69$76
2023$95$100
2022$54$56
Distributions paid during each calendar year on $10,000 of shares bought at the previous year-end close, adjusted for share splits. Before taxes.

Costs

QQQM charges 0.15% a year and QQQ 0.18%: on $100,000 that is $30 a year less with QQQM ($150 on $500,000). The fee comes out of each fund's assets, so it is already in the returns above.

Cost of $10,000 (SEC example)1 yr3 yrs5 yrs10 yrs
QQQ$18$58$101$230
QQQM$15$48$85$192
From each fund's prospectus: the total costs on $10,000 invested, at a 5% yearly return, with the shares sold at the end of each period.
Picked a fund? Check the plan around it. ReadyAimRetire shows whether your savings, Social Security and spending hold up year by year, whichever funds you hold.
Test my plan →

Sources

  • QQQ: 485BPOS prospectus (risk/return XBRL), filed Dec 19, 2025 — SEC EDGAR
  • QQQ: N-PORT holdings report, filed Aug 28, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • QQQM: 485BPOS prospectus (risk/return XBRL), filed Dec 18, 2025 — SEC EDGAR
  • QQQM: N-PORT holdings report, filed Oct 30, 2026 — SEC EDGAR
  • Prices: daily prices and distributions through Nov 2, 2026

For education only, not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell either fund. Past performance does not predict future results.